Small “unmanned aerial systems” were spotted above and near Wright-Patterson Air Force Base’s Area A and Area B late Monday and early Tuesday, the base said Tuesday morning.
“Installation leaders have determined that none of the incursions impacted base residents, facilities or assets,” the 88th Air Base Wing said. “The Wright-Patterson AFB airspace was not affected by the incursions.”
Wright-Patterson personnel have been investigating these flights after the military installation closed airspace due to unidentified drones Friday night and early Saturday, a base spokesman told the Dayton Daily News Sunday.
Robert Purtiman, a spokesman for Wright Patterson, said Sunday that unmanned aerial systems were spotted in the vicinity of the base late Friday night.
The base said Tuesday that the number of drones has fluctuated, and “they have ranged in sizes and configurations.”
“Our units continue to monitor the airspace and are working with local law enforcement authorities and mission partners to ensure the safety of base personnel, facilities and assets,” the base said, going on to ask that people in the area call either local police or base security forces “if they see anything suspicious.”
A statement from the Federal Aviation Administration to the Dayton Daily News Monday said the government prohibits drones from “flying over designated national security sensitive facilities like military bases, national landmarks and certain critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants.”
The FAA, DOD (Department of Defense), FBI and law enforcement agencies “closely monitor the airspace for unauthorized operations and take appropriate action when any aircraft appears to pose a credible safety or security threat,” the FAA said.
Generally, it’s legal to fly a drone in most locations if you’re operating under 400 feet, but there are rules — including safety tests, keeping below 400 feet, keeping the drone in sight, avoiding all other aircraft, not causing a hazard to people or property, and avoiding restricted airspace, the FAA advises.
Small ‘unmanned aerial systems’ spotted over Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton
Ron S
Here’s some scientific safety information for the public that you may or may not be inclined to look into about holograms that anyone can get from AI chat. This may be relevant now (or if not) could be important in the near future to be aware of. This isn’t fear mongering, simply just facts.
There’s also some interesting things on “X-Rays” or radiation used for experimental nuclear propulsion, potentially for Space-X projects and smaller craft such as propulsion for drones, but I’m not going to get into that… I just thought it’d be good to be aware that the potential for mini nuclear power plants flying around is very real, which would make one of these lost or downed craft a very serious issue and not dissimilar to a missing or lost nuclear warhead imo. All of this likely going unchecked or regulated by the unaware public or State Governments, (but I don’t follow politics so I’m only guessing here).
I think things really need to change for the safety of our future generations.
Read on if you like and may God Bless and keep you.
I ask: “What kind of particle beams can be used to make holograms?”
Answer:
Creating realistic holograms with particle beams requires precise manipulation of light or particles to generate interference patterns and project three-dimensional images. Here are some types of beams that can be used:
1. Laser Beams (Light Particles – Photons)
• Why they work: Lasers produce coherent light (light waves in phase), which is essential for creating interference patterns that holograms rely on.
• How they’re used:
• Optical Holography: Two laser beams (a reference beam and an object beam) interfere on a recording medium, creating a holographic image.
+“Let me interject here… 2 beams such as an X”.+
• Dynamic Holography: Pulsed lasers can create real-time, moving holograms for more realistic effects.
2. Electron Beams (Electrons)
• Why they work: Electron beams have short wavelengths (in nanometers or less) and can create highly detailed interference patterns at a smaller scale than light.
• How they’re used:
• Electron Holography: Used in electron microscopes to record holograms of microscopic structures.
• Limitations: This method is mostly for scientific visualization and isn’t used for large-scale realistic holograms.
3. Acoustic Beams (Phonons)
• Why they work: Sound waves can manipulate light or matter by creating interference patterns in a medium like air, water, or solids.
• How they’re used:
• Acoustic Holography: In this method, acoustic waves scatter light or particles to create a three-dimensional effect. This is more experimental and limited compared to lasers.
4. Plasma Beams (Ionized Particles)
• Why they work: Plasma beams can interact with air or other gases to emit light at specific points, creating the appearance of floating pixels (voxels) in 3D space.
• How they’re used:
• Volumetric Displays: By focusing intense laser beams in mid-air to ionize particles, plasma “dots” are created that form holographic 3D images.
