Nov 19

Mattsquatch Presents: Is the Dogman actually good?

Matt writes “Let’s talk about the orgins of the Dogman and if they serve a purpose for the greater good.”

5 Responses to “Mattsquatch Presents: Is the Dogman actually good?”

  1. RICHIE E

    I BELIEVE THEY ARE PURE EVIL …. ” THE DOGMEN ” MAYBE DEMONIC BY NATURE OR SKINWALKERS LIKE THE NATIVE INDIANS IN THERE STORYS , I WOULD HAVE A UNDERWEAR MOMENT RIGHT THAN IT THERE !!! OR HEARTACHE LOL ?

  2. Diana M

    If they are a natural creature they must have filled an ecological niche at some point, but for the life of me, other than taking out a Mountain Giant, a Wooly Rino or a Mastadon, I can’t imagine what it might have been. They seem like major over-kill in this day and age.

  3. Eva B

    I don’t believe in dog man. Maybe because I’ve seen one in 1996 in upstate NY. It was along the ridgeline of this mountain. It had a tail and was massive. But, the snout didn’t protrude like a canines. I think these dog men are just misidentification of sasquatches. They may be deformed due to inbreeding, who knows? The legs on this creature weren’t formed like a canines hind end. Some human beings are born with stubby tails. They generally have them removed so they won’t be ridiculed. Another thing, we all know that sasquatches cannot get a manicure or pedicure in the wild, so naturally they have nails.

Leave a Reply