Nov 4

The Miller Document

This letter was sent to Linda Newton-Perry, you can find the original  link here.

I have some great researchers looking into this document. We are currently looking for additional researchers to help with the investigation. Mark Zaskey has agreed to come on the air and discuss this document and talk about additional help we are looking for. While we may never prove this document to be true It is an ongoing investigation.Take a look.

“Dear Linda,
I am not clear as to the best way to handle a manuscript written by my grandmother’s half – brother. He died in 2005. He had no children or relatives who live, except my grandmother. Apparently, he sent a box and left it in the box … Without my knowledge or my mother …. – It was in the attic of my grandmother since 2005. Amazing age of 92, my grandmother recently passed away and my mother and I were going through his things, found this manuscript. I do not know if it’s authentic, but I wanted to share with anyone who might know what to do with it. English is a second language. So I look to you, Linda, to be the nicest person on the internet now, when it comes to bigfoot, then I’ll send it to you. Written original manuscript is by hand and it has been neglected. So a friend transcribed it to write to you. I do not know what to do with the original, so we have sealed it by Ahora

You have full permission to read the manuscript below titled “The Following was written by Dr. H. A. Miller” on your you tube blog
Sincerely,
Sophia

The Following was written by Dr. H.A. Miller
(Now deceased)
Born in New England, December 12th, 1909… I was the first and only child of Christiana and Arthur Miller. My mother died in child birth and I was subsequently raised by my father until re-married to a French woman when I was 12 or 13 years of age. Soon after their marriage she bore a baby girl. I finished my high school education while living with my father, step-mother, and half-sister.
[There is an entire section here that I could not transcribe- Handwriting was illegible]
I remained in New England for my undergraduate work. I thoroughly enjoyed the outdoors, the ocean and forestry. My under-graduate studies focused on forestry and land management. While in my junior and senior year, I was employed by the Federal Government.

I worked at Lockwood Farm (part of The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station). I learned about hybridization in agricultural and enjoyed the hard outdoor work in the corn fields. I began to find great interest in the scientific workings happening with corn seed at the time.

I completed an additional year in Forestry science and graduated in 1930 with an A.B. from Yale University and an M.F. in 1931 (M.F. is a Master of Science in Forestry).

I labored at Lockwood Farm for a few years and gained great interest in science and medicine; by this time and I did hope to attend Medical School and become a physician. I expeditiously applied for Medical School and was accepted to Harvard and began my medical training in 1938.

Graduating from Harvard medical school (Harvard) in the early 1940s and I completed residency and fellowship at Harvard and began a very specialized career at the time in Orthopedic Forensic Surgery Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston.

Because of my previous work with the USDA, I was quickly employed by the federal government. My early years as a physician related mostly to providing medical support to various employee types (fire fighters, etc.) within the USDA/FS.

I also became the forensic expert and anatomist for the USDA and was called to examine most major accidental deaths of USDA/FS servicemen. Due to my interest in genetics and early experiences in agricultural hybridization, I was assigned to scientific teams, which investigated the physical nature of genetics.

Our early experiments determined that DNA is the component of the chromosomes where genetics should be studied; this, along with the efforts of several other scientists, lead to the discovery of the double helix structure in early 1950s.

It was at this same time that several of our team members were called to Bandera County, TX where the forestry scientists/biologists assigned to Edwards Plateau reported the dead bodies of a strange type of human. The first reports I received were speculating that they were feral humans from the local Comanche Indian tribes. The bodies were supposedly found in or around one of the massive caves within the Edwards Plateau area.

When I arrived in Texas, I was surprised to find 3 bodies; one adult female and two female juveniles. I examined them as I typically would any human subject. But to my dismay–one of these creatures still seemed to be alive. I became quite upset with the local scientists–but they reassured me that they confirmed all 3 were deceased.

After further investigation, I found that these creatures were not human. They, in fact, had a remarkable rapid reparative process (hence the reason one of the creatures seemed dead–but in fact was regenerating to a degree). Unfortunately the restorative abilities of the creature were not enough to keep it alive. They were massive in size and distinctly a new primate species unknown to science at the time.

I spent years studying these creatures (which are scientifically known as Cebidatelidae), confirming that they were most certainly not human; they were definitely of Primate origin, but with traits seen in various species of primate – most of which were New World monkey.

