Sep 9

SC EP:1188 It Was Not A Sasquatch

Shannon writes “Yesterday, while being a passenger in our side by side, I saw something in the woods.. between Grisdale & Satsop campground area. There’s a dry river bed area in there and a few campers spotted down on the open rocks camping.

As we were headed back towards where our trucks were parked, I saw something lanky, long haired and black with large pieces of olive green moss stick in the mats of it’s ribcage/stomach & left back hip area. It had a dog like face and cat-like reflexes as it twisted in mid-air and sprung off a large old snag. It was about 50 feet in the woods. The animal pushed it’s front upper torso away from the snag and in the air twisted & then let go with it’s back legs/feet and landed on all fours. It was long, like 6 or 7 foot long, thin build & it appeared to have hands and long feet.

I immediately said to Brandon in our headphones “…uhh- what the heck was that??? Hun, I just saw something. Like, a weird something…” Last night I had a scary dream that woke me up & I was afraid to go back to sleep because I didn’t want to be back in the dream, but this morning it bothered me so much I needed to draw it. I looked up Google images to understand things that looked like it. But nothing is coming up except a “dogman”??. (Some cryptid scary animal thing) looked like a long haired black Irish wolfhound mixed with an all black long haired sloth bear. I’ve never seen a long haired skinny black bear with cat like reflexes.. but ya.. No idea what it was- but I’m never camping there. That’s for sure.

It didn’t hv a neck like a dog, but the whole back half looked like a dire wolf or at least a very large canine look to it. No idea. So hard to explain it though. I’m chalking it up as a really long haired sickly black bear.”

 

We will also be speaking to Elijah. Elijah is from Virginia and back in the 1980’s he was 15 years old staying at a friends cabin. His friend left and was in an accident and did not return for a couple of days. During this time, he ran intro something with red glowing eyes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stream Player

 

Open New Player Window

72 Responses to “SC EP:1188 It Was Not A Sasquatch”

  1. Christina B

    Absolutely one of my favorite accounts. I’m fascinated with these creatures but pray I never see one… there are just so many detailed credible accounts like this one and it just makes me wonder… what in the ?!$

  2. Chad W

    I very much enjoyed this bonus episode! Shannon’s sighting is so bizarre – I wouldn’t want to meet that creature in a dark alley, lol. And Elijah’s experience is fascinating to me. I’ve been in that part of Virginia many times. It’s rugged, wooded, and beautiful.

  3. Sean O.

    We all know there are wolf Indians I saw the otter people. Not government but the government would have some to experiment on. I think we need to look at these things with a biblical lens on.

  4. PNW Girl

    Wes, there is not a night in the past 3 years that I have not listened to the show… thank you so much! And ya… I’m not too thrilled the dog men are out here as well 🙁

    • Karla G

      Pareidolia. People have got to stop zooming in on pictures to see what all they can find. Pareidolia is a real, scientifically explainable phenomena and you’re always going to find something if you’re looking for it. And unless you saw it with your own eyeballs in real time, it really has no evidentiary value anyway, because of pareidolia. I once did an experiment and I went out and my backyard and took a picture of the tiny island of trees in my backyard, posted it, didn’t tell anybody that it was in my backyard in the suburbs, told people that I took it out in the woods in the National Forest and people came out of the woodwork immediately with all of the different Sasquatch they saw in the picture. I could see what they were talking about and some of them, one in particular, was VERY convincing, but what they didn’t know was that it was in the suburbs in Florida, in a 12×12 island of trees. There was nothing there. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch a Sasquatch in a picture, but unless it’s something you saw with your own eyes and then snapped it, it’s very unlikely.

    • Karla G

      Pareidolia. People have got to stop zooming in on pictures to see what all they can find. Pareidolia is a real, scientifically explainable phenomena and you’re always going to find something if you’re looking for it. And unless you saw it with your own eyeballs in real time, it really has no evidentiary value anyway, because of pareidolia. I once did an experiment and I went out and my backyard and took a picture of the tiny island of trees in my backyard, posted it, didn’t tell anybody that it was in my backyard in the suburbs, told people that I took it out in the woods in the National Forest and people came out of the woodwork immediately with all of the different Sasquatch they saw in the picture. I could see what they were talking about and some of them, one in particular, was VERY convincing, but what they didn’t know was that it was in the suburbs in Florida, in a 12×12 island of trees. There was nothing there. I’m not saying it’s impossible to catch a Sasquatch in a picture, but unless it’s something you saw with your own eyes and then snapped it, it’s very unlikely.

      • Tyler O

        Agreed. Good story but unfortunately this person saw a bear climbing a tree (which is quite obvious from the witnesses drawing of the “creature”) and the photos are just a stump.

    • Karla G

      😂 SAME!!! That’s all I was worried about as soon as he mentioned puppies!!! It’s funny because I was just telling my employer yesterday about how I will hear a news report about (for example) a family and their dog disappearing on a hike, and they will report about the family being found either dead or alive or whatever, and my only response is, “But did the dog survive??!” LOL

  5. Karla G

    with regards to the comment she made, “it wasn’t a sasquatch. it wasn’t huge and bulky.” not all Sasquatch are huge, they have to be youngsters at some point, and they’re not all bulky either. a lot of people say that they are small, maybe either potentially malnourished, and there are all different types reported as far as body and face, etc., some are reported with dog-like muzzles, like what she saw. so I wouldn’t discount it being a sasquatch. the agility that she is reporting also sounds Sasquatch-like. they seem to be universally athletic, across all reports. even the big huge ones that people sometimes report are always very nimble and agile, like an athlete. so again, I think there is still a possibility it was a juvenile Sasquatch. but that being said, the picture she drew kind of looks like the creature that some people have reported as looking like a giant sloth. maybe it was one of those things, whatever they are.

    • Karla G

      The drawing looks like maybe a juvenile Sasquatch with a muzzle, which is often reported. But, aside from the agility aspect, it also looks like whatever the things are that people sometimes report as resembling a giant sloth.

  6. Shelly T

    Move into the woods with live stock everywhere and kill them for it, on their land. I live in the north-west and I can’t say I’m surprised when I see a wild animal and there’s no way I’d leave my live stock unattended.

  7. Michael C

    I hate hearing people say we don’t know what they are because we don’t have dna. Yes we do, Scott Carpenter spent his life figuring out what they are, helping people and collecting DNA. He collected multiple DNA samples from dogman. Just like sasquatch it always shows the mitochondrial being human female and the fathers side being (animal) Canine mixed with Unknown. Only difference in sasquatch is its chimps/ape mixed with Unknown. The gov will never acknowledge they exist, because it proves the Bible correct and accurate and that would destroy their future plans.

Leave a Reply