Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Nov 26

SC EP:1010 The Giant Wars

Gary Wayne is a Christian contrarian who has maintained a lifelong love affair with biblical prophecy, history, and mythology. His extensive study has encompassed the Holy Bible and Gnostic scriptures, The Qur’an, the Bhagavad Gita, Gilgamesh and other ancient epics, language etymology, and secret society publications.

I had Gary on before and we discussed his research into the Nephilim. He will be returning for a part two. Check out excerpts from The Genesis 6 Conspiracy Part II Here.

If you have not read the first book I highly recommend it.

 

 


 

 

Stream Player

 

 

Open New Player Window

 

 

 

 

 

 

135 Responses to “SC EP:1010 The Giant Wars”

      • Jesse L

        A VERY good reason “MEGA FLORA AND FAUNA” are smaller is because GRAVITY is stroner now. Please look up Thunderbolts Project on Youtube. Chk playlist, go down to “Feature Length Documentary”. The celestial alignment our ancient ancestors describle ALL OVER THE EARTH would have had LESS gravitational conditions. The purple Dawn Theory suggests we have a hybrid solar system because our star, THE SUN, electrically captured Saturn and Her satellites. One of the being Earth. And during the time before this event Earth orbited Saturn and Gravity was much less and light had a different color spectrum as Saturn was a brown or red dwarf star. Please read up on this. It answers so many questions people have INCLUDING FOSSIL RECORDS BEING FAULSIFIED. THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO. I TO HAD AN EXPERIENCE. 2005 OR 2006. Sangamon River. North of Springfield Illinois. Theyre real.

    • Mary S

      Renewed this membership to ask this question: is it all about preserving the DNA? Has this been the plan all along? Children killed? Gary Wayne help me figure this out please

    • Biff S

      This was incredibly difficult to listen to.

      To my ears it quite literally sounded like this ,

      “This one Guy did this one thing and it was awesome, and then this other guy did this other thing and that was awesome. And Bill, the unknown character was related to this other guy. And that was something wasn’t it.”

      It was quite honestly unfollowable.

      • Julie W

        Hi, If you really want to dive into the biblical side of it all, go to Youtube and look up channels like SkywatchTV, LAMarzulli, Chris Putnam…these folks have been laying these things out step by step for decades. You will need to dedicate a few hours a week to catch up on thousands of years of factual history. Once you get a little bit of a grip on it, go look up the archaeology channels and see what they have dug up recently that was told of in the bible thousands of years ago. It will blow your mind, and in fact, it terrifies most of those that do not want to believe in the God of creation side of things because it means that hellfire is real and most are headed there, IF they do not chose to be ‘born again of the water and the spirit. It’s a rough education for sure.

  16. Nolebez

    I am in constant contact with God. Jesus died.Jesus defeated death. Jesus is the Lord, The Light & the Way. Just remember all of this changes none of that. If you don’t believe, it doesn’t matter much then does it. It’s better to know though. I would highly recommend that.

    • Jay V

      Spiritual warfare is a very powerful and present and ongoing practice. Do you think that Wes would just want to attach this type of material or information by this man if he didn’t think it played relevant to the overall theme of this podcast.? These beasts are indeed fallen angels and if you do see them, it’s not good. It happens to the lukewarm in spirit or the leodicea. If your spirit runs hot for the lord you know, if yours run cold at least you are still aware that you’re far off the path. If you’re lukewarm, you’re in a place of ignorance to the lord, you think you’re saved but you are not. The latter is most people. They may even go to church every Sunday but the primary purpose is chasing two things. Wealth and pleasure, wealth and pleasure, wealth and pleasure. Everything else comes after those two motivations, even Jesus. I personally will be terrified if I were to ever see some beast with glowing eyes because the implications of a beast like that not fleeing from me before I could even draw near means it has no fear of my spirit and therefore I must be lost and lukewarm myself

  23. Timothy D

    “Not everyone’s cup of tea”, as Wes says, but a cup of tea that will do us some good nonetheless. Why? Because this cup of tea is about knowledge and knowledge is a beautiful thing.
    And during these times in which we live, knowledge and facts are both under assault, and we would do well to gather as much as we can, while we can. Just a thought.

  24. Rob S

    Man, definitely not my cup of tea. Tried to keep an open mind but this episode is nothing but fan fiction… Where are the corroborating sources? Some evidence samples within history? Anything?