Cebidatelidae found in the San Antonio Texas area very much “howl” like a howler monkey (quite frightening to hear at night).  At one point early in my analysis, I found a great deal of similarity between these bigfoot creatures and the Howler Monkey- that was until 1962…..

In late 1962 early ’63 I was notified of a large human like creature by the Redding forest service folks in California. I arranged for transport of the body to my primary location in Colorado. It was reported to me that the body was found under a large tree that had been violently struck by lightning and blown to the ground, apparently killing this large creature.

During my investigation- I found the animal to be very similar to those I had studied in the Bandera County area of Texas, with some marked differences. This northern version of Cebidatelidae seemed to have the same new world monkey attributes I notated in the Texas animals (known today as Cebidatelidae texicanus or C. texicanus).

However, there were unique traits found in this Pacific Northwest animal (known today as Cebidatelidae nerteros pacificus or C. nerteros pacificus) including thumbs that are not entirely opposable, as we see in modern humans. C. nerteros pacificus entire hand was truly designed for grip, including proximal pads; making the hand somewhat hooked like, having flattened nails resulting in my theory that these northern creatures developed an evolutionary arboreal nature while the Texas sub-family developed a trogloxene nature.

This Pacific Northwest (PNW) creature found in 1962-63 also had scent glands on her forearms. This is more evidence that C. nerteros pacificus is arboreal to some extent, leaving sent marks up and down the tree while climbing.  Not only was this creature smashed by the large tree, but she was also badly burned with areas of lightning prints on exposed skin. I notated in my Medical Examination report of the body that it seemed as though lightning struck the animal passing through the body and into the tree; subsequently weakening the tree and causing it to fall to the ground.

It did seem as though the animal had fallen to the ground first, with the tree falling on top of her afterward- but the evidence as to whether the animal fell first or with the tree is inconclusive. However, it is clear lightning struck the tree at a decent height of over 20 feet; therefore this animal must have been clinging to the tree at the time of the lightning strike…. more evidence of the arboreal nature of C. nerteros pacificus.

C. nerteros pacificus also has additional medial padding on the feet, which it would use to climb trees by clinging to the tree with its hands and support its weight.

Both the C. nerteros pacificus and C. texicanus have oversized lower jaws, including massive sternocleidomastoid musculature. This must have been due to their rugged diet and, moreover, their need to crush bones. Their lower dentum at first looked as a second row of molars. But after years of research and examining the dead bodies of these animals, I have found that the lower molars are simply oversized or fused resulting in massive, bone crushing tools.

Due to their jaw size and bone crushing dentum, it is also clear that all sub-family of this creature are omnivorous, predacious and opportunistic.  We did find that the female killed during the Columbus Day storm was pregnant with monozygotic embryos. All female Cebidatelidae bodies I have investigated throughout my career that have been pregnant have monozygotic embryos; this again, incorporating additional evidence of a new world monkey relationship.

Due to my investigations of the 1950s bodies in Texas and the 1960s PNW Columbus day storm body- I submitted to the Department of Agriculture that this is a new Platyrrhini species and that a new family under the parvorder should be created. Fellow scientists of mine disagreed given the fact that the creatures we examined in both cases were obviously bipedal and catarrhini in terms of their nostrils facing downward (old world monkeys).

However, the juveniles we have examined are much more platyrrhini in terms of nostril breadth and position. I won the debate in the end due to the fact that no evidence thus far demonstrates that these creatures crossed over from the old world- but are simply new world monkeys adapting to their various staged areas within North and South America*.

I have since retired and I know of some new University of Utah based scientists and Idaho who understand the genetics a bit better. Their findings are only supporting my original theorems, or at least I am told. These molecular biologists will soon understand the similarities with humans- once the human genome project is completed. As a result, I still refer to the Sasquatch species as Cebidatelidae with the following subfamilies:
Cebidatelidae arktos
Cebidatelidae nerteros pacificus
Cebidatelidae somphos
Cebidatelidae americanus
Cebidatelidae texicanus
Cebidatelidae amazonia

*Any of these species found outside the New World must have originated from and migrated out of the new world.
All of my experience with this primate has been post-mortem, save a few unique experiences in the wild. To my knowledge a live specimen has never been captured except for once in Northern Research station in California. However, the animal did not survive in captivity and died after only several days.

