@rmahin41-2
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I’m with ya larry. And i am so tired of the “no video evidence will be good enough.” That is hog wash. Dynamic footage of one interacting with its enviornment, (i.e. digging, climbing, eating, hunting, calling, etc.) would absolutely prove it.
those fellas down in tx would certainly qualify. The only evidence they have released was an obvious butterfly on the camera
lets keep our eyes on the ball. Totally fake pictures. We have proven that collectively. That does raise the question: this is a picture apparently supplied to wes from one of his trustworthy sources from the border patrol. I am speculating it is the gentlemen he had on the show, but have nothing to base that on. So the question is this: is wes’s source being duped by coworkers? Is wes being duped by his source? Or are we being duped?
mike f, being critical of anything that this site puts out is an automatic pass to upset people, even if you are doing it in a non aggressive, critical thinking kind of way. Don’t sweat it. Seemed like he was being condescending and calling you an arm chair qb to me, but if im wrong i apologize.
Mike f,
Good on you for actually taking a critical eye to every situation, as opposed to blindly accepting every piece of content that this web site puts out.
gum,
I know you are a moderator, but You are full of it on this. Mike f very simply put a side by side comparison, that happens to be an exact match, of the suit in question next to the image in question. It shatters what you want to believe, so you get upset and personally attack him. That is bs. Mike f did something to actually figure out the truth, and you demonize him for it. Pathetic.
.
.
.
.
MOD NOTE; Gum is not a moderator, and you need to couch your comments more carefully. Don’t call people full of it and pathetic. You don’t know that he was responding to Mikel’s photo comparison or his comments.fake. that is as fake as fake gets. the guy shot a bank shot. Even here in Indiana Sasquatch doesn’t know how to hoop, so he definitely can’t hit a basket in TX.
I’m all for putting these things under the light and putting them through the paces, but imo this one seems to fall on the “normal behavior” side of things. I could be wrong, just my 2 cents. But i always enjoy going through missing person cases, i love a good who done it.
I am a big big fan of pualides and his books. And i actually watched this episode live. I think you guys are reading a little too far into the moose tracks. What the officers were saying, was that because a moose has a “lazy” stride, it drags its hooves in between steps, which at first glance, can make them look similar to human tracks, and it was slowing them down because they would start to investigate all these track lines before they realized it was moose.
As far as the scent, or lack thereof that the dog was getting; my guess is that the criminal had been waiting in that specific spot where the dog came into play because it was right next to the road, and he was waiting on a ride. The dogs apparent confusion was probably because he was catching the scent, but it never went in any direction, because the guy jumped in a car. That wouldn’t account for the route the crook took to get there, but i assume the handler would deter the dog from back tracking the way the deputy already came in from.
It should also be noted that the suspect was captured about a week later if my memory serves me correctly.
about ten pounds of hamburger meat in a few different locations around the property filled with sinai poison should do the trick. She should arm herself with an ak47 with a lot of ammo just in case they get mad.
I don’t see how the type of light could effect anything. Even if an animal has the ability to see ir light, he’d have to get his picture taken in order for the light to turn on, so that really debunks that theory in my mind. I think its just percentages. Such a tiny tiny portion of wilderness is covered by trail cams, it would be a near miracle to catch a sasquatch on one. The smell of the cameras could come into play as well.
I was surprised by your description of “jenny’s” response until i referenced the original thread. I have run across that type of thing several times on this forum. If you even moderately suggest that anyone that has been a guest or posted on the forum is streching the truth or outright lying, you get completely villified. There is no room on this forum for rational discussion about peoples motives. It is to be assumed that everyone has terrible PTSD and are above any questioning whatsoever.
I’m with you john.