    • Timothy D

      Thoughtful comment, Rob, S. Both gary’s first book and upcoming second are very conscientious about sourcing, footnotes, and peer reviewed scholarship, which is the most important criteria in any work. Not much on the latter, but gary is breaking new ground, which makes him a bit of both a phenomena and pariah.
      Always like to keep an eye out for people on the edge, who are willing to put themselves out there with some level of informed opinion.
      Gary and Wes (I do not personally know either man), are helping to raise the intellectual content of an important conversation IMO. Eventually, we want to get into the crossover meaning of bloodlines, as it relates to Sasquatch/orbs and current UFO phenomena.
      Your skepticism is a gift to the greater community, in as much as Wes‘s courage is to publish/present gary and his message.
      (Neither here nor there, but I Hope to be contributing more to this existential question through my own work in the future.)
      Have a good week.

      • Rob S

        I agree Timothy that awareness is important. However, the entire premise is based on the belief, not fact, that the bible and other ancient writings are factual historical record. With out this premise – It’s just conjecture, not data. You might as well just fabricate it all. Archaeology and other research surrounding the topics within the text are always interesting when carried out objectively but one cannot just assume it to all be factual and extrapolate more, this is a narrative and people need to remember that.

        The minute you move from eyewitness accounts which can assessed and analysed with a set of consistent variables onto narratives based on translated texts from thousands of years ago the variables blow out to a point at which the material isn’t even relevant.

        In your reply you mentioned wanting to better understand the cross over of bigfoot/orbs/ufo etc. Is there one at all? None have yet to be proven, let alone related – except that they are all phenomena that are unproven, subjective and an ongoing trend in human psychology. This is what interests me personally the most. The existence or lack there of is a coincidental consequence. I’m more an observer than a sceptic because ultimately what I think doesn’t really matter.

  25. Nick H

    Thanks Wes, Thanks Gary, enjoyed reading The Genesis 6 Conspiracy, has lots of good stuff in there, I was hoping you would be back on SC, ep 112 and 143 were a long time ago.

  29. Michael H

    This is long but here’s proof that the Bible is of supernatural origin. No human, group of humans, nor any computer, could accomplish this:

    Excerpts from Dr. Ivan Panin’s 1899 Letter to the New York Sun

    The first 17 verses of the New Testament contain the genealogy of the Christ. It consists of two main parts: Verses 1-11 cover the period from Abraham, the father of the chosen people, to the Captivity, when they ceased as an independent people. Verses 12-17 cover the period from the Captivity to the promised Deliverer, the Christ.

    Let us examine the first part of this genealogy.

    Its vocabulary has 49 words, or 7 x 7. This number is itself seven (Feature 1) sevens (Feature 2), and the sum of its factors is 2 sevens (Feature 3). Of these 49 words 28, or 4 sevens, begin with a vowel; and 21, or 3 sevens, begin with a consonant (Feature 4).

    Again: these 49 words of the vocabulary have 266 letters, or 7 x 2 x 19; this number is itself 38 sevens (Feature 5), and the sum of its factors is 28, or 4 sevens (Feature 6, while the sum of its figures is 14, or 2 sevens (Feature 7). Of these 266 letters, moreover, 140, or 20 sevens, are vowels, and 126, or 18 sevens, are consonants (Feature 8).

    That is to say: Just as the number of words in the vocabulary is a multiple of seven, so is the number of its letters a multiple of seven; just as the sum of the factors of the number of the words is a multiple of seven, so is the sum of the factors of the number of their letters a multiple of seven. And just as the number of words is divided between vowel words and consonant words by sevens, so is their number of letters divided between vowels and consonants by sevens.

    Again: Of these 49 words 35, or 5 sevens, occur more than once in the passage; and 14, or 2 sevens, occur but once (Feature 9); seven occur in more than one form, and 42, or 6 sevens, occur in only one form (Feature 10). And among the parts of speech the 49 words are thus divided: 42, or 6 sevens, are nouns, seven are not nouns (Feature 12). Of the nouns 35 or 5 sevens, are Proper names, seven are common nouns (Feature 12). Of the Proper names 28 are male ancestors of the Christ, and seven are not (Feature 13).

    Moreover, these 49 words are distributed alphabetically thus: Words under A-E are 21 in number, or 3 sevens; Z-K 14, or 2 sevens; M-X also 14. No other groups of sevens stopping at the end of a letter are made by these 49 words, the groups of sevens stop with these letters and no others. But the letters A, E, Z, K, M, X, are letters 1, 5, 6, 10, 12, 22, of the Greek alphabet, and the sum of these numbers (called their Place Values) is 56, or 8 sevens (Feature 14).

