Mattsquatch Presents says “Different types of Sasquatch? Since i have talked about it on my youtube channel, I figured I would be a good question to ask. I asked Dr. Meldrum about what he thought about the different types of Bigfoot being seen in North America. It was interesting to say the least. Thank you for watching.”
Sasquatch Chronicles Blog
7 Responses to “Dr. Jeff Meldrum on the different types of bigfoot”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Bonnie I
Meldrum mainly studies the footprints and from that information he believes they are animals of just one species. I wonder what his explanation might be on the footprints where the big toe is shorter than the 2nd toe as I have noticed in at least a few of the photographs. In humanoids this is known as Grecian or Morton’s toe and I have read that it is most common amongst people of Scandinavian descent. Sort of interesting too –
F S
I’m so over the footprint “evidence”.
Show me a body.
James C
It’s quite possible they are all the same species. Different breeding populations can show different physical characteristics. I mean a poodle and a great Dane are both the same species. Humans vary too.
F S
Lost all respect for him when he lied about and trashed Dr. Melba Ketchum, who is an actual MD when he is just a PhD.
Celia
Actually, Dr. Ketchum isn’t an MD…she’s a DVM. And they don’t just hand out PhDs. Those doctoral programs are quite rigorous – especially in the anatomical sciences. I’m also a biologist and I read the Ketchum paper. I wish I could find her work credible but there are too many holes in both the methodology and results for her conclusions to hold any water. Hopefully, someone can pull it off someday, but her attempt fell flat.
Augustine L
I don’t think we have the kind of information that will let us determine ONE species, let alone parse the into more.
Celia
Actually, Dr. Ketchum isn’t an MD…she’s a DVM. And they don’t just hand out PhDs. Those doctoral programs are quite rigorous – especially in the anatomical sciences. I’m also a biologist and I read the Ketchum paper. I wish I could find her work credible but there are too many holes in both the methodology and results for her conclusions to hold any water. Hopefully, someone can pull it off someday, but her attempt fell flat.