Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Feb 20

Interesting image captured

Trey McCollister ‎writes “Here’s an older photo from an older game cam that I’ve had for a few years and was just giving permission from one of the owners to share. Dan Ricke and Vicky thank you for letting me share.”

 

 

 

Here is an artist rendition of what he thought the creature looked like:

 

29 Responses to “Interesting image captured”

  4. Trey

    Bear is also the one that showed it to me first. I’ve had to hold this for over a year which I proudly did because the owners didn’t want it public. But now they have said I could post it so enjoy.

  8. Matt Y

    What are we supposed to be seeing here? And where is the full image? That’s a crop of a larger shot which would undoubtedly show more of whatever this actually is. My sense is that it’s not shown because it’s a tree further back in the distance.

  14. Ernest M

    To quote Laugh-In’s Artie Johnson; “Verry interesting.”
    It is worth taking note of because it is quite possible we are looking at the real deal.
    Thanks for posting Trey.

  18. Steve K

    Yeah interesting, but I think it may be just matrixing. If you look closely at the lips in the original they are suggested by two faint twigs on the left side of the face. His/her left eye flash reflection seems to not be quite where it should be. Its right side of the face is defined by a twig running the whole way up.
    But, what an awesome rendition by the artist !

  26. winkatme

    WOW! Now I understand why people are so traumatized after seeing one of these! It kind of looks like an alien and gorilla hybrid. Those EYES! It doesn’t look like it’s from earth.

  27. winkatme

    If anyone has encountered a creature that looks like this can you let us know? WES start typing. Is this what you saw that night when you were with WOODY? If your shaking your head YES I can’t see you LOL. Please type your response Thank You, Wink

Leave a Reply

Jul 25

Interesting Image Captured

I found this image interesting. I really like how the guys went back to make sure it was not a dead fall tree or a bush. I am unwilling to go as far as the video title states but it is interesting.

6 Responses to “Interesting Image Captured”

  6. Jeffrey H

    It’s a great catch!!? These guys have some serious forest cred!! It would be great to have an update with them on SC. They have some good videos and its worth following their channel. Mark himself is suited up with at least 3 cameras. It’s like Scott Carpenter, with the camera pointing behind them. It’s a great way of catching some good material. Lookin forward to their next venture. BTW, I think they have a movie coming out very soon!

Leave a Reply

Sep 5

Interesting image captured

This is a closer look at the image captured by Mike Hursh

15 Responses to “Interesting image captured”

  1. m99

    Thanks Wes.

    We saw this yesterday and spent some time watching the various youtubes, commentators, etc… At one point in a video Brent even said, could this thing in the middle be dead? Scary and as horrifying as it may seem, it does look dead, AND looks human. That’s what we thought, anyway… one, the forehead seems to recede and looks like an exposed skull, two the nose looks human, and three, the eye sockets are black. I thought I saw some an eye in there. I posed the question: does it look like a corpse ? (in the forum yesterday), but no one addressed the question. It looks scary, whatever it is.

    We talked about it and concluded that the various researchers should look “up” more often. Another interesting point we considered is the fact a lot of good evidence seems to happen “by accident”. That thing in the tree does not look like a baby Sasquatch to me/us (my husband and I).

    • m99

      Michael ~ I saw this on tv a couple years ago, if it’s the same one I’m thinking. I don’t watch things expressing MF and the like. I think it’s immature, rude, and unnecessary. Oh yes, when we were 13 and 14 we cursed like sailors, not when we grew up. Plus, civility and respect need to be brought back in style.

      ~As far as the BF in a cage, I’ve actually spoken with someone who was told by a state park ranger in Texas, that he’d witnessed one in a cage being delivered (via a helicopter), back into the wild. The problem is – he said, she said, they did, those did. If someone would interview that guy who spoke to the ranger, and get him on the show, and or possibly both the witness and ranger, it’d be more believable.

      _And the BF face in the video above looks kinda like Harry of Harry and the Henderson’s.

