Jan 2

The Corpse of 1847

As famous as gorillas are today, there was a time in which they were no more tan a myth. Explorers would return from African jungles and tell stories about hairy, giant man-beasts of terrible strength and temper, with a nasty habit of abducting and raping women! Such stories were dismissed by scientists as nonsense, and as a result, the gorilla was unknown to science until quite recently. It is believed that the first gorilla report comes from Greek explorer Hanno, from the 5th century BC. Hanno traveled to the western coasts of Africa, possibly to Sierra Leona or even the gulf of Guinea, and reported “an island filled with savage people, most of them women, and covered on hair. Our interpreters call them gorillae”.

Maybe we should mention that not everyone is convinced about Hanno having encountered actual gorillas (his gorillae could have been chimpanzees). Much later, in 1625, British explorer Andrew Batell reported seeing a “monster” covered on hair except for the face and hands, which slept in trees and fed on fruit. According to him, this “monster” was most similar to a man, but “with the stature of a giant”. Gorillas remained obscure and poorly understood for many more years, being often thought of as brutish, unintelligent and extremely violent. It wasn’t until 1847 that a westerner (physician Thomas Savage) managed to obtain several gorilla bones, including a skull, while in Liberia, and published the very first formal description of the great ape. The next decade, explorer Paul du Chaillu became the first modern European to see a live gorilla during his expeditions to equatorial Africa. As for the mountain gorilla, a different, larger species, it was believed to be a myth until 1902!

 

 

Source: http://listverse.com/2010/04/16/10-beasts-that-used-to-be-mythical/

5 Responses to “The Corpse of 1847”

  1. Alexander F

    I am SO glad this was posted here. It’s very important that this community learns that gorillas were known to the world since prehistory, and simply weren’t officially scientifically documented until the 1850s.

    I have heard it far too many times that gorillas “weren’t proven to exist until the 1950s..” as evidence of Bigfoot possibly still being undocumented. Whether biggie is or isn’t out there, gorillas are not a feasible example.

    Awesome post!

  2. Stephanie G

    Oh, I loved this video posting. It was one of the best, clearest, most logical and detailed descriptions of WHY Bigfoot is not only a distinct possibility, but also how can it not be real? Too many credible sightings. Happy New Year to all and may 2017 never present a challenge in your life that you can’t overcome!

Leave a Reply