@tulkas
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
In the above GIF I see 7 potential heads of creatures. Are there 7 creatures in this photo, no idea. If you look at some of Scott Carpenter’s evidence he has caught on a backwards facing camera, the heads look similar but a bit closer and clearer. If you have seen CryptoReality’s pictures the heads look very similar, so this labs us with the issue how to get better evidence I think using HD pics with GIF formatting and multiple persist is one way. Just how actually to get this done is the question needs to be answered.
I always see faces in videos and still shots. I always assumed that they were either a pixelization/matrixing from compressing the video and uploading to the internet, and/or pareidolia. If you have high definition pictures that you are still seeing faces in, the question is are you actually seeing something that is there. One way to make sure is to some how take pictires of am area worth focal length. For example set your standard camera to take the pictures as you always do. Then take another camera pointed at the same spot but zoomed in a bit more and take pictures simultaneously. No different then when you are capturing video and you think you see something off in the distance so you zoom in to get a better picture. With a little bit of playing around you could set up a simple system to do this. Who knows maybe thete is something out there that does this automatically. In the past when I have come across this same issue as seeing faces or bodies in a still shot on how would I corroborate what I am seeing. The GIF is a good start but I think you have to get multiple perspectives on the same image to really see if something is there. I don’t know if the technology is out there to have one camera take a picture with enough depth of field that you could zoom in and out similar to looking at a satellite image on Google maps/earth. Good idea worth the GIF.
Just a few points. 1) What is wrong with wanting to seem a few books and earn some money. He seems sincere enough. I h Abe read two of David Paulides books and I think he is on to something.
2) I think we need a lot more data before we judge the bigfoot related cases he uncovers as being predation. If that where the case then what about the children that were found alive and in relatively good health and well fed. It seems like they are being taken for some otber reason. If it were all about food these those Pele found slice after days in the wilderness would have been eaten. Even bodies that were recovered were not eaten upon. It seems like they tale them for awhile them try to return them and in some cases they are found alive in others they ate died of exposure. I believe that the practice of stealing another tribes children was to add to your family/tribe’s strength is well documented in many cultures from around the world. Let’s not just jump to conclusions wham we don’t really know the real truth of the matter. D.P. states as the reason he won’t say what is happening Newhouse he knows the data doesn’t support a simple explain line predation. I am sure some of the cases are predation but for what reason. Hopefully we will solve the mystery. The only way to do that is to look at all the data so thanks to D.P. for continuing to collect it and if he makes a good living doing it them I give him codos.I was taught to walk on the balls of my feet not allowing the heel down until I needed to give myself a rest. It is hard at first but once you get used to it you produce a lot less noise. Hard to do if you are wearing stiff boots or shoes.
I would say that it has to do with the perception of the situation. I would say that with a Grizzly most people are scared of the danger it embodies being attacked and eaten but that we perceive that we are more intelligent and that we can out think it and be able to get ourselves out of the situation mainly because we can out think it, so we have a chance of getting away. With the sasquatch I think the perception that of not only something that is physically dangerous but that has intelligent ups the fear to a higher level. In high stress situations our bodies are designed to speed up to help us get out of situations. That is went the perception of time seeming to slow down happens. In those situations your mind is quickly assessing all possible solutions to getting out of said situation with ad little harm to one’s own self. With a Grizzly you think maybe climbing a tree or getting in the car but with sasquatch the mind can not come up with a possible escape plan and therefore it gets sick and the finality of the situation sys in. You can seed this happen with someone who has an abnormal fear of something that most of us don’t have. An example of this is someone who has a deathly fear of spiders, if I am standing in a corner and you put a big spider in front of myself I would just step on it and kill it or walk away from it. Now you put someone who has an extreme fear of spiders in the same situation and they will back themselves into the corner and completely break down. Even though they could get away just by jumping over the spider their mind can’t get there because of the fear mechanism in them. I think this same process is triggered when meeting a sasquatch. Your mind can not come to grips with how are you getting out of this situation and therefore begins to shut down.