      • Michael L

        I thought it was an entertaining decent fake. The arms weren’t long enough, the face was not African looking nor did it have the right eyes and teeth. It was just something to observe and test your abilities to perceive the flaws, nothing more…
        Michael1lion

    • Robinson W

      That was for a television show that was supposed to be fictional. It states it after every commercial break and in the deception of the show … It wasn’t even as hoax-y as the mermaids or megaladon … Guys come on.

  8. James B

    Come on, really where does he get an arm out of that? It’s a stretch. Completely matches the surrounding branches in color. Also when he scrolls down to reference the picture of that clearly fake gorillasquatch, come on man.

  10. Robinson W

    This really is an exercise in pareidolia, isn’t it? The really great end of this subject matter is Wes’ witness encounter recountings—with the outlining of shadows in foliage being the low end of that spectrum … Oh well. No harm; no foul.

    Keep up the great interviews, and they will come. Oh yes, they will come.

Leave a Reply

Aug 4

Interesting Image Captured

Had this sent to me today. I really do not know the back story on it yet but it was taken from a game cam in AZ.The report I received is that the person who put up the game cam kept having his deer feed eaten, what should have lasted a month or two only last a day or two.

The ear appears to be in a strange spot. The eyes in the picture really throw me off, it appears very “monkey like” and some of the researchers I sent the picture too say its a wild pig others think it is a cougar, most though are unsure.

Anyway I thought I would share. I will update you if I am able to get more information on this. I was able to get the “ok” to publish the picture publicly.

 

SASQUATCH ON GAMECAM

79 Responses to “Interesting Image Captured”

  1. Frankie P

    Well, that is just cool. Very interesting indeed. Haven’t heard very much about the ears of bf’s so, depending on the type etc., why not? Also, I’d expect shorter/thinner hair if it is resident in Az. due to the heat and landscape, lighter color too. It’s as possible as most I’ve seen pictured – you?

  3. Susan B

    In a pig’s eye, that’s not a pig’s eye!!! Or is it a boar’s eye. It certainly isn’t a cougar eye unless the cougar’s face is deformed into a monkey shape. Ewwww, creepy picture.

  4. Kent A

    I think it’s two separate pigs. The right side is the back side of a pig facing left. While the half face shot is another one looking into the camera. Thoughts? I might be way off on that.

  5. Tammy C

    doesn’t look like a “feline” eye to me…i had a pet pig and this doesn’t look like that to me either (unless wild pigs differ? That i don’t know because i have never seen one up close)
    Not sure but very interested to hear any more info ur able to gather on it

    • BrokenMind27

      I don’t believe they have feline eyes, with all due respect. Loyd Pie had pictures in his book , Everything You Know is Wrong. I think some people have picked up on this and use it in their story. People that I believe have actually seen one say it looks similar to the picture in his book, but they don’t describe the eyes as cat like. Just an FYI, not trying to be rude.

  8. m99

    The eye looks human, the ear looks oddly placed as a BF’s have been described to be (by your witnesses), and the body seems primate from its stance. It looks youngish too. Could it be a Juvenile BF? I vote yes.

  9. Vinnie G

    Yes, it looks like a primate, but I’ve worked with multiple species of old & new world Non-human primates over the past 25 years. Face looks similar to a Cynomolgus macaque or an African Green, but the body & shoulders are WAY too large as compared to those species…?

  11. Steven J

    Based on comparing images of various animal eyes, I would have to lean towards hog. However, details such as camera position and height would be nice. Interesting pic, but just not quite enough to identify.

  14. Kathy S

    Totally baffled… a pig, wild or not would have a floppy ear around 2 o’clock above the face on the top of it’s head. Placement would be between 1 & 2 o’clock of the face on the top of a cougars head though the ears would not be floppy. If this was indeed a bf, he/she is certainly hunched down or on all fours. Interesting pic!!

  16. pam

    Not a pigs eye, not pigs ear either. Looks like a Gugwe ; and the thing I saw a bit-.
    The ear is small and kinda pointed like it but without the tufts, head shape is right. I dunno?

