Forum Replies Created
September 11, 2019 at 6:34 pm #156507
Knobby: The answer to your question (where did the skull capacity measurements come from?) is in the video (6:20). Brian is not in the video. I do not see the relevance of that picture. It is not in the video either.
I do not understand what you are trying to do here. It seams like you are just belittling Paul and I. You have taken what I have written out of context several times. I get we have different opinions and that is all it is opinion.
My whole point bringing this up is Melba is not alone with unknown DNA results that have gotten scoffed at without proper investigation to do so. You can believe what you want it doesn’t mean I am going to harass you about it.September 11, 2019 at 12:36 pm #156475
Paul/Knobby: This subject has enough anomalies to warrant a scientific investigation. The scientians are not going to do it. We are left with those that will, much like the Sasquatch topic(fringe topics). The skulls need to be organized so it is obvious which skull is being looked at by whom. Without more research and organization it comes down to what is my/your opinion.September 10, 2019 at 1:42 pm #156425
Knobby: checkSeptember 10, 2019 at 11:39 am #156422September 9, 2019 at 7:38 pm #156390
Knobby: We have different opinions and that’s OK. We do not know what skull was looked at by whom exactly my point. Yes more DNA tests should be done, but thee scoffers you are referring to are not going to do it. You see they have an opinion that there is nothing to see here without even looking. It is the same ploy they take with the Sasquatch topic. They have the perfect system they decide what is dictated and the rest of us are controlled by fear and division. We have to do the science because the scientians (scientism) are not going to. If they do they lose their funding and are drug across the media as a fruitcake.
“We have a good show for you tonight.” We have different versions of Americanized English. You keep taking things I write out of context, but most of the responsibility lies on the writer. It is the tower of babel all over again. I just can’t get to surgery soon enough(c-5/c-6).
We will see what the newest non-head binded elongated skull DNA outcome is in November when LA marzuli’s movie comes out.September 9, 2019 at 6:47 pm #156384
I am not convinced, but if he actually puts it on the internet Thinker thunker could do a good review of it and maybe convince me. There are only a couple youtube channels I take seriously Wes, Vic and Bob.September 9, 2019 at 2:30 pm #156373
Denise F: All questions are good ones. From what I have researched the foramen magnum is different on the non-head binded elongated skull. Head binding cannot scrunch you cerebellum like that without serious repercussions. So it is theorized that the brain inside must have a different composition. But like knobby says it is all theories. Nobody knows for sure (just like Sasquatch) because there is very little research going on by mainstream science other than to discredit anything that doesn’t jive with their theories (educated guesses).
Knobby: There is a clear difference between head binded and not head binded elongated skulls. The head binded ones didn’t come up with unknown DNA and I do not believe any mainstream scientist that doesn’t do the research. Just like the ones that say Sasquatch is a fairy tale. Believe whatever you want. As for sensationalizing fringe topics that is what this whole website does and I have no problem with it.September 8, 2019 at 10:24 pm #156345
Steven B: Yes I know they only push one side. That experience killed any credible feelings I had left of the media. It really opened my eyes and it is so obvious after you wake up. This was 10+ yrs ago.September 8, 2019 at 6:35 pm #156337
Knobby: I never said Melba contributed to the elongated skull results. The context of my point is she is not alone in coming up with unknown dna and getting muffed by scientism. Her unknown Sasquatch DNA and Marzuli/Foerster’s elongated skull DNA. I am willing to bet there are people with unknown DNA. DNA knowledge is really in its infancy. It is pretty interesting and scary at the same time.
Believe what you want in the end the truth is the truth, even if it goes against popular belief. I have been interviewed by king 5 on the gun issue. I am pro-gun and they manipulated what I said to sound anti-gun. The local news wanted to interview me again and I politely declined. I do not believe anything I here anywhere until I do some research and decide myself.September 7, 2019 at 3:47 pm #156283
Knobby: I do respect your research.September 7, 2019 at 1:19 pm #156278
Knobby: Sasquatch: I know they have necks but certainly nobody claims they have long necks like Marzuli claims the elongated skulls had that is the context of my statement. Ron Moorehead speculated they could be Sasquatch skulls.
Elongated skulls: Here is the problem there are thousands of elongated skulls. Cradle boarded and not cradle boarded who knows what skulls were in what study. I have seen with my own eyes the 2 side by side and there is no doubt as to the difference in size.
Both teams(Marzuli, Forester) have medical DR’s, anthropologist’s and coroner’s.
You watched the forester video did you watch the link above it? only 4 minutes.
My whole point bringing this up is Melba is not alone. Both studies came up with unknown DNA and both studies are discredited by mainstream scientism (yes it is a religion).September 6, 2019 at 9:51 pm #156250
Paul A: Yes I had not mentioned the foramen magnum being different. LA Marzuli’s team theorized that they had longer necks by the placement of the foramen magnum. This lined up with his theory of them being biblical giants because one of the tribes named in the bible means longnecked ones. It goes against Ron Moorehead thinking they could be Sasquatch skulls. Sasquatch have quite the opposite by most eye witness accounts some say no neck at all.September 6, 2019 at 4:19 pm #156221September 6, 2019 at 4:01 pm #156219
Gumshoguy: Excellent work: I do not get these politicians that promise a free education when it is already free. I know they mean credentials but credentials mean nothing to me. I have several MD and PHD friends. I love them but they are not the smartest friends that I have. The most intelligent friends I have are balanced between book and hands on knowledge.
My point is with an internet connection you have access to all the knowledge one can retain. You Gumshoguy do exactly what I try to encourage people to do. Some of the accounts you listed are not convincing the way you briefly(concise) wrote them. I am sure there is more info to the accounts that give you that impression.
I would hope that you publish your findings and/or do an episode.
Yes there are some terms here and there in his books. Ape, bearman, dogman come up several times not to mention the one account that actually says “bigfoot took her”. There are also accounts that lead one to believe UFO. Like Todd who’s phone was on and it sounded like he was flying threw the air. I am drawing a blank on his last name its like Gleib or something similar. They found him bobbing in a pond like a cork.September 6, 2019 at 2:01 am #156189
Knobby: It seemed out of place in his book and is well past the middle if I remember correctly. It is one of his stories that stands out most in my memory from reading. Another that really stands out is a guy went missing and all they found was a shoe in the top of a tall tree. Also CA and in the west coast edition. I am sure there are some in his other books that would stand out if I ever get around to reading them.