I, of course, examined the body. There were many rumors that this captured “Sasquatch” was somehow magical and could shape shift and that is why it couldn’t be found. The truth is… the folks at Northern Research station were very devastated and embarrassed that this live specimen died so quickly after being in captivity. So no, they are not magical. They are highly intelligent primates.

Having one die in captivity is a very difficult to witness due to the human nature and feeling about the species. In reality, captivity will never be realistic for Cebidatelidae because of their size and complex brains. Similar to captive white sharks, the species cannot thrive in captivity and quickly die as a protective mechanism.

I have spent a great deal of my career as an expert for the federal government concerning Cebidatelidae and throughout the world, including the bodies recovered in the 80s due to Mount Saint Helen eruption. We made many recommendations to protect the species, but the DOI has constant concern regarding the impact of such a decision due to the vast number of areas this species inhabits. Such a decision would have potential negative impacts on the natural resource industry. The USFS is now working more toward creating protective wildlife refuges for Cebidatelidae.
[There is an entire section here that I could not transcribe- Handwriting was illegible]
…others on the team focused on molecular genetics….
[There is an entire section here that I could not transcribe- Handwriting was illegible]
…. the USFS and the DOI is recognizing now that the natural resource industry is not the economic center as it once was. So a final decision has been made to finalize the class 1 identification of the species. There is a 20 year plan to incorporate all wildlife protection areas throughout many areas of the United States to ensure federal land protection for Cebidatelidae starting with California, Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.

I was upset by this decision because the first location the species was identified scientifically was Texas. I petitioned and as a result, the Government Canyon State Natural Area will be protected, opened to the public and expanded in Bexar County, TX. The long-term plan will be to open each of these designated “Natural Areas” to the public. Once all of the designated Cebidatelidae “Natural Areas” are open to the public, the DOI will announce the species as an endangered New World Primate. I am not sure if this will happen, and the Government Canyon State Natural Area will not be open to the public until 2005 and then expanded later in 2009, and then again in 2012. This will all happen long after I am dead I’m afraid.

I am currently still living in Colorado and I have attempted to journal my experience with the discovery of this new massive primate. The species is amazing, powerful, and deadly if angered. Like any animal, it will protect itself, its food source and its young at all cost. Artiodactyla are Cebidatelidaes’ primary food source. It is imperative that the federal government continue to designate “Natural Areas”. Otherwise, a scarce food resource available to Cebidatelidae will result in more opportunistic feeding behavior and closer interaction between Humans and Cebidatelidae. These creatures and human beings simply do not co-exist.
H.A. Miller, MD, PhD (Now deceased)
Influenced by the writings of Anatomist Dr. Thomas Dwight among which includes: “Frozen Sections of a Child” (1872); “Clinical Atlas of Variations of the Bones of the Hands and Feet” (1907); “Thoughts of a Catholic Anatomist” (1911)”

81 Responses to “The Miller Document”

  1. Christine J S

    So glad to see this topic get moved to the front of the line! I would love to know if the GOVERNMENT LAND GRAB outlined by Dr Miller is true/false. Thank you Wes for getting our guys some help with this research (Tracy A; Chris422; others).

  2. Manuel A

    Amazing find Wes!:)!
    “Redding forest service folks in California”…
    Wow! That is next to Chico, Ca. where I’m from.
    “So no, they are not magical. They are highly intelligent primates”…
    My thoughts as well.
    “These creatures and human beings simply do not co-exist”…
    Understandably true.

    Deb~

  3. michael n

    This document is amazing! It reads as true to me but that means nothing. There is an awful lot of info in there that seems hard to hoax or imagine up. I hope this is real! Go get ’em Tracy,Chris,and everyone else that are researching this. Godspeed!!

    • darren w

      While 99% of this has, to me at least, the ring of truth, there is one part that immediately struck me as odd. It all seems very scientific and professional sounding but when he talks about the similarities to the howler monkey he just nonchalantly refers to them as “bigfoot creatures” without any prior interjection about a possible connection the “legend” of bigfoot.

      • Steven W

        It seems a little odd that there is no mention of the hair or hair color, or the size of the feet, that is mentioned so frequently by people that see them and cast prints. But there was descriptions of the hands, jaw, teeth, and nostrils. I do think these creatures are alive and very dangerous.

