@lizzy196605hotmail-com
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Thanks to both for your replies. Wes has absolutely provided me with that safe harbor. You’re right, I didn’t provide references, I don’t want to come across as a cry baby.Not my thing. And I’m not keeping score of all of the negative vs thumbs up remarks. In my particular case, suggesting that me, the story teller had the issue and not the EX, I’m a survivor of mental hell, because of the Ex. I’m thinking that as members we should have better decorum. Thanks for the insight. Wondering, if you have a story on file with Wes? Would you care to direct me to it? I’m starting all over again, it’s amazing all that ya miss the first time.
Juwondering what the member’s Rules of Engagement are? Do we act as a governing body over guest speakers, who next to be voted off the island? Are we obligated to weigh in on the truth to a guest’s experience-their own personal story? If this is Wes’s brain child, a fantastic podcast creation, a place where people across the world come to for a safe space to tell Wes their story. To decompress, to gain insight and direction from Wes. How is it that members get to dissect a guest’s encounter to the point where if that guest knew what was happening behind the scenes, the message it would send to them would be directly opposite of Wes professes his site to be? I underste to be. Who gave the members a badge allowing them to vote [per se] whether someone’s encounter is bullshit or not? We are not experts-no such thing as a Sasquatch expert. The other point to all of this is, some comments from some of the members cross the line. We can never know the full entire detailed life of any guest, so for the members that comment to the point of ridicule and insult is unconscionable. Just wondering how and why so much power has been given to member’s voices? Should this platform be about what’s perceived to be believable or not per the opinions of the members? Are we suppose to be acting as bullshit detectors? I don’t live for up votes, everyone has an asshole and an opinion, however when critiquing someone’s life event, it would behoove the audience, made up of members, to pause their mouths before slinging words at another person’s world. For they don’t know that the guest speaker is a survivor 👌 I’m looking for clarity,for rules. I’m thankful to be . I’m hoping that personal attacks shouldn’t be allowed
nor tolerated. Thanks for the replies!