    …
    … The New Testament is written in Greek. The Greeks had no separate symbols for expressing numbers, corresponding to our Arabic figures, but used instead the letters of their alphabet: just as the Hebrews, in whose language the Old Testament is written, made use for the same purpose of theirs. Accordingly, the 24 Greek letters stand for the following numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800. Every Greek word is thus a sum in arithmetic obtained by adding the numbers for which its letters stand, or their numeric values. Now the vocabulary to the entire genealogy has 72 words. If we write its numeric value over each of these 72 words, and add them, we get for their sum 42,364, or 6,052 sevens, distributed into the following alphabetical groups only: A-B, have 9,821, or 1,403 sevens: G-D, 1,904, or 272 sevens; 3,703, or 529 sevens; TH-R, 19,264, or 2,752 sevens; A-X 7,672, or 1,096 sevens. But the numeric value of the 10 letters used for making these groups is 931, or 7 x 7 x 19, a multiple not only of seven but of seven sevens.

    … The second part of this chapter, verses 18-25, relates the birth of the Christ. It consists of 161 words, or 23 sevens; occurring in 105 forms, or 15 sevens, with a vocabulary of 77 words or 11 sevens. Joseph is spoken to here by an angel. Accordingly, of the 77 words the angel uses 28 or 4 sevens; of the 105 forms he uses 35 or 5 sevens; the numeric value of the vocabulary is 52,605 or 7,515 sevens; of the forms, 65,429 or 9,347 sevens. This enumeration only begins as it were barely to scratch the surface of the numerics of this passage. But what is specially noteworthy here is the fact that the angel’s speech has also a scheme of sevens making it a kind of ring within a ring, a wheel within a wheel. If Mr. L. can write a similar passage of 161 words with the same scheme of sevens alone (though there are several others here) in some three years, he would have accomplished a still greater wonder. Let us assume that Matthew accomplished this feat in only 6 months.
    3. The second chapter of Matthew tells of the childhood of the Christ. Its vocabulary has 161 words, or 23 sevens, with 896 letters, or 128 sevens, and 238 forms, or 34 sevens; the numeric value of the vocabulary is 123,529 or 17, 647 sevens; of the forms, 166,985 or 23, 885 sevens; and so on through pages of enumeration. This chapter has at least four logical divisions, and each division shows alone the same phenomena found in the chapter as a whole. Thus the first six verses have a vocabulary of 56 words, or 8 sevens, etc. There are some speeches here: Herod speaks, the Magi speak, the angel speaks. But so pronounced are numeric phenomena here, that though there are as it were numerous rings within rings, and wheels within wheels, each is perfect in itself through forming all the while only part of the rest…

    4. There is not, however, a single paragraph of the scores in Matthew that is not constructed in exactly the same manner. Only with each additional paragraph the difficulty of constructing it increases not in arithmatical, but in geometrical progression. For he contrives to write his paragraphs so as to develop constantly fixed numeric relations to what goes before and after. Thus in his last chapter he contrives to use just 7 words not used by him before…