        • Scott

          One more thing to keep in mind is that there is a part of this writing that could not be translated. We really are only getting part of a whole. We have no idea how much valued information we didn’t get.

      • Patricia R

        This man was a professional, not an average citizen who is so traumatized by seeing a live one, often didn’t even know they existed before this fearful sight, and who has trouble finding the words to describe an animal they never knew existed at all, much less in a way that a biologist or doctor would.
        Also, this man has had years to think about it and digest it all before this document was written so I think his use of one or two odd sounding words (to our currently used words–) doesn’t disqualify his account.

  4. randolph w

    This entire document is so very interesting, and so very x – FILES I don’t know what to believe until more comes out. Can’t wait for some follow up, I would love for this to be a real document.

  5. Justin B

    You have to remember it is also translated so it might not be nonchalantly referred too. I am from Redding Ca, and there are large numbers in the trinity national forest. And also the Mt. Shasta national forest. My family have hunted and had encounters. There is millions of miles of heavily wooded area. Hoopa Valley is spooky because you know they are there.

  6. craig b

    I live 5 miles from government canyon park in San Antonio and I ride my mountain bike there. I’ll look for sign. Never thought to before because it’s so close to major metro development. Crazy.

  7. Luis G

    I still think they’re shape shifter. Why would the folks at the northern research station make that up to avoid embarrassment? This guy only examined dead ones so how would he know anyways?

  8. Amy N

    I’m suspicious…
    When did it become common to use the term Sasquatch? Also when did the whole shape shifting bs come about? If this old timer is legit; then this document must have been written prior to the above.
    Also finding the grandmothers half brother scenario a little too distant to easily believe ?

  9. Rob C

    When I think of a manuscript, a novel or work of fiction comes to mind. I agree with “regenerative process” being a red flag also. Sounds like a premise to Hollywood story. Still very interesting though.

  10. Danny T

    I question how quickly the one died in captivity and how he compared it to the Great Whites inability to cope when contained. I’ve seen many apes in captivity that survive and even humans survive in prison so why would Bigfoot be that different?
    From a social view (no others to react with) I could see it waste away over time but this “document” says it died in several days.
    Weird to me.

  11. David D

    I’m not at all the best writer out there, but be careful. Everyone would do well to read Frank Peretti’s “Monster”. Even though the book is said to be work of fiction, there is a great deal of factual material in his work; it’s a great read! Blessings to all.

  12. Melanie W

    “These molecular biologists will soon understand the similarities with humans- once the human genome project is completed.” The Human Genome Project started in 1990, but was being discussed in 1989, and ended in 2003, if my Google searches are accurate. That means this document (if real) was written between 1990 and 2003. The supposed author died in 2005, so this would have been written at least two years prior to his death.

    I wonder if there is a date for this document… Anyone notice info about this?

  13. r v

    Meh. I think it’s a test aimed at the community at large by someone with trying to sound scientific. It’s called Google and Wikipedia. The Biosphere rumors have popped up in there along with the so-in-fashion Texas hot spots. Why not just say “deer” instead of “Artiodactyla”? Unless BF eat water buffalo as well. My BS meter is sounding off. Convenient that the guy wasn’t all that committed to getting out the whole story to the world by watching his legibility as well. Articulate, articulate, articulate, unintelligible, articulate, scribbled in hard-to-make-out-handwriting, articulate, illegible… (Makes raspberry sound).

    Excuse me while I go fry up some Capsicum annuum to eat with my Artiodactyla burger.

    • Elise B

      This is quite possible. The science terminology is pretty adept, but some scientific names are BS. If it’s a test, then the test mostly shows that the hoaxer is obsessed with the topic in an unhealthy way and is a dishonest broker. That readers would believe it to be authentic demonstrates that it is a credible and elaborate effort, if a hoax, and any gullibility of readers is offset by the goofiness of concocting such documents.

  14. Melanie W

    Found this link to what seems to be the Yale alumni listing with photos… However, H.A. Miller is the only name listed in the photo with anything more than a sur name. Same for 1929 and 1931, all listed with just sur name. That’s a red flag for me, and I will remain skeptical… Unless something more concrete is found. (I may sound paranoid, but web sites can be hacked and images manipulated.)

  15. Kim

    Ive read this before also, so happy that everyone is now on the ball.
    If this was a few years before his death his script would be very illegible. Where are his journals, if any? I wonder what else was in that attic. Any souvenirs? Bits and pieces? It doesn’t quite seem he was a “company man”.
    so many question’s!

