Dec 26

Why are there no Sasquatch Bodies or Bones?

By Daniel Dover

One of the most common objections for the existence of bigfoot/sasquatch is why has no one ever found their remains? It’s not only an argument advanced by the average skeptic, but the scientific community will never recognize them without a type species as well. There are a number of reasons often fielded for the lack of physical remains:

Photos of two alleged dead sasquatches lying in the snow, both shot and killed, the first (left) killed in the 1940′s, the second (right) killed in the late 1800′s

10 REASONS USED FOR LACK OF PHYSICAL REMAINS

1. People rarely ever find the remains of large wild animals.
2. They avoid people thus perish in secluded areas and decompose before ever seen.
3. Remains can be reduced to bone in a week.
4. Bones are scattered and gnawed on by animals and covered by forest debris.
5. Bones seldom fossilize in acidic forest soils, but also decay.
6. Many forest animals and insects love a free meal.
7. No one searches for their remains.
8. Government cover-up/conspiracies.
9. Bones have been found but are invariably misidentified as human.
10. Sasquatches carry away and bury their dead.

This research will mainly focus on the last three of those possible reasons. First we’ll look at the misidentification of bones and sasquatches carrying off their dead and buying them. There have been a number of reports of sasquatches burying their dead, which if true would be a great impediment to ever finding their remains.

Sasquatches Seen Burying Their Dead

Sasquatch burials compiled by Ray Crowe

“Date unknown, modern era: Pacific Northwest. A man witnessed three Bigfoots digging a hole with their hands to bury a fourth Bigfoot. Afterward, they rolled rocks on the grave. Reported by Roger Patterson. Date unknown, modern era: Northern California. A witness saw four Bigfoots carrying bones. The longest bone was up to four feet long. Reported by Ray Crowe. 1962-1967: Northern Washington state. A man witnessed three Bigfoots burying a fourth one. Reported by Peter Byrne. Before 1975: Location unknown, probably Pacific Northwest. Three Bigfoots were witnessed digging a hole with their hands to bury a fourth Bigfoot. When the hole was filled in, huge boulders were rolled over the site. Reported by Glen Thomas. Summer 1992: Estacada, Oregon, near Bagby Hot Springs. A philosophy teacher saw two Bigfoots, either a male and female or two females. There were two young, auburn colored Bigfoots with them. They were in a riverbed, burying another Bigfoot under a pile of stones. They had not dug a hole; they were just burying it with rocks. He stated that the Bigfoots were acting “sad.” The site was rechecked by an investigator one year later, but flooding had washed the stones away, and the site could not be rediscovered. Reported by Ray Crowe. We see over and over here reports of 3-4 Bigfoots participating in the burial of another, as if it is some kind of a ceremony.”

2010 A Man witnessed a possible burial ritual of an infant in a hollow tree stump decorated with four gray squirrel tails suspended from the top edge of the stump. Four sasquatches were swaying from side to side while making grunting sounds. But it appears they discovered the witness and dispersed, and the witness got out of there too. When the witness came back the next day all he found in the stump was a little dark hair, blood, and a large piece of old deer hide.

April 6, 2014. There was a video of a U.S. park ranger describing a bigfoot burial that he witnessed, but it seems that at all the sites where the video was posted is now labeled private and is no longer available. The caption with the video read as follows, “This report comes from the High Sierra in California. A forest ranger witnesses a “Bigfoot burial” after a camp was ransacked by a clan of Bigfoots.” Maybe the Parks Service didn’t like him being on video and that is why it is no longer available. This also gets into the realm of government cover-up that some people will scoff at as inconceivable.

Reports of Sasquatches carrying away their dead

A problem with sasquatch remains is they are so heavy that when people kill them or find their bodies they cannot move the body. When they go to get means to haul it away or bring authorities back to it, it invariably is gone by the time they get back, apparently carried away by other sasquatches.

Reports compiled by Ray Crowe

“Unknown date, modern era: Near Roseburg, Oregon. A hunter found a dead Bigfoot by a stream. He poked it and got no response. He tried to carry it out with the help of his hunting companions, but it was too heavy at 700-900 pounds. They went back to town to get a truck to cart it out with, but when they came back, it was gone. They found the footprints of another Bigfoot, which had apparently carried it away. Reported by Ray Crowe.

