Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 28, 2022 at 6:31 am #213005
Ron B
ParticipantRecommendations for BF guns:
If trained (and legal), always carry…
1) Handgun & Holster: The largest caliber with the most rounds you are confident with–best fits your hand and one you handle well–a small hit is better than a big miss. (Yes, Randy Garrett does make some good hard n heavy rounds but in limited calibers–see Buffalo Bore Ammo as well for additional calibers–note: bullet weight trumps speed, both is even better).
As a primary weapon up close…
2) Consider a 12 gauge shotgun w/ an extended magazine tube and with Brenneke KO 1 oz slugs or greater size (the 2 3/4 can easily be handled by most and are overall comparable to the 45-70 setups recommended above, which are very good too, but most overlook the 12 gauge). This is something most anyone can learn to handle, get cheap practice ammo, and it offers low to high end budget options. Many quality reliable 30 caliber or greater 20+ round magazine fed rifles are a good primary choice as well.
As for hunting from a fixed location…
3) A full size 30 caliber rifle (.308, 30-06 or greater–not a carbine round 30-30 etc) is minimum, plus friends to back you up with “2)’s”. This is where the 20mm may come in handy, ha!
July 4, 2022 at 5:34 pm #212027Ron B
ParticipantHa! No, that is certainly not the footage I was referring too nor the camera angle. The one I spoke off even shows the cockpit and windshield as good as it was sitting on a runway before takeoff emerging out the other side of the building… The film I am referring to was a huge CGI error by the maker, even for the vintage technology available at the time it was made (arrogance?).
The film I speak of was more like a Looney Tunes Roadrunner vs Wilie Coyote pre-created error, like the later pics or views of the cheesy black cut outs at the impact site(s) made in a semi-shape of an aircraft and wing (actually likely made by likely explosive charges pre-set to make this shape–I suspect this may be what initially caught the 1,000 + Engineers and Architects to place their reputations and careers on the line and say “NO WAY !” against MSM and the 911 BS report), yet shown as if LIVE on TV during the hit–the reason it was quickly scrubbed after the error was noticed after televising it so-called LIVE.
I suspect if you search hard enough someone has the footage available–there will be no doubt if/when you find it (it is quite comical). But now to me it appears it may not mean much to most folks nowadays anyway if they do see it. And I understand this, is way too much for most to consider. So it may be best to no longer research this topic or any similar for most that have their minds made up?
Plus for the towers, unless folks realize how well made these towers were constructed it may not have an impact. And, just like car crashes, planes do no disappear upon impact when they crash–they leave physical evidence consistent with that which crashed, etc., and the aluminum and fiberglass they have does not have special impact penetrating qualities at high speeds–in fact the films of the impacts show speeds of over 550 mph which Engineers and Architects claim are beyond the structural integrity of the aircraft claimed to those hitting the towers (There is worldwide history of plane crashes and they always leave substantial physical evidence at the impact sight even when full of fuel or hitting a basic non-hardened skyscraper…)
So, please do not take my word or anyone’s word for any of this, research it yourself if you think it important, or ignore it if you already have your mind made up regardless of the evidence you think you may find or if you think it may be more than you can handle if…
But if you seek truth no matter what and view this as a potential iconic historical event as I do, then review the video I posted above with an open objective as possible mind and seek truth here and elsewhere, including Sasquatch reports and alike. Either way I will accept you, your experiences, and beliefs as what you believe.
God Bless!
July 3, 2022 at 4:08 pm #211985Ron B
ParticipantJohn A, I meant no disrespect to you, nor am I questioning any of your experiences.
I was questioning how it is that a hollow thin gauge aluminum aircraft with a fiberglass nose cone can penetrate a hardened concrete and steel structure exterior, then is able to continue and pass through the extra reinforced hardened concrete and steel interior core, and then exit through the other side hardened concrete and steel structure exterior, all while maintaining the integrity of the fiberglass nose cone in perfect shape as it emerges out the other side.
July 2, 2022 at 4:15 pm #211936Ron B
ParticipantThis video below, with 5 million plus views, has likely been viewed by many of you. It is something we all may want to keep in mind when considering we are all bombarded with ongoing deception no matter how in tuned with reality (real truth) we believe we stand firm upon. We are all deceived at times to various degrees for a number of reasons, self included (I admit I can be wrong no doubt).
