Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Nov 5

The Wentsworth Document

Tracy, Joe, Mark, Chris and Pam have been working really hard on the Miller Document trying to figure out if it is legit or not. While I think it is impossible to prove it to be 100% legit because we do not have the original document and the author has passed away there are a lot of clues that point to this being real. This is an ongoing investigation and we are looking for volunteers to assist. If you are interested please contact me.

This is communication back and forth:

The following is more information about a biologist who worked at times with Dr. Miller. Miller has been mentioned in earlier posts on this site. He examined the dead Columbus Day animal’s body, three bigfoot-like animals found in a Texas cave in the past and bigfoot’s from the Mt. St. Helen’s eruption. Actually Aly’s grandmother, Evelyn N. Wentsworth, called Dr. Miller in to look at the three bigfoot animals from the Texas cave. Scroll down to find the first information received on Wentsworth. Enjoy and comment.
________________________________________

Dear Mrs Perry,
Mother brought to me some old notes from mormor. I have typed as best I can for your YouTube magazine. I hope it makes sense to you. It makes no sense to me.
I have more notes. I will work on them if this is helpful to you and your science.
Aly
—
Journaling notes: 1960
Notes regarding the New World Ape: evolution from Monkey to Apes to the bipedal higher order.
What connection in North America to such an anomaly? Notharctus venticolus?
Must contact Harrup. Examination at Yale – Natural history
Ms. Leakey discovery seemingly indicates a creature that may be bipedal. In contacting Mary, I found her very open to such similar evolutionary history in the Americas. Hopefully she will visit with us, though she very much dislikes Dr. Miller. She has requested to examine the skeletal anatomy. This meeting has been too difficult to sally forth and may never happen, unfortunately.
Questions and Concerns:

Dental Formula (Diphyodont.)
2.1.3.2-3
2.1.3.2-3

Adaptation to Open Habitats in the American landscape. Seemingly American transition approximately 3 million years ago from monkey to APE and onto a higher order of bipedal ape similar to Zinjanthropus boisei. Climate changes in the Americas 3 million years ago forced the arboreal nature of new world monkeys to a terrestrial habitat. Did this event result in a new ape evolutionary pattern in the Americas? The species utilize tools (stones) for food gathering and processing, meat eaters as well as plant and fruits. Migratory in nature.

To support Dr. Miller theorums, we examine Rusconi’s work. Homunculus was discovered in the new world with traits that demonstrate parallel evolution (potentially) due to a change in olfactory usage and increase binocular reliance. Dr. Miller uses this example as a similar evoluationary pattern in the new world to those primates in the old world. However, my question is to whether the changes in Homunculus is due to transitions from nocturnal living.
1972

For my own journaling, I will not refer to this new species as Cebidatelidae due to insufficient data provided. I do, however, agree this new world ape species is remarkably divergent and maintains features from all primate suborders. For my own purposes, I reference the species as Primus. Dr. Miller maintains his approach, of which I cannot ascribe. I will adopt my own. Primus arktos has now been discovered. First encounter as I have written about previously occurred two years ago when fossil remains were obtained in Nunavut of an early Primus specimen. Our dating of the specimen indicates 70,000 years ago indicating continued support of the great American ape theory. If this fossil evidence is confirmed as existing earlier than the land bridge, we know Primus did not migrate from Asia. The legends of Yeti in nepal are most likely sightings of P. arktos, which would have migrated out of North America and into Asia. P. arktos is very large, and is in fact the largest know of the Primus species. It is larger than P. nerteros pacificus, P. somphos, P. amazonia, and P. texicanus. It is most similar to P. americanus. The species outer coat is very white- similar to arctic foxes and polar bears. P. arktos seemingly feeds on large arctic mammals including arctic cetaceans, pinnipeds, but mostly Caribou. Like all Primus species, the arktos particularly hunt deer, such as caribou.

Primus arktos, and americanus subtype maintain (unusually so) some prosimian traits (rhinarium in americanus).
Biochemically closer to Prosimians
-arktos and americanus more reliant on smell than vision
– nerteros pacificus maintains forearm scent glads
-somphos, texicanus, and amazonia have significant arm pit scent glads (extremely pungent smell)

All Primus species are similarly American monkey in the following two ways a) twin births; b) paternal involvement in infant rearing

26 Responses to “The Wentsworth Document”

    • Tracy A

      They all track and are in context. Its classification disagreement journaling. Miller in the last para. of his doc. ……I don’t care what they say I’m sill referring to them as….. professional comp/pride/credit at some point. I would luv it if somebody found Harrup!!!

  3. pam

    She starts by using mormor- it is Swedish for Grandma, mentions they are migratory and there is the ever present disgareement between scientists about how to name the creatures.

