Sep 9

College Paper From A Listener: Sasquatch Proposal

A listener of mine named Miguel wrote this paper for college. I thought he did a great job, check it out:

I am witting my proposal on why the government should recognize Bigfoot/Sasquatch as real animals that live in the forest and also tell the truth about where they actually come from. Most people do not believe that these things exist but I have strong evidence that I am going to present and also propose why the government should recognize them as living animals and protect them.

We first start out with Darwinism. The simple view of it is that we are taught in school that everything evolves and everything out there was once eat survive reproduce and finally we come along we stand there and are able to think, what’s it all about? Why are we as humans so different from anything on this planet? Darwinism says that we evolved from apes into what we are today. This is mostly everyone’s interpretation of life on earth and what the government wants us to believe. I am now going to begin to present an alternative view for you to consider.

Something that most people do not know about is the Miocene Era. The Miocene era lasted from 25 million years ago to around 5 million years ago. Now you all would think that monkeys came first, they did, at about 35 million years ago monkeys begin to appear in the fossil record. They are almost immediately eclipsed when the Miocene apes begin to appear. Miocene apes were tailless apes like gorillas and chimps not monkeys. These apes were all over the place during this era and for about 20 million years dominated monkeys. Monkeys have taken over in the last 8 to 10 million years in the fossil record. The Miocene era shows us that there were 50 to 100 species of ape. We have two chimps today and two gorillas today.

There were numbers of each different species of ape during the Miocene and they were dwarf size, human size, and even bigger than humans and Giganthopithicus was one of those bigger species. Even though we found fossils in the early Miocene and not as many in the late part of the era that doesn’t mean they aren’t there. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence just because you don’t find fossils doesn’t mean that they aren’t there. You have to be killed in a very specific way to create a fossil. For example, let’s say you are killed at the waterhole and are left on the soil. After some time a herd of wildebeest come and stomp you into the ground so that scavengers and bugs can’t get into your body and you eventually become a fossil. This is why there are so little fossils of these apes and it has to do with where you live and what your environment is like at that particular time. On top of that these apes are living in forests where it is extremely difficult to make fossils. It’s rare to get fossils although we have a lot of them and there are periods where we have lots of them. It makes sense to me that those Miocene apes have gone on from the beginning 25 million years ago right on through and they didn’t necessarily go extinct. They didn’t necessarily go extinct but they tell you that they all did except for the 7 that we have now: the two types of chimps, the two types of gorillas, orangutans, gibbons, etc. Why would all those apes go extinct? There was no catastrophic extinction event like what took out the dinosaurs so why would they go extinct. They’re living for the most part in forests not out on the savannah. If you aren’t running 40mph you are a snack treat for the cats out there that’s why they are living in forests and in trees so they can scamper up or get away and hide from the cats. I’m not saying there aren’t any cats in the forests and jungles, there just aren’t as many compared to the savannahs. When they are living their lives their environment isn’t disappearing beneath them at all. When you have periods of change in the environment it changes very slowly and if you have survival instincts like animals do, you will just move where the environment goes. This is exactly what the monkeys did and it didn’t hurt them so why would it hurt the other species of ape and take them all out?

The problem with the Miocene is that it produced a number of short armed apes. It also produced a number of long armed apes but mostly a number of short armed apes. Short armed apes have arms that are more like monkeys than the quadrupedal apes that we know today. They are a problem because you have to explain how they moved around. It isn’t easy to move on all fours if you have arms equal in length to your legs. We as humans have arms that are shorter than our legs and the apes we have today all have arms longer than their legs in order to move comfortably. What science says about the short arm apes is that they would travel in trees like monkeys but monkeys have tails for balance, the short armed apes had no tails. Take away a tail and moving around in trees gets pretty hard. Get up over 200 pounds with no tail and that gets extremely hard. Yet, they insisted it happened this way because they cannot allow bipedal locomotion in the Miocene because it leads straight to Sasquatch. So they leave out the possibility of bipedal walking in the entirety of the Miocene when it screams out that it most likely was there because of the short armed apes. The Darwinist solution for how the short armed apes moved on the ground is that they walked with their knuckles dragging on the ground. Ask yourself, if you have been walking with your knuckles dragging on the ground for millions of years don’t you think one us would think to raise up a bit higher, walk upright and become bipedal? Yes, because I don’t think knuckle dragging is the answer but they, the other side all buy that and I think it’s ridiculous frankly.