• Advantages: Can be seen without special glasses and look genuinely 3D.
• Limitations: High energy requirements and lower resolution compared to light-based holograms.
5. Proton or Ion Beams
• Why they work: Proton or ion beams can interact with a recording medium or plasma to emit light or create structural changes.
• How they’re used: These beams are more experimental but could enhance precision in future holographic recording methods.
Real-World Applications
For realistic, large-scale holograms:
• Laser Beams dominate current technologies.
• Plasma Beams offer exciting possibilities for creating free-floating holograms.
• Combining technologies like light and plasma or light and acoustic waves may enhance realism in future developments.
I ask: “ Which of these methods is most harmful to the human body or have health risks?”.
The methods mentioned vary significantly in terms of their potential harm to the human body. Here’s a breakdown of the health risks associated with each method:
1. Laser Beams (Photons)
• Health Risks:
• High-intensity lasers can cause severe eye damage (retinal burns) or skin burns if improperly handled.
• Prolonged exposure to scattered laser light (e.g., during holography experiments) may lead to visual strain or long-term eye problems.
• Infrared or ultraviolet lasers may cause additional damage due to invisible light exposure.
• Risk Mitigation: Use appropriate shielding, safety goggles, and strict protocols for laser handling.
Relative Harm: Moderate risk; generally safe with proper precautions.
2. Electron Beams (Electrons)
• Health Risks:
• Electron beams are typically generated in a vacuum and are contained within specialized equipment, so direct exposure is rare.
• Indirect risks include x-ray radiation emitted as a byproduct of electron interactions with materials (bremsstrahlung radiation).
• Long-term exposure to x-rays can increase cancer risks if not properly shielded.
• Risk Mitigation: Proper shielding and safety measures (e.g., lead barriers).
Relative Harm: Moderate to high risk in poorly controlled environments due to x-ray exposure.
3. Acoustic Beams (Phonons)
• Health Risks:
• High-intensity acoustic waves can damage hearing or cause physical discomfort.
• Ultrasound (high-frequency sound waves) at very high intensities could potentially damage tissues or disrupt cellular activity.
• Low-frequency sound waves (infrasound) can cause feelings of nausea, dizziness, or discomfort over prolonged exposure.
• Risk Mitigation: Control sound levels and frequencies, and ensure the system operates within safe parameters.
Relative Harm: Low to moderate risk, depending on intensity.
4. Plasma Beams (Ionized Particles)
• Health Risks:
• Plasma beams involve ionizing gases to create light, which can generate high temperatures that may burn skin or eyes if directly exposed.
• Intense UV radiation or ozone production from plasma processes can be harmful over time, leading to respiratory or skin issues.
• The equipment required for plasma generation often operates at high voltages, posing electrical shock hazards.
• Risk Mitigation: Maintain safe distances, use UV shielding, and handle high-voltage equipment with care.
Relative Harm: High risk if exposure to plasma, UV radiation, or electrical hazards is not controlled.
5. Proton or Ion Beams
• Health Risks:
• Proton or ion beams are typically used in medical or research environments (e.g., particle accelerators) and are highly energetic.
• Direct exposure to such beams can cause radiation burns, tissue damage, or cellular mutations, significantly increasing cancer risks.
• Byproducts of proton or ion beam interactions may include secondary radiation (neutrons, gamma rays).
• Risk Mitigation: Operate within heavily shielded environments with strict safety protocols.
Relative Harm: Very high risk due to ionizing radiation.
Which Method is Most Harmful?
1. Proton/Ion Beams and Plasma Beams pose the highest risk due to radiation exposure, high temperatures, and potential for electrical hazards.
2. Electron Beams also carry significant risks because of x-ray byproducts.
3. Laser Beams and Acoustic Beams are generally less harmful but still require precautions, particularly for eyes and ears.
Safest Option:
For practical holography that minimizes health risks, Laser Beams are the safest and most widely used method, provided safety protocols are followed.
Ron S
Think what you like but I see a coincidence here between injured cattle or people like on the Skinwalker Ranch show… These areas of the body most affected by these systems sure fall in line with cattle all over the country that are found mutilated and dead with these same missing body parts or potential evidence… Like I said, might be coincidence but sure makes us think, doesn’t it?