The information in this video below may help each of us remain objective when evaluating physical evidence and witness testimony as it relates to topics considered, be it conspiracy cover-ups, Sasquatch or cryptid encounters, etc., including our own experiences.
I suspect most here have had experiences that go beyond or are outside and even contradict the official main stream Sasquatch narrative… And those here typically have way more open minds than the masses typically are even capable of having. I joined to learn more from you all, and probably selfishly I take listen or read rather than share, but felt compelled to add this and maybe help someone out on a similar investigative trail as mine…
But just as some above have indicated or warned the deceptions can even go both ways, and we should remain aware and scrutinize everything we are fed and not come to any conclusions without thorough examination of the physical evidence and witness testimony presented by use of logic and reason, and not just rely upon so called expert testimony (main stream BS science) yet that ought be evaluated as well just in case it has merit too.
As for me… No matter how powerful your cannon may be, there is no way you can send a 12oz aluminum soda pop can through the Great Wall of China, plus have the can tip come through the other side in perfect shape and form and leave zero to no evidence other than a fire ball of destruction beyond measure in its wake! (not sure if that early released 911 news footage can still be found on the Internet, but if you find it, it’s gold!) WOW!
Most of the good evidence, that contradicts the BS false flags in the US or the catalyst in support of BS legislation, is scrubbed from the internet, so folks may want to research topics often to get re-posts, Also as for the 911 incident please research the thousands of Engineers and Architects out spoken against the 911 narrative, some may be re-posted briefly now and then.
I have not researched the Texas gig, but WOW on the 911, Sandy Hook, and Boston scenarios (if you only have time to dig into one start at Sandy Hook–they really messed up on this one, maybe more than all others combined–the arrogance is over the top…). Please keep an open mind and know that physical evidence always trumps witness testimony, especially when the witness has credibility issues and or plays multiple characters in an alleged false flag event or is a paid actor by trade, etc. If none of this is of interest to you or is too much for you to consider, then please stay away, and look no further because you may not like what you find…
July 1, 2022 at 3:53 pm #211897Ron B
ParticipantThanks John A; I won’t ask further… I’m glad you weren’t injured.
July 1, 2022 at 11:08 am #211878Ron B
ParticipantJohn A, which plane did you see crash?
May 24, 2022 at 12:02 pm #209586Ron B
ParticipantScott Carpenter’s theory…
May 3, 2022 at 3:34 pm #208607Ron B
ParticipantMy theory…
Sasquatch may be any one of the following 3 entities:
1) The most common, Sasquatch originates from fallen angels breeding with women and or animals as far back as 6,000 years ago and or the time of Noah. These offspring bred with other offspring and or animals (or fallen angels), creating numerous variations of hybrids resulting in giants and numerous other forms of large and small cryptids. When these flesh and blood creatures physically die, their demon spirit remains, seeking flesh and blood as a new host. I suspect these demons may often join another cryptid host, specifically kin near by–so many Sasquatch or cryptids may carry numerous demons (some of which are able to perform mind speak and related experiences).
2) The same result as “1)”, but rather than being created through breeding, created in a lab by either fallen angel(s), their hybrid offspring, or humans.
3) Fallen Angels taking temporary form of a Sasquatch for various reasons (protecting their offspring/Sasquatch, evil, etc). This would explain some of the extreme experiences some folks experience that does not add up when it comes to mere flesh and blood and or demonic activity alone.
Again, just my theory…
April 28, 2022 at 3:08 pm #208403Ron B
ParticipantThank you gentlemen! Steven B, the stories you linked are the kind I seek! If anyone else has a related story please share too; there is not much out there, but I know folks have seen such creatures.
March 30, 2022 at 7:41 pm #207248Ron B
ParticipantYou may want to check out the area North of Upper Priest Lake. The North side of Lion’s Head in the Spring is good and few go there this early. Be careful, there is little to no cell service back there. The grizzlies tend to run away, but the Mountain Lions may size you up, even in the day… Please don’t trust any of them.
You may find foot tracks and abnormally large feces… Stay alert, some foot tracks may not necessarily be Sasquatch (they may be something larger, IDK). I use to go there but not anymore.
-
AuthorPosts