  18. Brad S

    I’m laughing that anybody said this is a wild hog. Whoever said that has never seen a wild hog apparently. This is not a cat either. It’s an interesting picture. More convincing than most pictures of supposed Bigfoot (big Feet?) where there’s a bush in the way and it’s blurry and could be a dog or anything else. This actually looks like what I imagine Bigfoot would look like. Not saying it’s real but I could be.

  27. Michele S

    Before anyone can make any kind of guess, we have to know how high the camera was. It is just a shot in the dark until we know that important piece of info. Secondly, how do we even know that “ear” is in fact an ear? It certainly looks like an ear, but it could be anything.

    I want to get pumped about it, but I will wait until we get a few facts, and, or, someone does a breakdown of the photo.

  31. Steven L

    I live in az and it’s not all Desert or high desert. We have forests, snow, etc. Common to have sightings up north oround the Mogollon Rim.(Mogy on) we call it the Mogollon Monster. That area is high elevation and line trees. Deep forest. Beautiful area. You can drive 2 hours in any direction and end up in a totally different climate.

  32. SantiamLady

    I’m with Pam! ?? The eye doesn’t look right for a Sas. Most reports talk about how their eyes look very dark, iris brown, not light color. ? What then? Wel t sure isn’t a hog! ??
    Too me that eye ball looks wolf-like. ? Dogman? Or a Gugwe?

  34. Scott D

    Could be a juvenile, Remember everyone game cams take shots in total darkness. That would explain the pupils being fully open, to allow more light in the eye to assist with their night vision. I haven’t read all of the comments that have been entered, so if this was answered before please excuse me. Any word on how high the camera was setup?

  35. Scott D

    Remember everyone game cams take shots in total darkness. That would explain the pupils being fully open, to allow more light in the eye to assist with their night vision. I haven’t read all of the comments that have been entered, so if this was answered before please excuse me. Any word on how high the camera was setup?

  37. Robinson R

    Look up Arizona havelina and look it’s eyes, not even close. They have heavily furred brows with long lashes surrounding their eyes. This pics looks like there is little to no fur/hair around the eye, weird.

  42. Greg T

    I’m in the not a hog category for this picture. If you isolated the eye, it’s similar to the link that Steven put up. But too many other things wrong for me. If it is a hog on the game cam, then the guy that took it knows and is trying to fool everyone. The reason I say that is because every time, except for maybe once, that I have game cam pics of hogs at my deer feeder, there are about 100 pictures where they mill around eating everything there. I don’t know the settings on this guy’s game cam, but it would be odd to me to take only one picture of a hog peeking at the camera without getting all the other shots of it eating corn. If it’s a real pic, it’d be tough for me to walk into that stand the next morning in the dark with. Monkeypossumhog thing creeping around.

  44. Black-YETI

    Look I have over 20 game cameras and have taken I bet between 50 thousand to 100 thousand pictures with them.
    One summer a few years ago I took over 15 thousand in Iowa alone. In the pic I see a tree to the right…its faint but I see trees.
    The pic has the animal about 3 feet from the camera looking right in it. Often game will sniff the camera and you get pics of a nose with wiskers. In the above pic I think its one of something. Browning make a decent camera with decent quality.
    That eye looks real to me an its not a hog or a deer. Man it looks monkeyish to me.

    A few years ago Fred Eichler took a trail cam pic of what looks like bigfoot. It was in AZ or Idaho I think?
    https://rwridley.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/frame-1.jpg?w=460&h=261

    Anyway he is a pretty high profile with a serious backer EASTON so I don’t think he needs to make himself look like an ass
    posting fake bigfoot pics.
    I was in Iowa at the deer classic and Fred was there. I so wanted to talk to him and see his reaction when I brought up the subject but he was busy.

  45. Black-YETI

    BTW I got some solid recon of a very scary valley in the mtns of Colorado. I’m headed there and plan on camping there for 2 wks.
    I’m either gone to kill a bear with a bow or get my head popped off by BF. I’m looking for a new 44 mag with a 4inch BBL.
    I expect lots of action.

  47. Duke S

    Considering the location, a longshot guess might be one of those Devil Monkeys, it could be a squatchlet though. I Really hope that’s what it is, not a damn Devil Monkey!

