Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 17, 2018 at 6:51 pm #131984
Mark B
ParticipantLol only Sean Hannity? Nobody from the other news outlets?
I think your bias is showing, just a bit.July 29, 2018 at 8:00 am #130705Mark B
Participant@Mark F. Simply put we can choose to follow a thread or move on to the next thread. It’s just that simple
February 3, 2018 at 9:33 am #118772Mark B
ParticipantScott O. Using your logic would mean everyone of these Bigfoot videos are real because, after all who would spend money on a monkey suit, Right?
You may want to rethink your comment.
You can get a monkey suit for $68.99. Or a gorilla costume for $80.40 or a Adult “professional” gorilla costume for $89.99 plus $19.99 shipping and handling. It is quite feasible this is a man in a monkey suit. FYIFebruary 2, 2018 at 7:28 pm #118719Mark B
ParticipantI would bet a years salary this is hoaxed. Nothing we know about the big guy is represented here at all, with the exception of lots of hair. The arms are too short and swing like a man. No inline gate, walks like a man. The legs have no definition and look the same as a man wearing slacks.
These guys captured the idea of Sasquatch but missed the essence of Sasquatch. Nice tryJanuary 6, 2018 at 5:35 am #116766Mark B
ParticipantYes twice
October 8, 2017 at 7:32 pm #111917Mark B
ParticipantThe commercialization of Bigfoot is a double edged sword. On one side you have folks who know nothing on the subject but an interest is created and/or another amature investigator is born. Or you have someone like me who had an incident and can easily find information to help research and figure out what kind of animal could have made that ungodly growl from 20 ft away.
Then you have the scoffers who can’t imagine anything outside their comfort zone could possibly be real. These people will jeer poke fun and laugh at ANY talk of Sasquatch, Dogman, aliens, orbs etc. A good example of this is any newscaster reporting s Bigfoot story with their tongue deeply entrenched in their cheek as they laughingly report that story.
But as with anything in life you have takers and users. Bottom line is until we have substantial proof none of it matters either way.October 8, 2017 at 6:11 pm #111916Mark B
ParticipantMark s. I know exactly what you mean. I want so badly for this guy to be legit but that thing in my gut i just can’t shake. Bottom line for me is this, if you have the type of footage not seen since Patterson/Gimlin stop trying to make a buck off it and just put it out there for us ALL to see.
September 7, 2017 at 7:30 pm #109999Mark B
ParticipantUnless she has some special anti cloaking vision she is completely delusional. Unfortunate.
August 8, 2017 at 8:26 pm #108381Mark B
ParticipantIt’s too bad we couldn’t hear the monkeys in the trees but the fishing itself was pretty damn entertaining. Thanks
July 1, 2017 at 9:49 am #106835Mark B
ParticipantDon’t quite know why he stopped filming when it started getting interesting with the dog growls. What was the dog growling at unless it was timber giant himself. I understand the difficulty in trying to locate something through the lens at a distance but DAMN it’s frustrating when he’s floating all over the place instead of on the subject itself. Good stuff though, hope he collected hairs and such. Thanks for sharing
June 11, 2017 at 5:29 pm #105779Mark B
ParticipantVery Interesting. Not only the dogs reaction but the woman’s responses to it has a ring of authenticity. Do we know where this is? I wonder if it stuck around in hopes of having a Jack Russell Christmas dinner. Good post.
April 6, 2017 at 5:26 pm #102755Mark B
ParticipantI found it. It’s under the Blog category near the beginning about the 2nd or 3rd page.
BUT it says video is no longer available. Maybe we can get Wes to re-release it.April 2, 2017 at 8:06 pm #102566Mark B
ParticipantWes basically already did this. He went ( by himself ) to the sight with a video camera and explained where what and when. This has been a couple years now. Perhaps somebody out there knows how far back you would need to go to find it. I admire him for doing that because it was obviously difficult for him to return to the scene of the crime. ( by himself )
March 25, 2017 at 8:41 am #101960Mark B
ParticipantTHIS is a great idea. Sounds very user friendly
March 22, 2017 at 8:48 pm #101805Mark B
ParticipantI have alway had “the feeling” that this so called Blinky is Todd Standing himself. To me it looks like Standing covered in make up.
I’ve watched it over and over and in my mind I see T. Standing. And like Knobby says “where’s the rest of the clip?” A couple seconds really? -
AuthorPosts