ThinkerThunker writes “If this IS for a fact an AI fake … how would we ever know?”
Sasquatch Chronicles Blog
12 Responses to “ThinkerThunker: Bigfoot Photo from 1981 Surfaces”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Melissa G
I just love Thinker Thunker!
Grant R
I like him he provides information on Bigfoot that I didn’t know
Darin W
I don’t agree with his measurements regarding where the hip is and such on the subject in the image, but oh well.
Charles R
It definitely is subjective to some degree in the measurements. And when an apendage such as arm or leg is bent, you can get the real 3d measurements from a 2d picture.
Mark T
I don’t know if I totally agree. I witnessed a 12-foot tall alpha male from 10 feet away near Mt. Rainier 38 years ago and it had the same body proportions as a gigantic human being.
I literally thought it was a human crossing a two lane mountain highway when I first saw it.
There is no way what I saw a dude in a monkey suit. And I know how tall it was because I measured the Hemlock branch it reached up to push out of its face as it entered rhe trees with a 12-foot long fishing rod and the needles that were at the bottom jaw line was 10 feet off the ground and the head was 2 feet taller.
I’d like to see Thinker Thunker’s Patty measurements side by side.
The photo above looks like what I saw .
Charles R
He generally uses Patty’s measurements as his guide into what proportions other Bigfoot pictures area.
Man, that is one hell of huge Bigfoot Mark T. About the tallest of which people claim. Although I think most folks, unless really close do not know 10 foot from 12 foot, me included. However you having a 12 foot rod at the right time would know. What an amazing sighting.
Mark R
Th
Mark R
ThinkerThunker takes a lot of liberties with measurements and what he calls facts.
Charles R
No doubt. In his early years, darn near everything was a Bigfoot and some were absurb. The picture here is certainly remarkable. And I for one would like to know more about it.
Charles R
And to me it looks like the legs are shorter in proportion than the torso and upper body with the side view, but who knows.
Brian D
I agree with ThinkerThunker. I also have a problem with the subjects shadow cast. It seems clearly off compared to the stature of the subject.
My opinion, this is a fake.
Brian D
Unless…from the angle of the sun, it is a female with gigantic breasts that we cannot see due to the camera angle. Doubt it though.