  49. Duke S

    Seriously, the eye and area around it does look like a Javelina, black and white image of the photo is making this tougher than it would be if it were in color…

  50. Duke S

    Or is it in color? If it is a color image I would lean towards Javelina pretty heavily…..one facing away in the background, it’s hindquarters showing, another up front getting part of it’s face in the shot…..

  51. Tony s

    Did we figure out how far off the ground the camera was set? If not, conjecture is somewhat irrelevant. That being said it kinda has a lupine or canine feel to it. Or is that just me? Certainly not feline. They shape of the iris is all wrong. Not a horse, not a cow, not a deer.
    Any potentials in the weasel family maybe? They are curious little suckers and might just get right up on the lens. Doesn’t look like a wild boar eye and it seems unlikely that a javelina would be big enough to get eye to eye with a deer camera set up. But…. If we don’t know the height then we don’t really know anything.
    Can we be sure that that is an ear and not ruffled fur? If it was a wolf or coyote the ears would pointing up and would be out of frame.
    If I were a betting man, I wouldn’t bet on this one.

  58. Kyle S

    To me it looks like a baby being held by a big one. The fac ed would obviously be the baby’s and to the right side of the pic is the big ones shoulder/chest. Just my opinion, it’s the real deal or a great fake

  59. Kyle S

    To me it looks like a baby being held by a big one. The face would obviously be the baby’s and to the right side of the pic is the big ones shoulder/chest. Just my opinion, it’s the real deal or a great fake

  60. William L

    The video with an eye of a possible creature on YouTube, I believe is a video posted by M.K. Davis from a trail cam on a habituation sight in Texas. He posted quite a few videos from this habituation sight, as he put it, in the deep south. It was later revealed to be in Texas and in Eastern Texas to be precise, I believe.

  61. Martin Z

    Researchers have always said that the ears of a sasquatch are unusually small and flat along the side of the head. The hair is uniform with the grain in the same direction and pigs hair is much more coarse. I vote young sasquatch.
    ☆VOTE TRUMP☆

  63. MaryCurtin B

    I am sitting w/my dear friends, Sherri & Ron, who own the game cam that took thus picture back on June 25th, 2016. Despite their excitement & intregue at having captured this image, based on legal advice, & with a copyright pending, they have only allowed a BFRO researcher to transfer this image to his computer. NOBODY has had their permission to publish &/or distribute this image. Despite our friendship of many years, due to the pending copyright, they were unable to share it with us, or even their own family members electronically, in any format. Questions will be answered by Sherri & Ron, in due time. They tell me right now that I can tell you the image was captured in the mountains of Arizona.

Leave a Reply

Jun 16

Interesting image captured

Robert Dodson captured an image of what appears to be a bigfoot lying in the brush at his research location in Southeastern Oklahoma.

13 Responses to “Interesting image captured”

  4. Robert D

    Dodson has some great audio/ video this looks very like a juvenile to me. Thanks for sharing but to be clear “as an Okie from Pittsburgh County” Dodson hardly has an accent. ?

  6. William L

    There is an even better picture of a Bigfoot face in the video “bigfoot hunter – so you call yourself a researcher” it starts around 2:36 look about mid screen at pine tree then scan left about 10 inches or so in the bush. You can’t miss it. There might even be a couple more, one lower & just to left of tree and another on the right and a little higher than the second and about the same distance from the tree as the first, easy to see face.

  8. Charles R

    Inconclusive – always will be hidden inside dark areas of thick brush, however this is one of the more interesting ones and looks face (ape,human ) like. Over the years folks have posted on the internet faces in the bush, some have sent them to me direct. Not a single one can I say is for sure, most are garbage, others like this very interesting and distinct possiblities especially if you know the person and how they operate. Robert Dodson is a character and a good researcher.

  9. Roberta S

    NO matter how I try I cannot make this photo a bunch of leaves. If I was told, “You are looking at a gorilla in Africa somewhere” I would say, ” So it is”. Very good photo.

