John Bindernagel explaining the types of evidence and how evidence can ultimately provide the conclusion of existence.

John Bindernagel explaining the types of evidence and how evidence can ultimately provide the conclusion of existence.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Kay S
Mr Bindernagel makes some excellent points. This is well worth watching. Thank you.
Duke S
Good stuff!
m99
Great presentation. What really gets me in all of this is the documentation of the first nations and native people. Sitting Bull once said, If you can find one honest man in Washington, I want to talk to him. The natives were not in the habit of lying, and even to this day there are pHd’s in oral tradition. That means the story handed down must be correct, not embellished to be a myth only. Everything was stripped from these first nations, why must we accuse them also of being liars. And the eye witness account have to mean something. That’s why I’m so fascinated with this site. Account after account amazes me. As far as the govt? it simply a question of status quo.
Robert P
M99 money is everything to the people in Washington. Example. The school systems get worse and worse and the answer is always more money.
m99
~yes Robert, you nailed it. But, isn’t it so sad?
PATRICK
Kick butt.I love logic.thx.
Greg T
I’m torn by the two ideas that we either must strive to convince ‘science’ to review and accept evidence, or just know/believe that sasquatch exists. Bindernagel’s points are spot on, however, they remind me a bit of the kid that constantly reminds the teacher late on a Friday afternoon that the class was supposed to take a test. When the teacher finally acknowledges the test, no one is happy with the outcome. On the one hand, I have always liked the topic and once I found this site, have listened to every new and old episode over a 6 month period (not to mention all of the other shows and sources that I have been introduced to from this site – thanks Wes). So, if everyone decided that it would be best that ‘science’ didn’t have to accept this, so stopped sharing, we would lose all of this fascinating material to read, watch, listen to, and share. On the other hand, the constant desire of some, maybe such as Bindernagel, Meldrum, etc. (and I’m making the assumption that they feel this way), to prove or force their scientific colleagues to accept this evidence by getting a body past the MIB evidence destroyers (aka government acceptance or acknowledgment), then we may all of a sudden be like the rest of the class that doesn’t want to take the Friday test when the teacher appeases the one student. Maybe there’s a balance where those that know and believe won’t lose the wild places on this earth at some point when ‘science’ decides that sasquatch is real.
Chris A
Because science would have to admit that their world view and theories are wrong.
Linda G
There is a real arrogance among many scientists… i see and hear this in my family, my mathematician briother, my brother in law who is an astrophysicist at JET propulsion lab, my father in law who was an engineer at NASA for 35+ years. Their mindsets are like set in concrete, not open minded. Just my opinion.