    Anyhow, Matthew did it, and we thus have a miracle – an unheard-or literary, mathematical artist, unequaled, hardly even conceivable…
    A second fact is yet more important: In his very first section, the genealogy discussed above, the words found nowhere else in the New Testament occur 42 times, 7 x 6; and have 126 letters, 7 x 6 x 3, each number a multiple not only of seven, but of 6 sevens, to name only two of the many numeric features of these words. But how did Matthew know, when designing this scheme for these words (whose sole characteristic is that they are found nowhere else in the New Testament) that they would not be found in the other 26 books? That they would not be used by the other 7 New Testament writers? Unless we assume the impossible hypothesis that he had an agreement with them to that effect, he must have had the rest of the New Testament before him when he wrote his book. The Gospel of Matthew, then, was written last.
    5. It so happens, however, that the Gospel of Mark shows the very same phenomena. Thus the very passage called so triumphantly in today’s SUN a ‘forgery,’ the Last Twelve Verses of Mark, presents among some sixty features of sevens the following phenomena: It has 175 words, or 25 sevens, a vocabulary of 98 words, or 2 sevens of sevens, with 553 letters, or 79 sevens; 133 forms, or 19 sevens, and so on to the minutest detail. Mark then, is another miracle, another unparalled literary genius. And in the same way in which it was shown that Matthew wrote last it is also shown that Mark, too, wrote last. Thus to take an example from this very passage: It has just one word found nowhere else in the New Testament, theta, alpha, nu, alpha, sigma, iota, upsilon, omicron, sigma, deadly. This fact is signaled by no less than seven features of sevens, thus: its numeric value is 581 or 83 sevens, with the sum of its figures 14, or 2 sevens, of which the letters 3, 5, 7, 9 from the beginning of the word have 490, or 7 x 7 x 5 x 2: a multiple of seven sevens, with the sum of its factors 21, or 3 sevens. In the vocabulary it is preceded by 42 words: 7 x 6; in the passage itself by 126 words, or 7 x 6 x 3, both numbers multiples not only of seven, but of 6 sevens. We have thus established before us this third fact for Mr. L. to contemplate: Matthew surely wrote after Mark, and Mark just as surely wrote after Matthew.
    6. It happens, however, to be a fourth fact that Luke presents the same phenomena as Matthew and Mark, and so does John, and James, and Peter, and Jude, and Paul. And we have thus no longer two great unheard-of mathematical literati, but eight of them and each wrote after the other.
    7. And not only this: As Luke and Peter wrote each 2 books, John 5, and Paul 14, it can in the same way be shown that each of the 27 New Testament books was written last. In fact, not a page of the over 500 in Wescott and Hort’s Greek edition (which the writer has used throughout) but it can be demonstrated thus to have been written last.
    The phenomena are there and there is no human way of explaining them. Eight men cannot each write last, 27 books, some 500 pages, cannot each be written last. But lets assume that one Mind directed the whole, and the problem is solved simply enough: by this Verbal Inspiration – of every jot and tittle of the New Testament.
    There remains only to be added that by precisely the same kind of evidence the Hebrew Old Testament is proved to be equally inspired. This the very first verse of Genesis has seven words, 28 letters, or 4 sevens: to name only two out of the dozens of numeric features of this one verse of only seven words.

    • Julie W

      Go on Youtube and watch Tom Horn’s channel Skywatch tv. He and other bible believers have been showing what the bible has warned us humans is to come, with more and more proof every day being dug up. L.A. Marzulli is another great Youtube channel that explains these things in detail.

    • Jason G

      This has been one of the BEST, Wes. Thank you for your open mindedness in exploring every aspect and leaving no stone unturned. This is one of many reasons that you are so cherished in this field/community. A TRUTH seeker in every way. Again, thank you!

  33. Mike T

    Sorry guys once the host, referred to God‘s actions as”” “maniacal behavior, “ I personally had to stop the interview, and I’ll wait for the next show and I’ll pray for Mr Wess , . He probably didn’t mean it in that content but it I listened to it several times so. Happy holidays to everyone merry Christmas and God bless..

    • Steven B

      Hi Mike

      Please listen further than that point to hear what Wes was really saying. Unfortunately, in stopping you inadvertently cut Wes off in mid-thought:

      “…when I very first started reading the Bible, I remember thinking, ‘Wow. The Old Testament God is hard core…and a little bit of a maniac…’ ”

      However, Wes goes on to say,”…but when you really look into what was going on then…and when you kinda start to understand, when the war was going on, you realize the people aren’t what you think they are and it wasn’t ‘genocide’ if you think it is.”

      In summation, Wes wasn’t saying God is maniacal. He is saying that it appeared that way to him when he f i r s t s t a r t e d to read the Bible and, in inference, he d o e s n o t see God that way now.

  36. Jason G

    This has been one of the BEST, Wes. Thank you for your open mindedness in exploring every aspect and leaving no stone unturned. This is one of many reasons that you are so cherished in this field/community. A TRUTH seeker in every way. Again, thank you!

  40. Ann Y

    Oh how history repeats its self.
    Now we know the attack on genes and our DNA.
    I’ve read the old testament many times and my mind is blown. I’ll never read it the same way!❤️🤯 Love it!

  41. Greg O

    Good show! Love Gary Wayne’s books! There are several possibilities in the bible to explain Sasquatch existence and a couple more if you add the extra non-canonical texts. Nephilim/Gibbor/Rephaim/lion like men/Esau/Cain. I think there may be mimicking going on by the darkside. My 2 sightings that lasted for hrs did not have any woo.