  10. Hillary K

    I have a short story for y’all. My kids range from 9-2 years old…and all 4 of them were playing hide and go seek in the back yard. We have a row of peonies along the fence….and when my youngest would crouch down, he would disappear. (He could see us, but we couldn’t see him). Anyhow, this pic tells me, Bigfoot is still….master champion of hide-n-go seek! Would not want to find one in my peonies!! Hahah

  11. Tony s

    I must admit this is probably the best “hidden in leaves” photo I’ve seen. Pretty good detail in the eyes, brow ridge, and nose but we all know it still won’t cut it.

Leave a Reply

Feb 6

Interesting image captured

As with any and all photo’s I make no claims. This photo was sent to me and was taken from a person who works in Fish and Game. I am sharing it with you guys, sometimes it is better to get several eyes to look at a photo instead of just mine. I am trying to get more information. I would like to speak to the person on-air if I can get them to come on. I am working on it.

What do you guys and gals think? I viewed the picture on a large HD screen and the one thing that really caught my attention was the eye shine. I wanted to share it with you guys, take a look and let me know what you think.

 

save

 

 

102 Responses to “Interesting image captured”

  1. ERIC R

    Wow an interesting Picture for sure……….Not too sure on this. That eye shine looks pretty shiny. Not sure a human eye would look like those. Get that person on the show Bro!!

    • JOHN E

      ERIC , I AM LOOKING AT THE TOES FINGERS REALLY CANT SEE ENOUGH BUT HEY THIS TYPE FITS LONG HAIR ON ARMS , AND HARDLY NO HAIR AROUND THE FACE AND UPPER FOREHEAD. IF THIS IS REAL WELL ITS A OUTSTANDING PICTURE .

  2. craig b

    Pics like this never capture the massive muscular bulk, the width, the height of what so many eyewitness reports describe. Frankly, so many pics simply look like a person in a cheap costume because it’s very tough to hoax the sheer size and muscularity of a squatch

  4. Lucas J

    I have never seen a Sasquatch but from listening to the show I thought they had “hair” covered body’s. This looks a lot like fur to me. What are other people’s oppinion on the hair/fur? Irregardless my ass is packin whin I’m in the woods out here in east Texas. If I see one I hope it’s at 70 mph as I pass on by.

  6. Justin H

    Those legs are almost the same size as those tree trunks. The eye shine is interesting. You can (not well) but make the broad shoulders and traps going to the neck; which is almost non-existent. The hair seems to blend well with the leaves and environment around it. I wouldn’t say this creature is “small” without a real size comparison on the photo we really cannot map out how big or small it is. If this is in fact authentic. I can definitely see how these creatures blend so well in their environment. I’d like to know where in the country this game cam photo was taken. Very interesting photo!

  8. Frankie P

    I like it. Long arms, short legs, massive size. Without knowing more like where, how big the trees are, can’t really size it, but it’s definitely “Stout”. Eye shine – good! Especially from that close up. I like it.

  9. Russell S

    The eye shine is interesting. But regardless of what others say, under the right conditions human eyes will shine too, such as seeing people with redeye in photos. Secondly, the subject is obviously walking. Look at the supporting leg. It is straight, According to the experts, Sasquatch don’t straighten their legs out like we do when walking. And finally, the length of the arms, unless they are bent more than the camera is catching, seems short. Again, I am not saying this isn’t a Sasquatch, I’m saying these could be discrepancies.

  12. DonRay

    Well… the legs took me a minute too see what i was seeing… The leg on the right, is the right leg of creature..I dont think those legs are straight Russell S… The creature has a hell of a twist going on… I can see bare spots on the inside of its right leg, where the left leg would rub against it,, Ankle, knee and also side of belly, where the arm would rub… If this much detail goes into these costumes now, its going to make pics like this more difficult to identify,, I dont believe that costume designers put that much thought into it…… i’m 75% on this one being real…… I would imagine twisting in a mask would make it difficult for both eyes to show shine..although not impossible,,….. Thanx for sharing Wes…..Ciao

  16. Pat T

    I sure hope thinker thunker gets a hold of this one as he is great at breaking everything down. His ability to contrast height, width arm length etc. is top notch. Usually comes to the conclusion that no it is not a hoax. Sure hope such is the case with this as it looks legit and if real a great pic. Thanx Wes and hope you can get this guy on

  18. Pat T

    I sure hope thinker thunker gets a hold of this one as he is great at breaking everything down. His ability to contrast height, width arm length etc. is top notch. Usually comes to the conclusion that no it is not a hoax. Sure hope such is the case with this as it looks legit and if real a great pic. Thanx Wes and hope you can get this guy on.

