Sasquatch Chronicles Blog

Apr 6

Solving Bigfoot’s Existence With Science

COLFAX, WA — Can the legend behind Bigfoot be explained? One world renowned author says it can through science.

8 Responses to “Solving Bigfoot’s Existence With Science”

  1. Charles R

    Well let us see. Citizen scientist or research gathers’ have been bringing in evidence much longer than my life. Where has it gotten us. What have these so called experts to turn over the casts, hair, droppings,blood samples with DNA, thousand upon thousands of sightings, some coming from highly skilled observers, done with this evidence. One of their own, Dr. Jeff Meldrum has something like 250 casts from all over the US, including some that are so good they have dermal ridges. What have these experts done for him. Ask Dr. John Bindernagle what he thinks of these so called experts. Bill Munns has spent 1000’s of hours on detailing the Patterson film and written a great technical journal on it. What have these experts done with that.

  2. joe r

    Charles,
    Here is the simple explanation as to what happens to all the evidence or better yet, why it is deemed to be a bear or that it’s contaminated, because about 99% of the Universities and scientists where these studies are being conducted at, are paid by the same group, ironically that pays the goons in the SUV’S that drive around harassing witnesses and researchers. We’re are all in the same rowboat with one oar.

  3. doug w

    What a joke. So everyone just got up today or for the last say 50 years and decided to make up a lie , get laughed at and for what? I know one thing for sure and I’m not fat and sitting on the couch. I spent most of my life hunting and in the woods 300 days a year. Now take this for what it’s worth …I have seen tracks 3 sets. I’m way back in the bush way back. Now I take pics show them to a bunch if educated couch potatoes at?work. They laugh lol lol lol..I told them look at me I ain’t laughing. Now 4 of the 5 never spent one day hunting or guiding like me. At 2 am when I’m tracking wounded gut shot deer somewhere in North America they were in bed watching leno. How in the heck can someone who does not know the woods tell me a living thing on 2 feet did not make them tracks? Now one guy a hunter from oregan does believe in bf. Now I know something is out there , what that is I don’t know. I do know this you can put all the PHD and Dr in one room and many don’t have an ounce of common sense other than what they read in a book. I know what I saw and it was tracks of no man. People this thing is REAL.

  5. joe r

    Brad, now that’s funny, great point.
    Doug, i feel ur frustration, i have also spent my life in the woods. I started hunting ducks and deer at age 12 and am now 52. I live in the middle of the Pine Barrens in southern N.J. and in 30 plus years i have seen 1 set of definitive tracks with toes. They were 13 inches long and roughly 6 inches wide, i found them in January in sugar sand by a pond. I was miles from anything, i have never seen a squatch but i have enough common sense to know a person didnt make them. It is very frustrating to hear these scientists come to these ridiculous conclusions without ever setting one foot in the woods. I believe most of what they tell the general public comes from the gov’t telling them what they can say.

  7. Amy H

    There are a few kinds of Biological Ph.D’s. Also remember, Ph.Ds are 1% of the 33% of the population who go to college. Think of the number of NFL players out of the many who play football (very few). Now you get the idea of how many Ph.d’s there are. Of those, how many are biologists? How many of those biologists are field biologists? How many actually spent their Ph.D research years out in the field? That number is striking small. An actual field Ph.D., biologist won’t refute what people are seeing in the field. They’ll use it. They are skeptical and should be.
    I live with a Ph.D field biologist. He hunts, hikes, has spent more time in remote places doing research then imaginable. He’s job is being out in the field daily conducting research on animals and fish. He’s skeptical but open-minded.
    Good Ph.D., researchers are out there they just can’t be easily found.

Leave a Reply