  46. NHSquatcher

    Why the heck does it have to be anything related to the Bible? Why can’t it just be an animal that is here that no one has admitted exists? I mean look how they found the coelacanth after so many millions of years?

  49. David M

    its hard enough believing everyone’s encounters who mostly sound very credible on your show but when you chuck in religion im out. thou I dont doubt that there were giants in those times you only have to learn about the different hominids that walked the earth. I doubt they new jesus tho.

  52. Jason

    It would be really interesting if I had read the books. Hard to follow without the pre-historical storylines. It is very intriguing. Makes you want to learn more.

  54. Justin J

    did not much like the first book, too many mistakes. Gary’s theory that it was not sodomy but the desire to create a super race that caused God to destroy them is likely wrong also. The city of of Sodom was so disgusting, Abraham stayed away from it, and dared not be blessed by them (he did not want to be indebted to them in any way). There is nothing supernatural about the battle of four armies. In Jasher, the abject insanity of the Sodomites is partially chronicled. The Sodomites were insane because of their sexual practices. So overall it was Sodomy that caused God’s wrath.

    Modern LGBTQetc seem to believe strongly in ‘transformation’ through sex. Probably the ancient Sodomites had the same idea, because sexual immorality destroys the body, they developed the belief that they were ‘transforming’ themselves. Sodom and Gomorrah was an ancient version of today’s porn industry. People in this industry are often deeply involved in the occult, so that is the connection.

  55. Matthew W

    Anyone trying to take the stories in the bible literally, as though they really occurred, like Noah’s ark or giants, rather than teaching parables, is missing the forest because of all the trees. Even worse are those who view the bible as justification for hating, condemning or killing those different from themselves. I support everyone’s right to believe what they will, but that doesn’t mean I support bigots and haters who twist their beliefs to justify hate or some conception of moral superiority. It seems that any discussion about the bible, including this author’s interesting views, somehow gives license to the haters. SQC is a much more inviting place to visit when the focus is on cryptids instead of religion.

  57. Travis C

    I really appreciate how Wes is open to every explanation. it just seems like a more mature approach to the topic. Great episode, can’t thank Gary and Wes enough for taking the time to record this episode.

  58. Nancy R

    Interesting interview.
    Did you read the second book? ,) Ordering both books. Origin of Man is always fascinating. And, we always want guidance for the future learning from the past.

  60. Mariajose B

    Hi Wes, I really enjoyed this interview and I will buy Gary Wayne’s books–very interesting topic. I have read Joseph B. Lumpkin’s “Fallen Angels, the Watchers, and the Origins of Evil” along this same topic. I was brought up Catholic, but this information is not taught.

  61. Tim N

    Sorry I can only make it 20 minutes. Another talking head about made-up crap with plagiarism thrown in. If there is such a loving caring god answer me this, why does he allow millions of children to die of starvation. If that is how he shows love then he is cruel, vengeful, shellfish, and doesn’t care about you. After all, are we not made of his image.

    • JT V

      “Bad things happen, there is no God” is the most dull-witted cognition that atheists think is checkmate. How do you know its bad? By what standard to you make your judgment of bad or good? Ill wait for your brain-dead response.

      • Tim N

        and to all the blind god lovers JTV says how do you know what is bad. why don’t you enlighten me with plagiarized stories written by people who think the earth is flat and sacrificing a baby on an alter will help your crops grow. i will wait for you to look through your book or does common sense mean anything.

  62. JT V

    Sorry, Wes you are wrong about Sodom and Gomorrah not being about God hating homosexuality. Let’s let the Bible comment on the Bible: “Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable.” Leviticus 20:13. What would be more appropriate in light of this interview would be to say God hates homosexuality because the Giants practiced it and spread the abomination around the world.

    • Tim N

      i thought it was only the democrats that hate homosexuals. no maybe they hate affordable living and electric cars. what am i supposed to love someone please tell me what to think?

  63. Jennifer H

    I love when you have Gary on the show! This makes things really make sense to me, more than anything else I’ve heard. I’ve came a long way in my understanding of what Bigfoot really is. Thank you Gary

  66. Michael H

    Leviticus condemns homosexual acts with pagan temple prostitutes and with young boys, as it should.

    I believe Jesus spoke very directly about homosexuals and to homosexuals in Matthew 19:10-12. His disciples ask him whether all men should marry. He then gives a teaching that he says not everyone will be able to understand, and he refers to “eunuchs.. so born from the womb of their mothers.” In other words, men who, when they’re born, are already in a state where they’re not going to have children, and should not marry women. Who else could he possibly be describing but homosexuals? But men love the doctrines of men, not of God, which is why this passage is ignored.