    • Jody M

      I agree get ThinkerThunker on this. The hands are the blurriest part which means they were moving the fastest which is consistent with the marked primate-like arm swing in the Patty film. I think it’s legit.

    • DonRay

      I noticed that Mary, but it could be caused by movement… those lines are in the direction of movement, for each body part.. im still on the fence because of forehead, i’ve seen that forehead in costumes before… but the lack of hair where chaffing would occur, has got me,,,we’ll say, interested in pic.. 🙂

  20. June P

    At first, I couldn’t see a long left arm, but then I refocused on the crescent shape down near the left thigh/ knee area. Could it be a slightly curled hand? I think the being’s right arm is a bit blurry (maybe due to movement?) The head looks like what a lot of people describe….is the leg that appears nearer to the camera the left leg? I guess it would have to be, as the right is more down hill and the foot is buried in the leaf litter….hmmmm????Very interesting.
    The eyes are creepy!

  21. Russell S

    Hey DonRay!
    Man! You’re seeing things I can’t! The picture isn’t that clear. If you’re seeing bare spots, If a costume is rented out regularly, there could be spots wher the costume rubs against itself. A costume shop isn’t going to pay to have it fixed, they’d just wait and replace it. As far as the supporting leg, if it’s bent, the bend is negligible. It looks pretty much straight to me, and it appears to me that the figure is attempting to look back while walking, a lot like Patty on the Patterson/Gimlin film. What can be considered traps, may be. But is it possible that it’s long hair to make it appear that it has little neck?

    Again, I can’t tell if it’s legitimate or not, but There’s enough here to convince me that more investigation into the photo is needed, regardless if it’s legit or not.

    Questions need to be asked… Were there footprints? do you have any other pics of this thing getting to this point? If not, how did it get there without setting off the camera as it walked to where it is? Do you have pictures of the area in the daytime? Judging from the location, are there any measurements taken of the surrounding trees to give an estimation of the height of the creature? Why was the camera at that location? Etc.

    • DonRay

      I agree Russell with all that..the leg is slightly bent,, but if you mark the approx center of hip knee ankle,, the bend to me looks clearer…. Measure the arms to legs, they are very close….and the limbs bend in the middle…. Also,, i shouldnt have said bare spots, i mean lighter spots,on the inside of limbs(Where chaffing would occur).. The outside of limbs has fuller darker hair, which is consistent with most animals…… Im still on the fence, i just find some things interesting… We do need location info,,size of those trees would be nice….DonRay

  23. June P

    Oh shoot, and another thing- that position of the elbow makes that arm look pretty long. Our elbows hit above our last rib- that ting’s looks a bit longer. ????????????

  24. jamie smith

    It is definitely interesting but what is the fuzzy thing to the right in the picture, I’m just asking because it caught my attention, is it just me but I just can’t figure out what it is ? Or is it just one of those out of focus blurs that if you look long enough you see what you want too ?

  25. Eric H

    Just doesnt seem quite right…… the arm color changes at the shoulder, too much like a seem and fabric changing direction

    also, where the hip meets the stomach seems to lack definition…….

    the body language seems right though……. the position of the head/angle,
    Just not convinced… but hope its real…… very much looking forward to having someone prove it.

  26. Christopher N

    I’ve seen that balding head pattern on costumes. Can anyone reference a sighting report that describes that kind of bald forehead? There are probably ways to hoax eye shine. Good observations by Mary H and Eric H. This image looks suspect to me as well.

  29. Melanie W

    Wes, was the image sent to you as a jpeg, or did you scale down the dpi to make it web friendly. There’s no way anyone could get much out of a compressed jpeg like this. If you have a higher res file of it, I would be happy to see if I can get some detail out of it.