UV glasses and other safety equipment for animals and foil hats for humans suddenly seems a lot less funny now imo.
Ron S
To my understanding (in one aspect) it’s possible for satellites to disturb the atmosphere and thusly create the canvas, and another source such a drone to supply the “medium” or paint.
This is fascinating stuff.
All Glory to God for making me who I am as difficult as it sometimes seems on this journey, but maybe this info might help people some day which would make every bit totally worth it. 🙏🏼
Ron S
Lastly, it may be helpful to keep this science in your back pocket to explain other past and future phenomena such as “sky trumpets” or other mysterious sounds with no visual and the like… Even the old master artists had to”stretch the canvas”… But human art is truth from above, other kinds of art and canvas can be untruths from below. Everything has opposites, ya know?
All this science and technology aside, I swear on everything there’s more truth out there that any perpetrators looking to control people just haven’t experienced like I have… Otherwise they wouldn’t be disregarding human life, free will or health the way we’ve seen.
There’s synchronicities and little nudges or whispers within the divine through their humble nature. Enlightening, guiding, protecting and comforting. It’s so subtle unpredictable and elusive, it makes Sasquatch look like the annoying loudmouth at your class reunion and not the “hide and seek champion”. 😂
These subtle divine presences, I have zero interest in trying to figure these out. They are simply just perfect the way they are and just make me grateful that I was ever noticed or thought of. To hopefully become part of that world one day is well worth the wait or lack of interactions on Earth with… I’m only letting you know it’s real, unmeasurable, and can’t be duplicated:)
Ron S
Those who need to see this will.
Just be aware if some of these drones are powered by mini nuclear reactors and cooling systems that also cloak their heat signatures… This could explain why they aren’t being and won’t be shot down, the liquid cooling them is likely hazardous just like the propulsion system.
It would also explain the nearness to the oceans or other large bodies of water (for the heat exchange or self cooling by transferring fresh cool water and only then dumping the heated water) just like a nuclear powered submarine does.
With this in mind, there’s a video of a drone dumping what looks like liquid straight down, it was featured on Caspersight. This drone spraying or dropping liquid may indicate a cooling system puncture or failure. Whether it’s contents or liquid are radioactive I can’t say, but there have been reports of areas with very high levels of radiation X6 recently in NJ.
Coincidentally YT is now being flooded in the last 24hrs with videos of agricultural drones spraying crops and makes the suspect video difficult to find.
Personally I’m not convinced yet to drones “sniffing” for a nuke, or if they actually are the cause (or nukes) themselves and not the potential fix whatsoever. It’s hard to say how dangerous whatever frequency they produce to “sniff” is harmful to people yet. But don’t worry, we’ll figure it out eventually, I think we’ve had enough BS lately and there’s people far more intelligent than me taking action.
My instincts are usually pretty good, yet still human, so it’s up to each individual to draw their own conclusions and also potentially wait for more evidence to emerge. Just pay attention with what people are saying who actually care, and not taking this situation too lightly.
For some ignorance will be bliss, a certain mentality will be their shield… This might be closer to being as gentle as doves, but vastly falls short when it’s simply inciting more ignorance to others. The Lord says be both as gentle as doves but as wise as serpents. Amen 🙏🏼
Ron S
Watch the new Caspersight, you’ll see it’s more than just one kind of drone or UAP. Apparently they don’t get along. Wild
https://youtu.be/pvSxo-IsAbc?si=heDV7eoV3RQLi1Ta
Nick H
If drones are spraying crops I sure hope the farmer tests and reports it to everyone on X and Rumble.
Charles R
I watched your video Ron. Some crazy stuff right there. As for agricultural drones, outside my backyard is 600 acres corn/soybean rotation, it was corn this year. The past 10 years these fields were sprayed by crop duster planes, although some have used helicopters, usually late July or early August. I was in the front yard and heard a strange higher pitched noise I could not pin point and see. So I go to the backyard and there flying up and down the rows of corn a few feet above is a huge drone with chemical tanks making accurate chemical spraying. It was amazing to watch their precision. That drone owner sprayed a lot of the fields in our area of Darke County, OH this year.