Nov 3

History: Search for Lost Giants

History writes “The Vieira brothers travel to the Ozarks and make two possibly game-changing discoveries. See more in Season 1, Episode 2, A Photo, A Tooth, The Truth?”

3 Responses to “History: Search for Lost Giants”

  1. Evelyn L

    Funny how today’s archeologists refuse to accept that there were once ancient civilizations in North, Central, and South America. When European settlers first came here the natives told them that various places such as the mounds and certain rock structures were here before their ancestors arrived. There used to be miles of rock walls that covered much of the North East. Stories are told of how the first settlers made those rock walls, which is ridiculous. They did not have the time or ability to build miles of four foot rock walls or the huge rock structures at America’s Stonehenge.
    It was accepted fact that there had been giants that walked the land long ago. President Lincoln spoke of the giants that had walked the land before us during a speech at Niagara Falls. It was only after certain secret societies began infiltrating the most prestigious higher learning institutions of the west with the ideologies of modernism and Darwinism during the mid 19th century that there was a move to deny those truths about the giants and the civilization. It does not fit with their story that, today, nobody is allowed to challenge.
    The Smithsonian Institute was founded soon after the Civil War. A few decades after that troops were sent out from Washington DC that collected up all of the giant bones throughout the North East and other artifacts that had been found by early settlers as they cleared the land. Some of the receipts still exist that were given out to private collectors and to museums that owned those artifacts. For some strange reason the Smithsonian has managed to lose all of of the evidence. Time did not “swallow up” the evidence of those giants. The Smithsonian did just as they still do today. They either hide the evidence or destroy it. History has been buried by these people.
    I grew up in an area of the North East where giant skeletons were dug up as settlers moved in. Newspapers articles about these finds still exist, however, scientists now tell us that the doctors back then did not know how to properly measure the bones of skeletons. ???? A long bone is a long bone no matter who measures it. Yes, how the joints were connected is important but it does not change the distance from the hip to the knee the knee to the ankle. Nor does it change the size of the skull. The Smithsonian does not want these facts known at any price.
    Apparently anything that confirms the Bible or other ancient writings has to be dismissed by the academics. The oral history of the natives has been rejected. We are told that to say that an ancient civilization existed is “racist” and demeaning to the Native Americans even though they denied being connected to the mounds, the rock formations, and the artifacts. Anything that may not fit in with academia’s evolutionary theory has to be denied. The land bridge theory cannot be threatened either.
    The natives of the Americas believed that everything in nature has a spirit. The animals, the trees, even the lakes, ponds, and streams. They believed that they could be cursed by those spirits if they misused them. That is why they never changed any topography of the land or bodies of water and never built permanent structures. They certainly did not move huge rocks weighing many tons or build giant mounds but, of course, academia knows better.
    Our own local library has missing pieces. No one can account for them and eventually people just forget and move on. This is how these people have been able to get away with destroying so much history. There has been a definite coverup of history. Lies have been told
    The academics of today claim that natives carrying baskets of dirt for hundreds of years made the giant mounds. The natives state that they were there when their ancestors arrived in the area but academia know better even though those mounds were expertly engineered. If they were simply piles of dirt that men had piled up they would have disappeared long ago. Rain would have totally eroded them. Besides primitive man did not have the laborers to spare to build mounds. They needed every hand working just to exist in that harsh world.
    Just as the Sasquatch does not fit in with the evolutionary timeline neither do other giants. Academia is never going to budge from their position.
    Usually these history channel programs get people interested in giants or monsters or whatever but they almost always leave people disappointed. There is always a denial at the end. It seems like History Channel people want the views but are working for the academics that do not want the truth revealed.
    Those who are investigating should not take their evidence to the very people who do not want the truth revealed. They will smile and take it then make up the lie that fits best. The west now has a new kind of fascist type of educational system. I

    • Jason J

      Exactly. It’s to perpetuate lies so they remain “experts” in certain fields. For instance, dismissing the skull as having the lower jaw of an orangutan? Seriously? What are the chances of finding a primate jaw that perfectly matches that of any human? Even then, that doesn’t explain the cranium or the rest of the bones sizes, femurs, tibia, pelvis. Notice how the subject is changed? They have no answer.

  2. theresa m

    I have lived in New England all of my life. There are lots of stone walls that you can see in the woods no matter where you travel. I’ve been told the walls mark property lines and they are not four feet tall, more like two feet tall. Is it because people have taken rocks away from them over the years? Not sure, but I believe there are giants and they have been covered up.

Leave a Reply