    Also… If that’s eye shine… It could easily be added. I speak as a professional photographer for 25 years. Just saying.

    So. With what is presented here… Who the heck knows if it’s real.

  31. Kathryn C

    Everything about this say real to me, and even the upper body has turned with the head when it looks at the cam. It feels right to me. I think it’s an amazing photo caught of the real thing.

  32. Robert V

    I’ve never witnessed a Sasquatch personally. I’m probably the worst at guessing which ones are real or not. My concern is the height of the creature and the lack of a muscular skeleton. I’m not saying this isn’t one, nor am I going to say it is one, just voicing a concern.

    Bob

  34. Vince B

    Looking at the evidence…..I can not be too sure but….

    The right arm looks a bit short and does not look proportial to typical sasquatch which have a much longer arm ratio than a human does.
    See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EicVEOtm1A from ThinkerThunker and you will see what I mean. Also the enormous girth of sasquatch in general usually impresses the eye witness and they usually can see definition, even through hair. I get none of that with this picture. It looks like it could definitely be a costume.

    I also can’t pick out the facial features such as a nose and mouth which are usually pretty evident according to eyewitness accounts. I can’t be 100% sure, but it seems to me to be a costume. And this is coming from someone who is not a skeptic.

  36. Brian C

    It would have been great if the owner of the game cam had taken another pic with himself standing in the same spot so we can have something to compare the scale.

  37. thomas w

    wes please please get us a Bob Garrett pic from a trail cam and say “ok guys, this is the end all be all real thing coming from Bob.” then we have something to hold this up to. please and i thought on some old episodes Bob said they would indeed release some thru You Wes… and folks if I missed something like an epic upload Please correct me!

  39. Mike B

    Ok,hears what I got.first,i dont use a computer.i use a tablet.much better resalution and with a touch screen,i can enlarge as much as I want.cons….no spell check on rhe early ones.
    ok.about the arms,they do look longer than human arms.i had my adult(lol)sons stand forward and sideways to me.oh yeah,there longer.the beast doesn’t apear to be walkin,hes twisting.look at the stripes in the hair.those aint stripes,thatts the hair blowing sideways as it turns.i could be wrong,but the right arm seems to side throwing somethin.you might want to ask the sender if the camera looked likeit had been rocked or if there were rocks around the tree that held the camera.or,it could just be the arm was flung out as the beastie was twisting.lastly,the head is to far forward on the shoulders.the human neck dont go that way.again,referencing my sons.so folks.thats what I got.let the bashing begin. Mike

  43. Jeffrey H

    It’s a ghillie suit, when you enlarge the pic look at the left foot & you will see the toe of a boot. The eye area also makes it look like a ghillie suit without camo paint on. It’s a very interesting photo and it was a great try too! ???? For the effort!

  46. Jonah N

    The eyes look like a light colored skin individual in a mask. Very similar to eye shine in a black and white photo, but not quite. The arms don’t look muscular and they are human length. The legs are long. If it was a Squatch it wouldn’t be facing the camera, it would be getting the hell out of Dodge. Some one mentioned it looks fat in the belly. I don’t think a Squatch would have much fat there. This is no Squatch, it’s a person in a furry suit. Smells like someone playing jokes on Sasquatch Fans…..again.

  47. Synbios

    I feel I am seeing seams around the shoulder area and at the wrist joint. It reminds me of a picture Wes already posted a while back with some costume with a cardboard saying “HARDCORE#Bigfootnik2012 #Beastmode” it has the exact seam placement.

    I believe Christine may have already posted possibly the same costume.

  49. Amy D

    I don’t know… I’m with the others who say the arms are too short… Those hang about as long as a persons, whereas people’s encounters usually mention the arms hang down to the knees if not just past… That’s the only thing hanging me up on its authenticity…

  52. Mark B

    Many comments posted pro and con on this one. I must say as for me…I’m just not feeling it and I must emphasize the
    Words “feeling it”. And this is why, at first glance it looks like a man who has never missed a meal in his life. How fast do you think tubby here could run down a deer? Secondly arms short, legs short. Thirdly thats the same face we saw in the border patrol picture with darker makeup. And Forthly, here’s where the FEELING IT comes in, it seems with every encounter we here the witness is in total shock not believing what their eyes are showing them. Now I ask you, upon seeing this image were any of you shocked and not believing what your eyes were showing you.
    In 1964 Supreme court justice Potter Stewart was asked to define pornography he said “I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so,
    But I know it when I see it”. I’m sorry folks but in my humble opinion I’m just not seeing it.

