@doug17
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
It could be depression/suicide.
She was suffering from a thyroid condition and was unhappy about it’s treatment.
A quick check of Google shows that in the vast majority of cases hyper thyroidism isn’t fatal.
So maybe she was depressed.
Yet she was an active film maker and activist, the antithesis of the typical depressed person.Who knows?
“But he’s “worried sick” Roscovich may have gone off into the bush to do a wilderness retreat or spirit fast and gotten into trouble.
“If she’s gone off and done it alone, things can go sideways. There’s cougars around. One potentially saving factor is that she’s spent a lot of time in the woods. She’s one of the bravest women I know,” he told CBC Thursday morning.
Roscovich’s green Volvo station wagon was found Wednesday in Campbell River near the Quadra Island ferry, so people are searching there today.
Andree says Roscovich had been struggling with health issues and “upset” the last time they spoke.”
Sounds like a missing 411 case.
Photo of her car.
Parked across two parking spots
https://i.cbc.ca/1.4289534.1505434133!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_940/twyla-s-green-volvo.jpg“CAMPBELL RIVER, Canada — Police say a search is underway for a 37-year-old Vancouver Island woman who has been missing for about a week.
Port McNeil RCMP say Twyla Roscovich was reported missing on Sept. 12.
She reportedly left her home in Port McNeill, B.C., for medical treatment on Sept. 6 and was last confirmed to be in the Campbell River or Quadra Island area on Sept. 7 and 8.
Police say she sent a text message saying she would be camping near Nanaimo in her car, but her family has posted on Facebook that the vehicle has been found while the woman remains missing.”
The medical treatment was for her thyroid, so not necessarily an immediate medical threat. She had a husband, can career and a child, so perhaps not suicidal.
She was camping and she went missing.
RCMP say there was no foul play.So what killed her?
As I recall, they spent time with two hucksters who claimed to have filmed a Bigfoot, but it was just a pile of brush with circles on the photo showing where the Bigfoot was supposed to be.
One witness was giddy and waved his hands a lot and the other guy looked and sounded like a local thug.
None too convincing.Those chicken coops are sold as kits.
They aren’t very big.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SbkfTE7478o
It should give scale to the supposed creature.
A follow up on SNOPES
“information?
Snopes is now 50% owned by an ad agency (Proper Media) and they make money by generating millions of views on the 3rd-party advertisements on their website. It simply makes sense for them to seek out articles that are viral to “debunk”, so that they can piggy-back on that traffic and generate more advertising revenue.
Snopes was founded by a husband and wife team who are now in the middle of a contentious divorce in which founder David Mikkelsen has been accused of embezzling $98,000 of company money to spend on “himself and prostitutes”.
Snopes now has a hired team of suspect fact checkers who collaborate to debunk falsehoods that are trending on the internet.
These fact checkers reportedly have no editorial oversight and do not follow standard journalistic procedures such as interviewing the authors of articles they are trying to debunk to get all sides of the story.
Snopes doesn’t have a formal screening process for hiring fact checkers and for evaluating applicants for any potential conflicts of interest. Without such standards, it is very easy for them to be infiltrated by those who work with the industry and who have a hidden agenda.”As a further tid bit, the founder, David Mikkelson recently married porn star Erin O’Bryn, aka Elyssa Young.
Thinkerthunker did 2 bids looking at this:
Looks like it may have been a mother and child encounter.
Thinker Thinker liked his videos.
I think it’s real or excellent fakes.
Way more convincing than fraud standing.
That both timbergiant and thinkerthunker quit is also interesting.
It could be that having reached a certain point, there is nothing left but to kill one of these creatures.
Maybe their conscience has given them pause.I really like that he has the balls to do this unarmed.
After having listened to most of the SC shows, most stories would have shot at the suspected Bigfoot long before timbergiant even got close.Lyle Blackburn’s book “Beyond Boggy Creek” has several stories from early Texas where wild men were chased by men on horseback.
In one story, a female Bigfoot was chased with a lariat.
It dropped a club and escaped in the evening dark.The city of Round Rock is using a clip from a Russian Bigfoot sighting as their own.
Here’s the news story with the supposed Round Rock clip –
Now here’s the original Russian sighting –
Since someone on YouTube claims copyright, does that mean the FBI is lending “credibility” to a case of copyright infringement?
This little boy is damaged….
But ’twas all in good fun!
One has to wonder about the FBI component in this.
Is it a bureau attempt to soften their image after it was revealed that FBI Director James Coney was a lying sack of **** who conspired with foreigners to unseat a duly elected President?Or is it just real bad judgement.?
Fake FBI Most Wanted poster –
http://www.twcnews.com/tx/austin/news/2017/06/23/fbi-bigfoot-round-rock.html
http://www.twcnews.com/content/dam/News/static/Embedded%20Images/Texas/ROUND_ROCK_BIGFOOT.jpg
Doesn’t this remind anyone of the first “Jaws” movie?
“The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers”
“In the counter-intelligence world, this is what is known as a “wilderness of mirrors” – creating a chaotic information environment that so perfectly blends truth, half-truth and fiction that even the best can no longer tell what’s real and what’s not.
Thus, when I reached out to David Mikkelson, the founder of Snopes, for comment, I fully expected him to respond with a lengthy email in Snopes’ trademark point-by-point format, fully refuting each and every one of the claims in the Daily Mail’s article and writing the entire article off as “fake news.”
It was with incredible surprise therefore that I received David’s one-sentence response which read in its entirety “I’d be happy to speak with you, but I can only address some aspects in general because I’m precluded by the terms of a binding settlement agreement from discussing details of my divorce.”
This absolutely astounded me. Here was the one of the world’s most respected fact checking organizations, soon to be an ultimate arbitrator of “truth” on Facebook, saying that it cannot respond to a fact checking request because of a secrecy agreement.
In short, when someone attempted to fact check the fact checker, the response was the equivalent of “it’s secret.”
It is impossible to understate how antithetical this is to the fact checking world, in which absolute openness and transparency are necessary prerequisites for trust. How can fact checking organizations like Snopes expect the public to place trust in them if when they themselves are called into question, their response is that they can’t respond.”
Tracy A:
I don’t hate wolves.
I’ll say that outright, but I went to your link and then to the other link, this one:It gives a sample of a hoax.
Here is the photo:
http://www.thewildlifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/phoney-big-wolf.jpgAnd the caption says:
“A good example of wolf fraud photography. No it isn’t photoshopped. It is just that the camera is closer to the wolf than the man, and wolves also have very long legs.”
I’m sorry, but the article isn’t convincing me.
It doesn’t break down the fraud, just that it was “debunked” by Snopes:“Snopes.com, a site dedicated to studying and potentially debunking Internet myths, has set aside a comment thread for the photo. According to commenters, the wolf has been suspected as killed in Edson, Alberta, “just east” of Yellowstone Park, in Manitoba, and near Drayson Valley, Alberta.”
Snopes, for those who may not know, is an obese American Cat woman living in an apartment in San Francisco:
http://www.realfarmacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/snopes.jpg
“David and Barbara Mikkelson are the husband-and-wife duo behind the myth-busting Web site Snopes.com. Photo by Guy Raz/NPR”Snopes is the darling of left leaning American media.
They don’t like hunters.
