Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #167287
    Rob S
    Participant

    @wolf Good to see downunder represented here. Definitely saw the difference between the conundrums we were contemplating, i just drew on the relativity and couldve expressed that better.

    It so interesting as to why people who make accusation the react the way they do to either silence or defense. Ive never been able to understand it. Its as if they are so convinced in their point of view, regardless of evidence, that your damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

    #167284
    Rob S
    Participant

    Precisely. There is nothing here but speculation and now Steve is recanting the insinuated comments made in relation to Bob because his over the top book promotion has gone way too far and if he kept it up litigation would be a real possibility.

    #167281
    Rob S
    Participant

    I am happy to engage in open discussion my subject although it must not be tedious speculative dribble ? The what ifs of hypotheticals are not constructive. If I offended you with my remark regarding speculation making me drowsy, I sincerely apologise for being obtuse but I shan’t retract said statement.

    Signed
    Your majesty
    Bobby J

    #167278
    Rob S
    Participant

    @R P Id like to educate you but I feel it is too late and I lack the effort. Heres an easy one for you though. If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all. Extrapolated, if you have nothing constructive to add, observe, pay attention and be silent.

    .
    .
    .
    MOD NOTE
    As I just told RP, please see the pinned rules.

    #167277
    Rob S
    Participant

    I enjoy that you brought the psychology of the actions behind these events @Wolf. I thoroughly enjoy a discussion such as this and although id love Bigfoot to be a reality it matters not to me because I find the sociology of it so interesting.

    My opinion on a slightly different situation varies from yours and please entertain me. You have valid points but this thinking has perplexed me for sometime now. I am from Australia, I’ve often wondered if it is a cultural difference? If someone were to make an outrageous and false allegation against me id be very outspoken about the claims and vehemently defend myself. I’ve noticed online a lot, if an accused individual does this the default is to then say their denial is proof of guilt. To me this seems absurd? If someone defends themself they are guilty, if they ignore the comments the alternate reaction seems to be an attitude of “Yeh thats right, keeping their guilt silent”…

    Ive seen this behaviour in real world situations but it is prolific through out the Interwebs. Anyone wish to throw their hat in and make comment? I feel it is such an oxymoronic behaviour that is not only contradictory but entirely imbecile.

    Steve from how to hunt is within this number and I enjoy how he so passionately demonstrates his stupidity. Probably an excellent hunter eith vast knowledge but lacking consistent logical thought.

    #167269
    Rob S
    Participant

    Im sorry you’ve lost me. Adding speculation to speculation puts me to sleep.

    #167259
    Rob S
    Participant

    I kind of feel that is a redundent comment. If someones livelihood is affected by alleged statements, true or false, that in my opinion- which is not that of a law professional, would be reason enough for a law suit.

    An example continuing from the initial one mentioned. If someone alleged an individual was a pedophile, they lost their job working with children and the claims were never proven, nor in fact true, it doesn’t matter if they are inevitably exonerated. The damage is already done, loss of income as well as the affect on reputation etc may not be repairable. If we are debating semantics over definitions… You understand the connotation of using the word slander.

    #167249
    Rob S
    Participant

    Lets just clarify that no one stated or alleged Steve wrote the letter himself…

    #167246
    Rob S
    Participant

    All I see is an individual taking advantage of an old story, passive aggressively attacking a well known individual for the sake of promoting a book that is soon to be released.

    There is very little logic within the statements or the comments on the videos. Steve proclaims the guilty will speak out and also oh the guilty remain silent… This truth crusade is the biggest load of horse dung in the northern hemisphere, he is either a complete moron or a cunning influencer pulling marketing strings.

    #167236
    Rob S
    Participant

    If you watch the whole video it is insinuated that the individuals involved in the patty film, could be implicated in a murder and specifically John Green with the Gimlin name next to his.

    #167234
    Rob S
    Participant

    6min 25s

    #167233
    Rob S
    Participant

    https://youtu.be/sHIfsYGLRnQ time – 4min 58s

    #167205
    Rob S
    Participant

    Oh i agree completely, id just like to see this clown who is spouting absolutely unsubstantiated claims as fact explain it on a platform that is highly popular.

    Its not okay what Steve is doing, its complete slander and I feel that Wes would be the perfect man to set the record straight permanently.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)