  16. mark s

    Like Tracy said if you compare the Miller doc. and Man with arm bit off post they match up with a lot pertinent information that helps the legitimacy of the document.

  17. Kay S

    ‘Reparative Process’ and ‘Regenerating, to a degree’. I know many reptiles, mostly crocodiles and alligators have this ability, I think because of a natural antibiotic in their blood, but I have never heard of warm blooded mammals having the same ability. Wow! If this is true, just imagine what this could mean to science, medicine, and unfortunately, war. No wonder the government doesn’t want Bigfoot ‘found’.

  18. mark s

    You hear about BF, and dogmen , get shot multiple times, but they get up after and run away, makes you think about this ability to repair itself, like it already has enough amazing attributes and can do this aswell.

  19. Elmer Fudd

    I don’t buy it. A lifetime of work in science researching genetics and these creatures and that’s his legacy? A couple of pages of oversimplified data that adds nothing to what we already know other than some made up binomial nomenclature. I am sorry but that is not how someone trained in science writes or documents anything. The work of a simpleton, don’t fall for it.

  20. Jan W

    There are two names listed in the Yale photo with more than surnames, both Millers. So the first initials of both Millers were added to distinguish the two.

  21. Jan W

    Dr.Meldrum is a “she” and after the beating she has taken over her BF DNA analysis, I would be stunned to hear that she ridiculed another’s research. Very anxious to see what she said about the Miller document.

  22. Eddie M

    I would suggest the man wrote this in late stages of life probably in late 1900′ s early 2000’s I’d guess. The hand writing at that age would have been a bit shaky…and terms that he used would have long been in common use. If it’s a hoax it is a good one. I choose to want to believe I guess because of the terminology and the biographical info. The notation regarding the hands and thumbs…he seemed genuinely delighted to have named a new primate and done the study. Even mentioned his fellow scientist arguing the New World vs. Old World Primate. So many stories regarding wild fire incidents and finding living subjects that I heard before there was a S.C. I believe government employed forensic experts have done autopsies because I believe they’ve had killed specimens to do the autopsies on via their on kill teams. Mr. Garret talks about it. Jim Grant spoke of it regarding a fire in Nevada. So did Tim Baker regarding the cave on his farm in Northwest Alabama and the Government putting up a fence (to protect the breeding of gray bats) that was torn down multiple times from the inside out. As long as this subject is suppose to be taboo and does not exist we will have people that are assigned to make a joke of the subject…I think beginning with episode 67 there are some here. This is not a wascally wabbit.

  23. Jan W

    Ong! I am so sorry and obviously been wake too many hours. I confused Medrum with Ketchum-so sorry about that. I am going to sleep now and won’t comment again unless I have 8 hours of shut eye! Night all!

  24. James B

    I wonder if any of this info has been shown to National geographic or even get it to Les Stroud, So it can get to people to believe in what most of us has seen or heard or even felt.

  25. Larry W

    TOTAL B.S.! Not a question in my mind.

    When a new species is discovered and named, there are abstracts that are published in professional journals. These journals have been around a LONG time, a lot longer than this guy has been around. There would also be a specimens made available for other scientists to study and research. You just don’t find a new species and say “hmm, I think I’ll call it Cebidatelidae texicanus and be done with it.” How would all the others that supposedly were also in the genus Cebidatelidae come to their classifications if there was no scientific journal abstract published? He’s got a whole list of different species in this genera. Did he, or the guy that named the first one, also find all those as well and name them accordingly?

    How would he know how scary Cebidatelidae texicanus was at night?

    Those interested in solving this mystery once and for all, need to stop being so gullible.

  26. larry b

    These creatures use the many rivers to get from place to place here in Texas. Highly aquatic. The legend of LA Llorona ” the crying woman ” comes from these creatures and their lives near the water

  27. Lee D

    Hi. Im a new member. I found this pod cast last fall after some sightings i have had in the area i moved to last year and currently live in. This is a pretty amazing document. Never heard of it until i heard it on here. Anywayz… What is the exact name of the other document mentioned. Whitmore doc. Wetmore? Jw so i can also look up and read that one. Anyone who can help i would appreciate it. Thank you.

Leave a Reply