    Matthew 19:10-12 KJV

    His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

  67. Paula B

    This guy need to go back and read the fact that men wanted the angels that they thought were men and Lot offered them his two daughters. Stop trying to add to the story.
    Wes, God hates sin. Yes, he hates man laying with man and women laying with women.
    What you are saying to me you. Don’t have a personally relationship with Jesus!
    Not listening to this man or you anymore please unsubscribe me!

  68. Juli W

    The “nay-sayers” always crack me up. Instantly call BS. Have you spent ANY time in research? But you got it figured out. Thousands of theologians and centuries of work is all BS, because Joe-blow says it’s BS. 🙂 Ok, guys. You crack me up. This was a good episode, and I’ve added the book to my book list. Thanks Wes!

  69. Lori C

    Just ordered your first book on Giants, Mr. Wayne. Fascinating subject and I’m so excited to dive into the history of the Giants and the Israelites. Adding depth to my faith in the God of the Bible is a good thing. Thank you for having Gary Wayne on your show, Wes!

  70. Donald T

    I’ve been a member now going on my second year. I’ve listened to hundreds of shows. This is the first one I turned off before the end. It was way too complicated for me.

  75. Michael H

    There is absolute, concrete, scientifically examined and verified physical evidence for the death and miraculous resurrection of Jesus Christ. You don’t know the whole story behind it because the antichrist – a seat of power not one person – himself owns it. It is the Shroud of Turin. Watch the video “Shroud of Turin March 2014 with Dr. Wayne Philips.” It will confound even the most hardened athiest, if only you can get them to take 1 hour to watch it.

  76. Conor O

    Jesus was neither Christian nor white….. he was woke and loved the poor and migrants. and also super left leaning. has anyone read the bible and seen this message in his words? he was not into hate or orange mussilinis…. interesting comments below from the so called faithful. I did however love the interview.

  79. Brandon M

    If you’re a member of the show and taking time to leave a comment, you’d think, at the very least, we are all open minded.. Opinions make the world go ’round and like Wes always says, “There’s no wrong answer.” Happy Holidays sasquatch squad…

  80. William D

    Hey Connor, imagine being lectured as to Who Jesus IS and NOT WAS by an individual like yourself who is part of a group who HATES and is INTOLERANT of everyone who doesn’t agree with THEM or fall in lockstep. Keep being a FOOL who is apparently deceived and on THAT Day you’ll find yourself laying prostrate before the Throne, after you leave this world . You’ll realize THEN you’ve been lied to you’re entire life FOOL. At that point it’ll be TOO LATE for tears and begging for forgiveness.

  81. Peter L

    garbage like this incites garbage peoples “responses”
    not a fan of nonsense that brings up responses like the ones you’re reading below. keep your Bible and god bs to yourselves people.

  82. Chuck L

    Wes, thank you for this show. extremely interesting, informative and in depth. When someone, like Gary, deep dives into religion and starts to formulate, not only answers, but other theories about the Bible, people get all up in arms. I was raised Catholic and always asked “why” when I didn’t understand something in the Bible. The answers I would receive would be “because” or “that’s how it was” This was one of my favorite shows. keep up the great work.

  85. Ron S

    If anyone finds themselves getting upset or angry at this episode or even lashing out at the positive comments about it, you may seriously want to stop and ask yourself “why?”.

    I’m not saying it’s impossible but it definitely should be a rare occurrence that anyone should suddenly have anger issues and feel compelled to chisel out their inner hate in cyber stone when it comes to someone else having faith or wanting to be a positive, supportive, more knowledgeable or better person.
    Wether you have faith or not, you should still have morals.

  90. Ruth A

    Absolutely fascinating show. I was blown away at how many negative comments there were though. We’re all listening to a “Bigfoot “ podcast, something that’s not supposed to exist but people are quick with negative comments when the one thing I admire so much about Wes and this show is he doesn’t belittle or judge his guests. He brings us information and knowledge others have gathered and we can choose what to do with it. Do we need to believe everything is the truth ? No but just take a page from Wes and respect what others have to say, and if you really don’t like it, turn it off and leave it be. Not one of us knows what the truth is and what shape or form it’ll take. Personally I thought it was an amazing episode. Thank you Wes and Gary.