Unknown date, modern era: Yankton, Oregon. Near the Colombia River north of Portland, a hunter shot a Bigfoot four times between the eyes and killed it. It rolled off the road. The man came back 24 hours later, and the body was gone. There was a set of three tracks, possibly a family group – a male, a female and a juvenile. Reported by Ray Crowe.

After 1960: Pendicton, British Colombia. In south-central British Colombia, two fishermen found a dead Bigfoot along the trail. They first smelled the corpse, then found the body. Upon investigating, they heard sounds in the brush. Fearing it was another Bigfoot, they quickly left the scene. They went back with wildlife officials 10 days later and there was only a dark spot on the trail. Had a bear eaten it? Had other Bigfoots hauled it off? Reported by Peter Byrne.

1960’s: Douglas, Oregon: In the Cascades west of the Umpqua National Forest, a farmer shot a Bigfoot and then somehow managed to take it back to his house, where he left it outside. Other Bigfoots then came that night and retrieved the body. Reported in the Bigfoot Track Record.

1965: Kitimat, British Colombia. On the coast of central British Colombia, a Kitimat man shot and killed a Bigfoot near town. He was trying to drag the body away when other Bigfoots came out and tried to attack him. He barely escaped to his canoe. Reported on the British Colombia Scientific Cryptozoology Club website.

January 2000: Honobia, Oklahoma. The Siege of Honobia. Bigfoot apparently shot and killed as part of a group that was raiding and harassing a rural residence. Other Bigfoots charged in after it was killed with three shots, one to the head, with one throwing the dead bigfoot on it’s shoulder and running back into the woods with it. Reported by the BFRO. Sasquatch carried body Sasquatch Chronicles ep. 11, Siege at Honobia

Fall 1941: Near Basket Lake, Manitoba. A 17 year old boy hunting out of season shot and killed a Bigfoot that he thought was a moose. He left it in the forest because he thought it was human and because he was hunting out of season. He went back sometime later and the body was gone. Reported on the BFRO site. Missing body

In the late 1800’s a sasquatch was hit and killed by a train at night. The men on the train loaded the body on a flat car, taking a lot of men to load it due to it being so heavy. While they were busy working on the cattle catcher damaged during the collision the body was stolen off the flat car. Train kills sasquatch

It therefore seems obvious that sasquatches take charge of the remains of their dead family members. This act makes it difficult for anyone to ever find a sasquatch that has died of natural or other causes.

Sasquatch bones found and misidentified as human

original-skull-from-humboldt-sink

Alleged sasquatch skull from humboldt-sink (Lovelock Skull)

Note the above comparison of a sasquatch head to an extremely large skull found near Lovelock, Nevada. The protruding jaw, brow ridge, sloping forehead, vaulted cranium, and the well developed nuchel crest for the attachment of very large neck muscles (lending sasquatches the “no neck” appearance) are all typical characteristics of sasquatches. Modern human skulls do not have these features, yet anthropologists who know of no other hominids to ascribe it to declare it must be human.

There are many instances of extremely large skeletal finds with unusual skulls that don’t fit the features of modern man but are nevertheless identified as human and then forgotten, crated-up, and lost somewhere in storage at museums and universities, never to be seen again, but we still have all these newspaper accounts describing these incredible finds.

“First reported in the 4 May 1912 issue of the New York Times, the 18 skeletons found by the Peterson brothers on Lake Lawn Farm in southwest Wisconsin exhibited several strange and freakish features. Their heights ranged between seven and nine feet and their skulls “presumably those of men, are much larger than the heads of any race which inhabit America to-day.” Above the eye sockets, “the head slopes straight back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars.”

