Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Dec 11

Someone queried Nat Geo about the possibility of funding investigation

The Bigfoot Evidence reported that someone queried Nat Geo about the possibility of funding investigation at a site of reportedly repeated sasquatch activity. This is the response:

12345572_766426690128163_2481322536492171479_n

26 Responses to “Someone queried Nat Geo about the possibility of funding investigation”

    • JOHN E

      LOOK HOW MAD WE ARE ……RIGHTFULLY SO …THAT’S IT I AM RETIRED A VERY GOOD HUNTER ….SINCE THE 1960S ….I MAKE ENOUGH TO GO UP IN THE HILLS ….WELL I AM GOING TO COLO OR TEXAS AND I WILL SHOOT ONE AND BRING IT IN …..I DON’T MIND DOING THIS IN TEXAS I KNOW THE ONES IN TEXAS WILL KILL YOU AND EAT YOU…. I REALLY AM SICK OF THIS …IF SOME ONE IN TEXAS WANTS TO JOIN IN THIS SPRING …WELL I AM READY….SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK ….BABY ….I WILL START TO BUY WHAT I NEED WE CAN CALL IT S .C. HUNTING EXPEDITION …DO OR DIE ….I KNOW SOME ARE SAYING YOU CRAZY BUT I REALLY WANT TO TRY.

  2. David J

    You would think with Nat Geo’s film production resources, they would attempt to film sasquatch before dismissing as folklore.. A typical mainstream liberal media response from Nat-Crap-Geo!

  3. brian a

    Not so astonishing they would lend credibility to “Ray Wallace”, yet be oblivious to the research work of “Dr. Jeff Meldrum” ref. http://www.isu.edu/~meldd/ primate research who very publicly seeks to prove the existence of the unknown bi-pedal creature inhabiting the forest in North America. I suppose Professor of Anthropology for Idaho State University means nothing compared to the Ray Wallace story. At least that is what I glean from Julie Crain’s response.

  6. Paul M

    Well do ya get it people. This cabal runs the media. Tv=Radio=Newpaper=Internet yass the Net. It’s all raped up in the nice little package they would like you to belive. And most do. Well they couldn’t get away with that. Ya well guess again. Sheep El will drink from the puddle that’s pointed to. They will follow that trail that brings them back to the barn = Even if the barns on fire. It’s a Fact. So NAT. GEO. BLOWS this off like it’s a hunt for UNICORN. should not come as a shock to anyone in this audience. We seen and heard this BS for many years. So if you have eyes to see and ears to hear. Well use them.

  8. Janetta V

    Nat.Geo. knows they exist. But would get in trouble if they helped open this government covered secret up. For those of us that know that we know, that we know, we… cannot be fooled. Who cares what they all think, we don’t Nat Geo. to verify anything, as far as I’m concerned it’s already been proven, by the many credible witnesses out there dating way back. All we need is Wes. Thank you.

  9. Jay R

    Science has merely taken the form of religion requiring some form of Papal confirmation before giving acceptance. I say no to Nat Geo who refuse to accept the true nature of reality around them and will suffer in credibility when that given day arises for this most mysterious creature. I stopped subscribing to this publication 30 years ago because of their failure to accept this reality and makes me feel good too have cut my cable so I no longer have to watch such biased television programming.

  10. Rob C

    What is more unbelievable was that Ray Wallace was able to travel the world making fake imprints in several different countries!!! A very lengthy but shallow response from Nat Geo.

  12. Scott A

    1. Nat Geo should go to homes of people with daily activity but they need to see good reason to go which would mean recordings and vetting from people who they will believe who have been there.

    2. People with daily activity should be recording audio and video with what equipment they have, post it and send the link to these people in appropriate scientific fields.

    3. If you are a family with such activity around your home then please start a kickstarter or gofundme or something similar to get the money for any equipment that you need. I would donate and I imagine many other people would as well.

    4. Build a body of evidence from your property. Keep a written log of activity, writing down the time something happens, what happened, which direction and what distance for chronology and to gather data on behavior.

    I do not know all the equipment or steps that would be best but I want to see any mystery around this subject eliminated by any means necessary so that scientists will have all the evidence they need to confirm beyond the shadow of doubt that they exist.

  13. Scott

    I love the fact that “Crap Geo” gives so much credit to Ray Wallace. We are talking about a guy who spent his down time making fake wooden feet and even went so far as to put his own wife in a fur suit outside of there home in hunting season!! Wow, talk about brilliant. I guess all the press accounts, and all the mentions of a “man beast”, or “wild man” by the original people in North America must just be a misunderstanding. I mean if Ray, Bigfoot Wallace is the one who created all the hype about Sasquatch, then I suppose he is the one who painted all of the cave art that predates Christ. This is the kind of stuff that makes my blood boil…Who is this close minded, pretentious, and brash woman Julie Crain anyways? What are her qualifications on the subject of Sasquatch? Alas! Let her see what I have seen. Then you can say something on the subject. Until then, maybe she should keep her inadequate history lessons to herself. I don’t need any validation from Ms Crain, in fact I could really care less if she belives or not. But to write a letter like that, to someone who was looking to be helpful, and to spew so much trash about the subject. I’m real surprised she didn’t bring up Bob Heironimus, and how “Patty” was just a costume made up from old bear hides and burlap! I need a drink!

  14. Christian L

    I’ve always wondered if the hoaxers past, present, and future and even some of the retards on TV were actually paid and organized by our Federal overlords to discredit the real encounters and serious researchers out there….disappointed by Nat Geo but not surprised by their response….sadly.

  15. Richard C

    Hey, it’s all part of an orchestrated machine, science is no longer science. The internet and all of it’s social media are being used by organizations with deep pockets to “Manipulate” the information we get. It’s also being used to steer us in the directions they want us to go. Shows like this are “rare”, where the truth is seeked out and people are taken at their word. As long as the main stream media goes along, they can lie and distort the truth with impunity.

  20. Karen C

    Sasquatch Chronicles members are the most open minded, common sense, and practicle people out there in a world of negativity which seems to be influenceing our everyday lives…..

  21. SANDRA E

    “More than likely a myth”? Once again someone has their head in the sand! And Nat Geo to boot!! I’m having a problem believing that out of all the employees working for Nat Geo, not one of them has had an encounter. Talk about a slap in the face.

  22. Mindy V

    This is what gets me… “a number of people have seen them…” and “physical evidence is scant.” Isn’t ONE piece of physical evidence EVIDENCE? Doesn’t it only take one piece to be determined non-human primate to be indicative of something there, rather than not enough to prove that it IS there? These people are speaking from a place of ignorance. Those with knowledge and open mind know the truth. I just don’t get why they believe it to be so unlikely. Can’t wait until it is proven and watch them then.

Leave a Reply