  93. Mark H

    Fantastic interview Gary!
    Please come back and explain what you think that the Sasquatch are?
    Do you think they are Nephilim who had sex with primates or what?
    This is what we would love to hear more about.

  98. Julie W

    Folks, if you think the info shared in this episode was intense, just remember, God warns us>>
    Eph. 6. [12] For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
    This means rulers ARE the evil ones, and God also warns that ALL those evil doers in high places ‘will be drug out and killed by the citizens’.
    These days ARE coming. In the book of Daniel God says ‘only the WISE will UNDERSTAND and live’, UN BELIEVERS will NOT UNDERSTAND these things.

    Please go to Youtube and watch The Daniel Project from 2011. You will see a secular research docu on every single prophecy in the bible. You will see the ones factually fulfilled, how many there are left to fulfill, (not many) and what world events are TELLING US as we sit here.

    ANOTHER MIND BLOWER IS DAVID FLYNN’S BOOK, ‘The Temple At The Center of Time’.
    YOU WILL BE SO ASTONISHED AT WHAT HE FOUND NOT ONLY FROM THE TEMPLE ON EARTH, BUT MARS, CYDONIA, AND OTHER OUTER SPACE INFO THE ANCIENTS HAD ZERO WAY OF KNOWING BUT PUT IT IN THE TEMPLE!

    • Jon A

      High places isn’t what it means. God picks our rulers and we get what we deserve, that’s why we obey as long as they aren’t making us doing something ungodly. And you don’t have to be wise to believe in Jesus…just not ignorant and unwilling.

      General comment
      Everyone has a story of the flood because it was handed down Noah’s family tree. Duh.
      If you understand scripture you understand what’s happening. Listening to so many people evolutionists makes me sad for them.

      Dude..the caninites sacrificed their babies for 800 years…it was judgement. Just like what the US has been doing.

      If you don

  100. craig d

    We all love the tree stand encounters and suchlike and thats why we subscribe and listen, however episodes like these are a breath of fresh air and get ye ole grey matter a workin.
    I love fringe topics and id love more of them. I know the show is called Sasquatch Chronicles but an occasional episode is – at least from me very much appreciated. Thank you Wes and keep up the good work.

  101. DIDIER T

    He’s looking at a whole range of Eurasian-specific creation myths which come from a period of deep time stretching back at least 11.500 years ago (when the ice age glaciers began to retreat north) if not longer. So that’s going back to at least 8500 BC.

    Giants, relating to those type of anciently recieved texts, has much metaphoric property, related to the oral tradition of passing on social culture and mainting social power. So giants underline the notion of greatness associated with power bestowed upon aristocratic and cheften dynasties in an animistic age of magical belief which ocnsists of many modes of speaking.

    The language ie the words and their interconnectedness being studied is a produce of the organisation and control of the power of knowldge, which has it’s roots in preisthoods and spiritual or magical healing roles in ancient cultures. It’s not actually reflective of the quantity of toungues which were spoken at all. In mythology , the Egyption God Thoth invents text as a cure against forgetting. But it’s considered a pharmakon ( a cursed cure) because it also creates forgetting as cultures switch from oral cultures to textual cultures. But again these are cultural reflections of control, power and authority as it develops in the hand of dynastic rulers so it serves their own glory.

    Also, we know today that the pre-history giants in ancient greek myth, from which the Pantheon of Greek Gods is dervied and most famoulsy known by the giant Cycolpes is actually an explanation for ancient Greek discovery of dinasour bones found at deep levels close to mountain ranges in northern main land Greece. It is their attempt to explain the size and shape of the giant bones they found. The hurling of mountains the giants did in their giant wars is an explanation of how the giant remains were found at the base of large mountains and under the earth.

    So if the occurance of giants in ancient text has many applications and possibilities, it’s a bit diffiuclt to understand what kind of jusitifcation their is for simply interpreting the occurance of the mention of giants in many ancient myths only in terms of species or trees of interbreeding over sized races ? It constructs an adventure narrative in the style of the fabulised story telling which characterises origin myths but to what end ? Does it distort the practice of ancient textual scholasticism ? I understand that there are elements of validity in the project as it is explained but wonder why it’s based on such a seemingly literal notion of giants rather than a more fluid notion. Is this a fundamental Christian methodology of interpretation or a selective acadmeic interpretation whose focus is a mit muddled ?

Leave a Reply