Read the full article

15 Responses to “Why are there no Sasquatch Bodies or Bones?”

  1. MyKill L

    Wes what’s the deal bud. I am a member and still it is saying error when I try to listen to “member” content!? I really need help and have already emailed. I was charged on the 20th of Dec so I know I’m paid up. I really need that content my friend. Will lose it without it!! Lol

  2. joel v

    ALL IS NOT WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE IN THIS WORLD. ESPECIALLY IN THE FORESTS WHERE THERE ARE STILL GIANTS ROAMING THE MOUNTAINS AND FORESTS. BEST BOO KRECOMENDATION ARE THE MISSING 411 BOOKS BY DAVID PAULIDES. BEST BOOK I READ ALL YEAR WAS THE ANCIENT GIANTS WHO ONCE RULED AMERICA BY RICHARD DEWHURST. A WHOLE PERIOD OF HISTORY THAT WAS INTENTIONALLY COVERED UP AND IS NOT EVEN BROUGHT UP ANYWHERE IN WESTERN CULTURE. THE SUBTITLE OF THAT BOOK IS TITLED THE MISSING SKELETONS AND THE GREAT SMITHSONIAN COVERUP. A COVER UP INDEED BY THE CRIMINALS THAT ARE RUNNING THE FICTIONAL SHOW THEY CALL REALITY!!

    ALSO THERE HAVE BEEN MANY MANY REPORTS OF WITNESSES SEEING THESE CREATURES BURY THERE DEAD!! THE BOOK LOCALS BY THOM POWELL HAS A GREAT STORY OF SUCH HAPPENINGS!!

    ONE MUST CAST ALL DOUBT ASIDE WHEN BECOMING IMMERSED IN THE MYSTERY. ALL DOUBT!!

  3. joel v

    #1 BOOK RECOMENDATION!!

    A MUST BUY AND A MUST READ!! LIKE THE MISSING 411 BOOKS YOU WONT BE ABLE TO PUT THIS ONE DOWN!!

    THE ANCIENT GIANTS WHO ONCE RULED AMERICA THE MISSING SKELTONS AND THE GREAT SMITHSONIAN COVER UP!! BY RICHARD DEWHURST

    BEST BOOK IVE READ ALL YEAR BESIDES THE ONE THAT UNFOLDS WEEKLY ON SASQUATCH CHRONICLES!!!

  4. steve m

    While deer hunting this year I found a doe lying dead 20 yds from a tree stand that I had hunted from just three days prior. She was not there 3 days earlier so I know that it was a recent death I checked her out to try and find cause of death. I found no signs of arrow or gum shot wounds. Natural causes probably. Anyway I decided to hunt other spots for a couple weeks. When I returned 2 weeks later to hunt that spot. I found only a little amount of fur and if I wouldn’t have seen her 2 weeks prior I wouldn’t have known that she had ever been there. My point is nature cleans up after itself. So I do believe that anything, even a sasquatch body could completely disappear quickly without ever being found

  5. Tyler D

    There’s a chemical in the soil of the woods that speeds up the decomposition process exponentially. Not to mention the scavengers that pick the carcass clean and in the process will scatter the bones. Very few people run across the dead body of a bear or a mountain lion, but does that mean they don’t exist? Absolutely not. And there’s also a theory that when an animal feels that the end of their life is nearing closer they will go somewhere comfortable where they believe nothing will find or get to them. These animals are also known to move in groups and from the encounters we’ve heard are very protective of one another. Including how vast and thick these forests are, the chances of stumbling upon one of their bodies is seriously decreased

  6. Knobby

    If you read the full article it gives examples of them carrying away and burying their dead. Myself, I doubt they eat close relatives. I believe they might at times kill and eat a non-relative though.

  7. michael n

    Well, if someone had the chance and the gear after they shot one they could insert a GPS device under the skin and sew it back up or wait for others to show up and shoot them too. Too much?? Nah, didn’t think so…lol The problem would be getting into an area without them knowing which I think would be damn near impossible. But I think the GPS thing might work if you had quite a few people to watch your back,front,and sides. If you could afford one a Barrett 50 cal would be ideal to take one down with one shot and you wouldn’t have to be close and in danger to do so. So someone re-morygage your house and buy one and I will go with you to collect a specimen???? . I’m a jerk, I know….lol

    • michael n

      Remortgage… This site seems to spell check for me. Does anyone else have that problem? I’ve noticed when I post it does strange things to me and the words I type…..infrasound? Maybe…..I feel strange right now. Could be the beer but eye dout itt…….

Leave a Reply