@bflysmommy
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Wolf this is embarrassing. Every single time I peruse the forum (and its not too often anymore) you are here spewing obviously false claims, mixed with hatred and vitriol for American citizens who are in the Democratic party. WTF is wrong with you? Are you even American? I thought were Australian? How can you possibly spend so much time writing about how bad democratic citizens are and get your information so blatantly wrong? In your entry with the following time stamp: December 29, 2025 at 1:51 pm you provide a link to a web page which lists one false statement after another about the Nevada 2020 elections. There is no proof or evidence to support any of the claims. There is much evidence to the contrary and it has been presented to the courts in Nevada. That is why all of those accusations have been debunked. All of the lawsuits associated with such nonsense have been rejected.
That you simply ignore the evidence and the judicial rulings and continue to spew false narratives makes your credibility suspect. I mean I know why Trump and his minions are behaving this way. They obviously want the power. But what stake do you have in it? What could you possibly get from helping them gaslight America?
I challenge you to fact check your posts before you post them.
In fact I challenge everyone to fact check prior to posting. Wes could do some good by having mods fact check posts and eliminate the statements which don’t pass muster. And I do mean both sides of the aisle.Oh brother! That’s a hoot. Hey, remember all those people who thought this war would be over in 3 days, tops? That was wild, right, Wolf? That was insane thinking Putin was just going to waltz right in and take whatever he fancied.
It would seem Putin is a master at propaganda, but not so much in the military leader position anymore. What do you think now?Knobby: A quick search using Google’s AI (how many world-renowned doctors and scientists believe the COVID-19 vaccine causes turbo cancer?)reveals a great many more believe that correlation does not equal causation. In fact most are finding no correlation at all.
But the idea that there is no merit to the claim is just a sidenote to the bigger transgression of using Meldrum’s tribute page as a personal soapbox. And to use language like genojabbed or jabbed and stabbed is more than just unfortunate.Oddly, some people never miss an opportunity to spew ignorant and hurtful propaganda under the guise of being thoughtful and concerned individuals. Dr. Meldrum’s family could not possibly be healed (or even helped) by insinuating his death is due to being jabbed and stabbed. Wait for your own family’s death to show how classy you can be.
A simple google search pulled up a plethora of information. And yes, google’s data is superior to anecdotal rhetoric. Following is the first source that was listed.
‘Turbo Cancer’ and mRNA: The myth that defies biology and physics
Helen Petousis-Harris, BSc, PGDipSci (Dist), PhD 31 October 2024
Amidst the post-COVID vaccine world, a curious term, “Turbo Cancer,” has emerged in anti-vaccine circles. The claim? That mRNA vaccines are causing an epidemic of fast-growing, aggressive cancers. However, let’s dive into the science and show why this doesn’t hold up.Vaccines are designed to protect – not harm.
The invention that mRNA vaccines are causing an epidemic of aggressive cancers is unfounded, and cancer epidemiology provides no support for the “Turbo Cancer” narrative.
Vaccines are one of our best defences against virus-related cancers.
Next time you hear “Turbo Cancer” remember it’s a theory in search of facts, and the facts just aren’t there.
What Is “Turbo Cancer”?
“Turbo Cancer” is a term loosely thrown around by conspiracy theorists to describe supposedly aggressive and fast-developing cancers seen post-vaccination. However, it lacks a clear medical definition or evidence. The idea is more a product of anecdotal reports and maligned manipulation of people’s fear than any scientific basis.In reality, many people delayed cancer screenings and treatments during the pandemic due to healthcare disruptions. This means that cancers that would have been detected earlier are being diagnosed at more advanced stages now—giving the illusion of “faster-growing” or more aggressive cancers.
Viruses, bacteria, and cancer: The real connection
Certain viruses are well-established in causing cancer, a process known as oncogenesis. For example:Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical, oropharyngeal, and other cancers.
Hepatitis B and C viruses are linked to liver cancer.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has ties to certain lymphomas and nasopharyngeal cancer.
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection increases the risk of stomach cancer.
