Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Jan 16

I really do not see anything here

This video has been sent to me several times and I do not want to be rude but I just do not see anything here. I decided to post it to the blog, maybe I have poor eye sight but again….I do not see anything.

The YouTuber writes “Individuals claiming to have seen Bigfoot describe it as a large, hairy, muscular, bipedal ape-like creature, roughly 6 ft –9 ft tall, covered in hair described as black, dark brown, or dark reddish. Some descriptions include details such as large eyes, a pronounced brow ridge, and a large, low-set forehead. The top of the head has been described as rounded and crested, similar to the sagittal crest of the male gorilla, with a strong, unpleasant smell.”

27 Responses to “I really do not see anything here”

  6. Dave H

    Just a suggestion, try brightening your monitor/screen. There is certainly something that appears to look sort of like a gorilla face and conical head. However it does not move and it’s difficult to know if it is an animal or as suggested a knot on the tree. That chap in the video that suggested walking towards it, should have.

  7. Michael S

    This lady posted this on another bigfoot Facebook page and it doesn’t matter…some people will see whatever they want to see. UGH.
    And she has the gall to say that it’s the cutest thing she’s ever seen! lol

  8. Glen K

    Tough to say. Once again, the location is NOT given!!! Oh well, I’ll play guess that state. My chances are 1 in 50. Hmmmm…….I see trees,more trees, and more trees. And some leaves. Not a lot to go by. I’ll say Oregon.

  9. Chris B

    Videos like this is why the FB community gets mocked. It’s clearly a tree with a darkened knot. No movement to suggest a creature is there. And how about the person with the camera simply walk over there to get a better look? “Mystery” immediately solved! But no….if they were to do that, then they wouldn’t be able to post this video and generate clicks.

  12. Kathryn C

    On .25 slow speed I did see what appears to be a bf baby’s face inside the Y of the tree and I was able to confirm it because the mouth moved a few times. Also there appears to be a larger face directly to the left of the baby. These were things not apparent on the film at normal speed. If you look further right and up a little from the baby you can see another dark face peeking out between two trees. I do believe there may be three creatures total.

  17. Alexander F

    Amazing how many of these videos pervade the internet… Nope, there’s literally nothing of substance or intrigue there.

    I was just looking at this one (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9Mg0sVaaDM) which is supposed to be a still of a British biggie. If you look at it, you’ll see that it’s literally blank space–no joke, it’s negative space, with a snowy branch in the foreground and a tree behind, all coming together to kinda-sorta-maybe-a-tiny-bit “look” like BF.

    Very still. But, like I said on YouTube, pareidolia and biggie go together like creamy peanut butter and blackberry jam. They’re just meant to be!!

  18. William R

    I agree with Kathryn C. I was initially drawn to the left of the dark Y as I thought I saw a face. I believe this is just the knots on the tree. However, I can clearly see what appears to be a small juvenile Sasquatch in the dark Y of the tree. I also noticed its mouth and head move slightly several times. It definitely helps to run it at 1/4 speed. I could, of course, be wrong, but once I got away from the knots that I was initially drawn to and shifted my focus to the face to the right, I could clearly see “something”. Too bad the guy didn’t walk towards it. No way to know for sure. Great post though!

Leave a Reply