Matt writes “Let’s talk about the orgins of the Dogman and if they serve a purpose for the greater good.”
Sasquatch Chronicles Blog
5 Responses to “Mattsquatch Presents: Is the Dogman actually good?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Chris K
Maybe against Vampires.
Steven B
“…purpose for the greater good.”
I always cringe when I hear that phrase – it always means that some other poor schmuck has to “pay the price”.
RICHIE E
I BELIEVE THEY ARE PURE EVIL …. ” THE DOGMEN ” MAYBE DEMONIC BY NATURE OR SKINWALKERS LIKE THE NATIVE INDIANS IN THERE STORYS , I WOULD HAVE A UNDERWEAR MOMENT RIGHT THAN IT THERE !!! OR HEARTACHE LOL ?
Diana M
If they are a natural creature they must have filled an ecological niche at some point, but for the life of me, other than taking out a Mountain Giant, a Wooly Rino or a Mastadon, I can’t imagine what it might have been. They seem like major over-kill in this day and age.
Eva B
I don’t believe in dog man. Maybe because I’ve seen one in 1996 in upstate NY. It was along the ridgeline of this mountain. It had a tail and was massive. But, the snout didn’t protrude like a canines. I think these dog men are just misidentification of sasquatches. They may be deformed due to inbreeding, who knows? The legs on this creature weren’t formed like a canines hind end. Some human beings are born with stubby tails. They generally have them removed so they won’t be ridiculed. Another thing, we all know that sasquatches cannot get a manicure or pedicure in the wild, so naturally they have nails.