  53. Chris B

    Looks like a fat guy in a cheap suit….That balding head has been shown to be part of popular suits before…like the aerial photo of the white bf from the boarder a few weeks ago. Jeffrey H is also on the money regarding the toe of the left boot showing. Can’t believe others haven’t picked up on that. It jumped out at me. Totally darker color then the rest of the fur. Can’t even make out hands…or even blurry hands. The costume appears to just have cuffs at the ankles and wrists…so that hands and feet aren’t a part of the costume.

  54. Robert E

    The foot looks a little odd to me. First, I do not see any toes or foot anatomy that would be consistent with reports you typically here about. like splayed toes. I have never seen one myself, but based on the eyewitness descriptions a few things in this picture seem suspect. The foot looks like a shoe covered with hair. Having never seen one I can only base my opinion against the pictures and descriptions of witnessed encounters or other documented evidence. It would be great to get some opinions of people who have actually seen one.

  55. Kay S

    Hmm, not sure about this one. Very little muscle definition. On the other hand it may be a pregnant female or an older female that gravity hasn’t been kind to. I’d love to see another photo of it.

  57. Wayne B

    As with all these images we have to try and figure out what we see and what we want to see. I want see a really good pic of a Sasquatch that leaves me in no doubt at what i’m looking at., But this one just does not look like the big huge hulking type of creature that witness describe. .It just does not have that look about it. I could be wrong but my money is on a guy in a suit trying to con us again

  66. Jane M

    Wow…..Wes, your opinion? Maybe pregnant balding female? Man oh man, she sure hit every branch when she fell out of the ugly tree! Poor old girl. If its so cold up there, why in the heck would they not have hair on head?!? Poor old granny squatch. Scratchy squatch!

  69. Brian L

    Appears to be same same costume as previous border patrol supplied hoaxed photos. This time we don’t get to see the receding fur line from above, and the person in the suit is probably fatter.

  70. Richard C

    My son’s take on this photo, he had some pretty interesting observations:

    —-
    I saw this last night and the more I looked at it I noticed a couple things that makes me think, more than likely, its authentic. The first thing is that the foot that, at first glance is the left (the trailing foot) is actually the right foot. Knowing that, you can more accurately assume the path of travel; it didn’t walk straight from right to left, it seems to have traveled at almost a 45° angle to the camera. Next is the eye shine, with the ammount of twist that is occuring here (difficult for any person to twist that much, let alone in a suit), it would be next to impossible for a mask to stay perfectly fitted to a person while looking back at the camera and give eye shine from both eyes. Lastly, this trail cam had to be at a decent distance, not too close, but far enough, I just wish there was something to put to scale with it. I can make assumptions to size baised on the trees, but they are only assumptions. This “thing” turns to look at the camers, either it heart the cam go off, OR it can actually see IR lights (something I’ve speculated about from the start of my interest). Just my 2 cents…

  73. Mark T

    If it’s real, I would assume with a gut like that it’s pregnant and not a male.

    It doesn’t have the muscular build or wide shoulders that I saw on a big male near Mt. Rainier years ago.

  76. Jim B

    The arm and leg proportions look entirely human, and there is very little muscular definition. The enhanced photo close ups of the eyes look very clear and defined–which seems to indicate but not prove absolutely an artificial source. That said, as blurred as many of the details of the body form are, it’s difficult to say. But I would rate it somewhere between apparent hoax and ambiguous, at best.

  81. Robert V

    Hello,

    I’m not sure one way or the other. The only interesting thing to me is, if it’s real, it noticed it’s picture being taken…wasn’t happy about it.

    Bob

Leave a Reply