Nov 16

Top 5 pieces of compelling bigfoot evidence. Do you agree?

 

This particular YouTube channel reached the conclusion that these are the top 5 pieces of compelling bigfoot evidence. Do you agree?

Bigfoot also known as Sasquatch is the ape like creature believed to inhabit all areas of the world but most commonly the Pacific Northwest region of North America. It is described as an enormous, creature with dark brown or reddish brown hair and although it has not been proven to exist, million of people around the world believe that they do roam the woods with thousands of people having first hand experience with the beast. So here are five of the strongest pieces of evidence to prove the existence of Bigfoot.

16 Responses to “Top 5 pieces of compelling bigfoot evidence. Do you agree?”

  1. Gabriel H

    Number 1.1 : Following a harrowing nighttime encounter with what they believe to have been multiple Bigfoot back in November of 2012, brothers Wes & Woody Germer started a podcast where witnesses could also share their own Bigfoot encounters. Now known as Sasquatch Chronicles, the podcast has become an overwhelming success, with witnesses coming forth from every walk of life you can think of, to present similar stories of run-ins with the legendary beast. Due to the immense response of witnesses coming forward with their encounter stories, Sasquatch Chronicles is now considered one of the top resources for Bigfoot researchers and enthusiasts alike; making this podcast one of the largest sources of testimonial evidence to date.

    ~Gabe~

  2. SantiamLady

    Is it true Bob Gimlin said “in his later years” that he thought it was possible Patterson staged an elaborate hoax that fooled even him??? I’ve never heard him say anything like that! What the…..!!!

  3. Kim L

    My personal opinion,
    The PG footage is far beyond reproach
    The Skookum cast is real
    The dermal ridged casts, as a group, are definitive
    Then, the detailed , first hand descriptions, provided by so many, with no reason to lie, too experienced to “mis-identify”, and just ringing of truth, provide all I need to say, – BF is real, I really don’t care if you don’t think so, but, I’m sorry you feel that way, as- you’re missing all the fun!

    • SantiamLady

      Oh Kim!
      I totally agree and believe, just like you do. I’m just confused by the statement in that footage claiming that Gimlin said that it was possible HE was hoaxed by Patterson, that it was all staged without him knowing it. ???? I don’t believe Gimlin ever said that, At least I never heard him say that. Where did the guy narrating this clip get his info?
      Does anyone know?

    • Tyler D

      If he said anything like that, it was more than likely when they had first encountered Patty and that was possibly his mind trying to make sense of what he was seeing. Because out of the two Roger Patterson was the sasquatch fanatic and I believe Bob was more along the lines of thinking there could possibly be something to it but he wasn’t quite sold on it. I think the possibility of being dooped would probably cross my mind as well, especially that day in age. So if he did say that, which I’m not saying that he did, this video more than likely took it out of context

  4. Paul M

    This real or not deal been going on far to long. That’s real film. And so many others say that they have had same type reaction when coming up on the beasts. I’m not gonna use profanity on these unbeliers. but they can go ×××× themselves and stay under there blankees. Have a nice day UALL.

  5. Tyler D

    I do agree that these are very strong pieces of evidence of the existence of sasquatch. And when you actually get down to it, this video is only scratching the surface of all the proof that is out there. And I never understood the controversy around Paul Freeman. I think that the Freeman footage among the rest of the video evidence that Paul Freeman collected to be genuine. Lord only knows how much more phenomenal clear photographs and video evidence is out there that people don’t want to bring forward out of fear of social and public ridicule. It’s a real shame that this is the case but I think in the near future when this topic is made more public we’ll start seeing a flurry of evidence coming in. And I think that there’s a strong chance that a decent portion of it will be coming into Wes

Leave a Reply