Feb 14

Watch: Salt Fork River in Utah-Part 2

 

 
Published on Mar 3, 2013

Description by witnesses:
Hey guy’s… We went back 4 days after the first video was posted and it was eating us up not knowing where the track’s might have led to. But when we went back a lot of snow melted and it was hard to find good prints, we did go up the mountain side follow tracks that seemed similar when we got to the top there we a lot of tracks going different directions some you cant see from the camera, the camera batteries were dying and so we took the tracks to the right and this is what we found, we don’t know what was laying there let us know what u guys think. We hope you enjoyed.. Thanks for watching.

22 Responses to “Watch: Salt Fork River in Utah-Part 2”

    • Mark B

      LOL. i don’t know if he was scared. Did he say he was scared? HA HA.
      Honestly though this is some good stuff. That has to be the largest collection of possible bigfoot hairs I’ve ever seen. The places where it seemed to sit and rest were awfully slimy looking.possible body oil residue. That gooey hairy stinky clump he was holding may have been semen but I bet it’s snot.Ha!

    • Mark B

      Do elk or moose walk on top of their tracks in a straight line? Just saying. And in some of those tracks you could count the toes. I forget how many toes do elk and moose have again?

  1. Jeff K

    There are ungulate prints paralleling much of the track way making comparison very straight forward. The unknown tracks are well over an order of magnitude larger than any of the adjacent ungulate tracks.

  2. larry h

    I hope someone told these goobers that some of the tracks they filmed were very small, and the one they measured was from a melting track which would enlarge the size after four days of melting, by their own admission. And climbing that mountain makes your foot look smaller, come on guys admit it either your easy too fool or your faking it, but either way those are not real tracks made by bigfoot, I believe there is such thing as bigfoot but people like you make the rest of us look like country bumpkins, because your lame films and tracks leads everyone to believe that we are all the same. So just give it a rest.

  3. Derek G

    I copied this address for anyone who might be interested in taking a look at various animal tracks that can be found in North American forests. http://photolabels.co/animals/609959/nature-study-animal-tracks/

    I saw a few comments mentioning the tracks might be Moose tracks. I hunt moose in Northern Ontario and although there are moose in Northern Utah I can guarantee you the tracks filmed were not moose, Trust me. Whatever made those tracks sank fairly deep into the snow which rules out a rabbit. Supposing it is less a singular paw or footprint and possibly a body track left by a rabbit jumping into the snow every 5 to 5.5 feet consistently. Besides, a rabbit can jump in snow effectively because it is light enough to remain somewhat on top of the snow. If a rabbit was for some reason sinking into the snow as deep as these tracks I don’t think it would be able to consistently jump 5 foot to 6 foot. Could it have been a mountain lion placing hind paw in fore paw track? 5 ft apart? That’s stretching it a bit……….
    …………Utah lions seem to be more reclusive and skittish than other populations, such as those found in Colorado and California. Most people spend years exploring the back country and never see one. Those few lucky individuals who have seen a lion in the wild have witnessed one of North America’s most impressive and powerful animals. Mountain lions inhabit territory all across Utah. According to the Division of Wildlife Resources

  4. diana m

    In my humble opinion, Mary & Joseph BigfooTay walked up for a little Valetines Day snuggle (+/- 29:00), bumped uglies , separated. *Geez, I hope he wasn’t a 2 minute man *….Fast forward a few days, one guy picked up the ‘evidence’, smelled it, threw it down.

    You, dearest Shannon, have a wicked sense of humor!!

    Happy Valentines Day

  5. Scott M

    Sorry,
    I’ve tracked too many bounding herbivores not to think it’s not one. The positioning of the tracks prior to and after the fence line give it away. I’ve been a trapper for over 30 years and tracking is the cornerstone of what I do. The other thing I noticed is as the animal was post-holing in the deep snow, as it was bounding you can notice where the legs/hooves are dragging on the leeward edge of watch hole. Lastly, notice the inconsistency of the size of the tracks, I bel it’s because the 4 hooves are landing in different patterns due to terrain and different strides. The animal that this “thing” was tracking is likely an animal that was actually persuing the herbivore such as a coyote. They couldn’t possibly have deduced which animal preceded the other based on tracks

  6. Paris A

    Looks real. Great job guys. In one hike you have found more sign than 90% of these so called “Field Experts”. Who can’t find their way from the couch to bathroom. Great to see guys outside away from a computer screen. If ya get out there, you never know what you will may find.

Leave a Reply