Even SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19, has been investigated for a possible association with cancer, though studies so far show limited evidence of direct causation. Like other viral infections, severe inflammation from SARS-CoV-2 can dysregulate the immune system, but this doesn’t mean it directly causes cancer. Vaccines, on the other hand, can reduce and prevent cancer risk by preventing viral infections (e.g., HPV and hepatitis vaccines) or treat cancer by providing personalised immunotherapy.Vaccines protect against cancer, not cause it
Vaccines are one of the most successful tools in preventing virus-related cancers. HPV vaccines, for example, have dramatically reduced the rates of cervical and other HPV-related cancers worldwide. Similarly, hepatitis vaccines reduce the risk of liver cancer by preventing chronic infections that can lead to malignancies.mRNA vaccines, like those for COVID-19, have a different mechanism. They do not contain live virus or long-lived genetic material capable of altering cellular DNA. Thus, there is no plausible mechanism by which mRNA vaccines could cause cancer.
Logic check
Vaccines of all kinds have been used for centuries and so far, none have been associated with an increase in cancer risk. No plausible mechanism proposed for this new invention, and it really lacks substance. However, let’s just fact check what is being said.According to a key proponent there are three mechanisms:
Claim 1: “mRNA in the vaccines can impair DNA repair”
Fact-check:
verified iconNope. mRNA can’t access the nucleus, end of story.Claim 2: “the Spike protein S2 segment from the vaccine but not the infection appears to inhibit the P52 and BRCA tumour suppressor systems…”
Fact-check:
verified iconmRNA vaccines have been extensively studied, with no verified link between vaccination and disruption of tumour suppressor functions in a way that increases cancer risk identified. mRNA vaccines deliver spike protein temporarily, and the components are rapidly degraded. No solid experimental evidence suggests a real impact on cancer progression in vaccinated individuals. Nor biological mechanism.Claim 3:“mRNA vaccines have process-related impurities…DNA fragments…”
Fact- check:
verified iconNope. This has been thoroughly addressed.Where is the surge of cancers?
The claim of “Turbo Cancer” suggests a rapid, unexplained surge in aggressive cancers following mass vaccination. But what does the data show?Cancer epidemiology: Numerous studies and population-wide cancer registries, including those from countries with high vaccination rates, show no significant rise in cancer incidence that correlates with COVID-19 vaccination e.g., U.S. below.
I concur, Matt. Jeff brought legitimacy to the Bigfoot world. The public is conditioned to dismiss most opinions about this subject. As a well-respected academic leader, many listened to him and believed the information he provided.
In addition, he just seemed like a well-rounded guy with a keen interest in the subject and desire to generously share his knowledge. That’s a little something special we can all keep for ourselves.
Rest in peace Jeff. You will not be forgotten.OMGoodness. I started listening at 1430. 17 minutes later he still has said NOTHING. I mean he said a lot. A lot of framing his upcoming information release. A lot of how you should feel and how you shouldn’t feel about the info…How you should dissect the info and how you shouldn’t dissect it… How little the information means and how much it all means. How other information changes peoples’ opinions and how it may not change opinions. Its too much. It was exhausting and frustrating.
Bill F I’m curious to know, specifically, what “legitimate government interests” have to lose if they confirm the existence of Sasquatch?
Wait are we surprised and/or upset that Ukraine is fighting back? I think we can all agree Russia deserves it times 1000, right? What comes around goes around. Perhaps Ukraine is just trying to return the favor and “de-nazify” specific areas of Russia. It is nice when neighbors take it upon themselves to be so helpful.
Slava Ukraini.“And while everyone was distracted with the Trump show trial, guess what?”
It is about god damn time. We should have given Ukraine that authority long ago. I know that is not what you wanted to hear, Wolf, but too bad. I said it anyway. It is the absolute truth.
Wait i thought the rule was: Make stupid statements…bring stupid receipts. Wolf If you are going to make ridiculous statements, bring your receipts. Be specific. Which historical event occurred where in more than 17 million people were intentionally murdered? Who was the murderer? Who was murdered? If you cant come with proof, don’t come at all. If you have no receipts it proves that your statements are flippant not facts.