We know from the bones that we recovered like from Lucy and the Lake Turkana boy that we have four types of australopithecines: Africanis, Afarensis, Robustus, and Boisei. A pair of upright walking chimps and a pair of upright walking gorillas at four million years ago down to two million years ago including the sagittal crest. The most famous of the australopithecines is Lucy. Her bones were discovered in 1974 and carbon dating showed that her bones were 3.2 million years old. We have 40% of her skeleton, mirror imaging gives us about 80% but there is enough to clearly see that there is no doubt she’s a bipedal creature because we have the bones to prove it. What science does to deceive you is that they make her look as human as possible. They only thing human about her is that she walks upright but they do things like bump her shoulders up so that it looks like her arms are shorter than what they actually are in proportion to her legs. Vince Lombardi said football is a game of inches, so is anthropology. That now brings us into the early Homos: Homo habilis, Erectus, Neanderthal etc. Science tells us that anything that walks upright and came before us is considered a pre human and that’s what we evolved from. Looking at the Lake Turkana boy a Homo erectus his bones were found in 1984. Carbon dating showed that the bones were 1.5 million years old and he was about 12 years old when he died. Even though he was 12 years old he stood already 6 feet tall and would probably grow to 6’7 to 6’8 in adulthood we still aren’t sure how they grew but we have a pretty good idea. The thing with him is that at 12 years old every bone in his body was thicker and more robust than every bone in Arnold Schwarzenegger’s body in his prime. Yes the early australopithecines and the early homos walk upright we know that but they don’t look very human. When science shows us a picture of a Neanderthal or Homo erectus, as a part of the deception we are given an ugly face sitting on a very human looking body. Science can’t argue what the faces looked like because we have the skulls. We don’t have a whole lot of the body bones but even though have enough of the bones to know better like with Lucy they still give the pre humans the nice slender human bodies to make you believe that science has it under control and that Darwinism is still intact. Also for the longest time Neanderthal’s were the last step and that we evolved from them and I say it’s impossible. Neanderthals have a totally different anatomy than us and the structure of their bones compared to ours is like comparing broomsticks to shovel handles. We know that they were so much more robust than us because your bone density is a function of the torque that your muscles can generate. Also on top of that if we evolved from Neanderthals we lost two chromosomes, lost a whole bunch of strength and durability, and our brains shrunk but somehow we turned out a whole lot smarter, it’s interesting isn’t it.

In my eyes the so called pre humans are non-extinct Miocene apes. They share no basic characteristics with us humans. Apart from them being bipedal they did not walk the way we do. We have unique sets of pre human footprints from Tanzania, Africa discovered back in 1978. These tracks are 3.5 million years old and they aren’t human because the way they place their foot on the ground. A typical human foot has an arch and we swing our momentum around our arch with a hard heel strike and push off of our big toe, that’s why our joints wear out over time. The tracks found in Africa in 1978 it was clear that whatever creatures made the tracks were landing flat on the ground not on the heel and didn’t have to swing its momentum around its foot it just picked it up and kept moving efficiently because they’re walking right. At 3.5 million years ago the early australopithecines are walking better than we are today. We have the skulls because we know the transitions that they’ve made over time to adapt to the planet. They needed improvement in the skulls, but I don’t think they needed much improvement in the feet. I believe they got walking correct after millions of years of perfecting it. Also it’s clear to see that the walking of the australopithecines and the early Homos have the same motion and placement of the tracks we have today of reported Sasquatch sightings.

It would probably amaze you to know that according to the fossil record the early Homos and us humans lived on the planet side by side for at least 100,000 years. We are a pack animal we are two legged hyenas. Science says that we drove the other apes to extinction but I don’t buy it. What if we didn’t drive them to extinction but we just drove them to places where we stop chasing them and to places where they don’t make fossils. If this scenario is true which I postulate that it is given all the evidence, then it would explain the hundreds and thousands of sightings of upright walking hair covered creatures living in the deep forests, jungles, and high mountain ranges that we have today. There are four types of hominoids. We have the bigfoot/sasquatch kind that live in North America (7 to 10 feet tall, 500 to 1,000 pounds), The Yeti that lives exclusively in the Himalayan mountains (6 to 9 feet tall, 300 to 600 pounds), the Almas that live in southern Russia and the north Indonesian mountains (5 to 7 feet tall, 200 to 500 pounds), and the Ogaugweys that live in the jungles of south America and Australia (4 to 6 feet tall, 200 to 400 pounds). It’s also very interesting that there were 4 types of australopithecines, 4 types of early Homos, and what a surprise there are 4 types of hominoids.

With all of this being said and all the evidence provided these things are indeed real and I have seen two of them myself. They have been reported long before Europeans stepped foot on North America and are still being reported today on every continent except Antarctica. When these things are reported they are consistent. Most of them have a sagittal crest, extremely tall, very hairy, big robust bodies, arms that hang down to their knees, low sloping foreheads, an ugly face with barely a neck. Take away the hair and I just described to you the early australopithecines and the early homos. The pre humans are today’s hominoids. The government cannot come out and tell you this truth because it would conflict with laziness of what science has deceived us with for so many years and we would have to go back and really take a look at evolution. With the evidence and information that I have provided to prove these things exist I believe the government should really considered what I am proposing and come out publicly and freely instead of covering up the existence of these things.