  5. Steven B

    I’m not a Taxonomist but I’m partial to my Latin name for the critter:

    Family: Hominidae
    Sub-Family: Homininae
    (after this point I’m on my own )
    Tribe: Belluae
    Genus: Cotis Jactus (Sasquatch)

    Best I could do with the Latin, Tribe: “Hairy Monster” and Genus: Throws Rocks

    😉

  7. JOHN E

    WELL THANKS EVERYBODY FOR THE INFO ….IN MY BOOK ALL THIS AND MORE PROBABLY DID HAPPEN DARN GOVERNMENT … A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF THE HUSH HUSH .

    • Tracy A

      Tracy A

      They all track and are in context. Its classification disagreement journaling. Miller in the last para. of his doc. ……I don’t care what they say I’m sill referring to them as….. professional comp/pride/credit at some point. I would luv it if somebody found Harrup!!!

  10. Six

    I’d be happy to offer up my services as a Skeptic. I”ve been lurking on the Miller doc Evidence page since the beginning.
    I actually put in a lot of hours looking thru Census data and genealogy. records. I am 90% leaning towards hoax, but hey, I’m reasonable..

    • Tracy A

      Really…is it the amount of work it take to produce 4 Docs. that correlate? The intelligence one would possess to use all the terms in context?? All the terms in context of the attempt to classify of an unknown primate or the obscure references? The back and forth classification reasoning are in context and proper terms are used. Oh and all the DOZENS OF ancillary facts that are not needed to perpetrate the hoax…Lockwood…corn…an old class pic that happens to have a guy that we cant find past that pic.. Is it the use of dental classification terms that gave you the clue? The fact that after all that work by an obviously intelligent person that got all the facts/scientific terms, reasoning to make it the greatest hoax ever…he posted it on BFF. That’s like an arsonist lighting a building with a fire extinguisher…not much bang for your buck! Here’s my email bestoutdoorbar@gmail.com if you care to convince me….IF IT’S NOT A HOAX…WHATS LEFT??

  11. joe r

    I have a genealogy expert working on the Miller document, unfortunately as you can see, the only person really to track is the step sister of Miller, she called me a little while ago and said she found some stuff, what i don’t know, she said she would go over it when she was done. I gave her the info on the granddaughter as well, Aly, so maybe something will turn up there.

    • Tracy A

      Actually all the names that are ghosted WILL BE RUN TO GROUND. THE THREE THAT WERE MENTIONED ACTUALLY IN EXAM POSITION….Miller/Wentsworth/Harrup huh…go figure.

  12. joe r

    Six, If Doctor Miller were alive and sitting in front of Wes being interviewed and Miller was explaining all the work in fine detail, there would still be people coming forward saying the whole thing is a hoax, Even a body laying on a table for everyone to see would still not be enough.

  13. Elise B

    That Rusconi reference is pretty darned obscure to appear in a forgery or fake. This guy studied primate evolution in, get this, Patagonia. New world monkey ape. He found at least on Miocene species, and Miocene is relatively recent. http://digimorph.org/specimens/Tremacebus_harringtoni/

    Nerteros is Greek for lower or infernal (hellish).

    I worry these docs are too good to be true, though. On the other hand, many of the scientific names used are largely nonsense. Ain’t no primus and so on.

  14. Rob N

    Not directly related but this is maybe interesting as Greenland is a part of the Americas. This link relates to bones found in Greenland of ‘Homo Gardarensis’. It says this was disproven and they were instead said to be from a human who suffered from acromegaly. But that is a very rare condition (1 in 20,000) . How unlikely is that from 12th century Greenland? The first neanderthal bones found were also thought to be from a diseased individual from the recent past.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_gardarensis

    • Tracy A

      Perhaps more related than you think Rob

      “First encounter as I have written about previously occurred two years ago when fossil remains were obtained in Nunavut of an early Primus specimen. Our dating of the specimen indicates 70,000 years ago indicating continued support of the great American ape theory. If this fossil evidence is confirmed as existing earlier than the land bridge, we know Primus did not migrate from Asia.”

  15. Kay S

    I feel that to invent detail in the Miller document would be hard enough to hoax, but to invent the corresponding Wentsworth one as well would be a logistical nightmare. No, these must be real. It’s just Miller’s regeneration theory I’m struggling with.
    Logically it does not seem possible in a mammal.

  16. Jan W

    The regeneration issue seems to be baffling to many. Is this because we have never known of a mammal to possess this type of regenerative capability? We still know so little about the world around us that it is critical to keep an open mind. I think these creatures may have many amazing characteristics unknown to us and some type of regenerative process could be one of them.

Leave a Reply