Nov 17

Hunter Finds Possible Bigfoot Tracks In Ohio With Photos

From the facebook page of the Ohio Bigfoot Conference:

“Possible juvenile tracks from Trumbull County, Ohio???? Found by a hunter in early Fall way off the beaten path…. There were some larger impressions off to the edge of this particular patch of exposed earth but in the weeds (notice the partial heel in front on the top side of the 2nd photo). Probably human but you never know…”

 

ohio1 ohio2

 

Credit:http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com

13 Responses to “Hunter Finds Possible Bigfoot Tracks In Ohio With Photos”

  1. David R

    When it comes to small bigfoot tracks it’s hard to tell. I saw one smaller that was way out on an old dug out logging road that you couldn’t drive to. It was in Grays Harbor WA back in 1980, and I know that no kid made that in the fall!

    • Christopher c

      Bottom line is they were found way off the beaten path,they are flatfooted in nature which narrows it down greatly since the majority of humans are not flatfooted unless they are wild indigenous, so It looks to me that these are genuine it’s too bad they did not cast these as the substrate so favorable that dermals could very well be present upon closer examination because to the clay like consistency of the mud.

  2. Jerry W

    If you look in the middle you can see what looks like an upside down V towards the middle where you might have a mid tarsal break, I think this is a print of one of those feet running shoes, they are made with zero lift. If you google something like ‘feet sneakers’ and look at images there are several that look similar. IMHO.

  3. Ted G

    If there is other evidence anywhere around the print that would help to lend credit to it being either human or sasquatch. How dicernable are the other tracks. Are there scat piles anywhere near? Any nesting/blind sites? You have to look at the evidence as a while like a crime scene.

Leave a Reply