15 Responses to “College Paper From A Listener: Sasquatch Proposal”

  1. Steven B

    “…what science has deceived us with for so many years and we would have to go back and really take a look at evolution. ”

    I agree. What would happen if their existence throws a big ole “monkey wrench” 😉 into the gears of evolutionary theory?

    I don’t believe for a minute that there is a cover-up due to what it would do to the religious (generally, goobermints don’t give a rip and, if they had their way, “religion” would go extinct). I theorize that, perhaps, the actual existence of these creatures (and others) might just turn evolutionary theory on its head and the ramifications of THAT would be staggering on so many levels.

  2. Ed A

    I hope this thing hasn’t been presented yet.
    It needs serious editing. Nice first draft. No footnotes, and the constant use of the first person need to be addressed.

  3. Larry F

    While I agree with your premise the fact that Darwin abandoned his own work shortly before his death. He found that his assistant Hackel or Hackleman had falsified findings. He could not reproduce the same outcome when he later attempted to do so. The illustrations falsified left him bitter and discouraged. He admitted before his death that phylogeny recapitulated philogeny and ontogeny recaputulated ontogeny. In short nature changes only within kind. Ie a cow and a bull will not produce a horse or a dog will not have a cat or a monkey. The pattern that God created worked and therefore it was used repeatedly to produce separate but different creatures. Science by definition has to be able to repeat the same event and get the same results. Darwin found too late that his work had been falsified. That has not stopped those who choose to believe a lie from latching on and promulgating this. Thinking themselves to be wise they became fools

  4. Larry F

    While I agree with your premise the fact that Darwin abandoned his own work shortly before his death. He found that his assistant Hackel had falsified findings. He could not reproduce the same outcome when he later attempted to do so. The illustrations falsified left him bitter and discouraged. He admitted before his death that phylogeny recapitulated philogeny and ontogeny recaputulated ontogeny. In short nature changes only within kind. Ie a cow and a bull will not produce a horse or a dog will not have a cat or a monkey. The pattern that God created worked and therefore it was used repeatedly to produce separate but different creatures. Science by definition has to be able to repeat the same event and get the same results. Darwin found too late that his work had been falsified. That has not stopped those who choose to believe a lie from latching on and promulgating this. Thinking themselves to be wise they became fools

  5. Larry F

    It is a shadow government that is in control of this topic. Over 100 billion of defense spending is unaccounted for and those in the shadows who work to keep it quiet are not concerned with the reason or right or wrong. The pockets are deep and they perform their duty without oversight or conscience. A seared conscience is not to be dealt with. Those who have killed the creature have been silenced. Life is too short to worry that with a flip of the switch you bank account is gone and your retirement disappears. Your employment is ended. Let it go. Their a agents at every major media to quash it. Whether it is because logging would be shutdown or lawsuits pertaining to missing in federal forests or because it would prove Genesis 6 about all flesh being defiled or aliens contact If people knew what was out there it would cost a lot of revenue from campers hunters and fishers in the remote locales. Not worth pursuing. Your life is too precious and valued to risk everything. Got IRS behind me and I will just enjoy the story of encounters

  6. Neville L

    I believe they’ve been here way too long for that to matter. The oral history of indigenous peoples talk of it and those that usually don’t have cultural and spiritual reasons not to: they respect them and what they are capable of.
    Our “Government”, whoever whatever entity, is very interested in them for their brute strength, intact intuition, intelligence and biology physiologically. I am sure they are manipulating them somehow. No human has the abilities they have.

    I don’t remember which blog or who, but do remember one where some reservists were called to a secret incident via helo into the Alleghenies which included the perverbial secret agents (2) who drove up in a white van, of which one had an outdated tracking device used in forest biology work. The guy on the blog and his best buddy were not told what was going on but they followed orders from their head officer. It was at night. It turned out they were after a female BF which had an old style welded ankle band on and is why they had the tracking device: they had tracked her in this area and the blogger said there was something said about her “going rogue”. Well they couldn’t find her at first but found one that they were ordered to kill, finding out after it was blasted to death it was a male. They trapped it up against a cliff of sorts. Well, immediately after it went down, the female rushed everyone from behind the troops. It happened so fast, and it caught the blogger’s friend as it attempted to pass between the two who stayed close. They were already terrorized. It caught his buddy by one arm, slung him to the left full force into a large tree then in the same motion then slung him to the right, throwing him some ridiculous amount of feet to the ground. He never fully recovered from that and died early in life.
    The female was enraged and then took off…I don’t think they got her but don’t remember. But this guy said everyone looked at the dead male and it was described. The gov agents had it put into a sling and the helicopter took it away.
    Does anyone remember this incident?
    My point is, someone is doing something with these creatures and I don’t think it is benign or innocent. If they wanted to get rid of all the BF’s they could do it, but they don’t, like the ones on military bases that have cart-blanche to go where they wish inside those desert base tunnels. Etc., etc. . I agree the paper needs work: there are holes that can be patched up.

Leave a Reply