ThinkerThunker writes “This final episode (of a 4 part series) was a half-a-century in the making. It pits a new scientific tool “PDNA” against the “Scientific” community, and exposes the truth concerning the connection between the “Dyatlov Pass” & “Patterson Bigfoot” mysteries.”
Richard W
Very interesting comparisons. Thanks Thinker Thunker!
Charles R
First I believe this to be a human, It may be one of the expedition members, or someone else. I see loose fitting maybe layed clothing with the top outer garmet lighter than the pants and, of course, the head is obscured. The legs are at least a foot buried into snow. This tragedy will probably never be solved.
My guess is there was one or more student in this group that was,were, dissidents. In their journal I believe there was an entry about really bright lights. The Russian regime under Kruschev was the most brutal in the world and their KGB had full reign to do as they please with suspected dissidents or presumed traitors of the state. A military helicopter was flown into this remote region where no one else would be and killed all the team using rifle stocks or something else with blunt force trauma and just left as is. Predator animals like wolves could have cause damage until the bodies froze solid which would have happened soon. Second is they ran into some secret military ops by chance and they did the same as they had no regard for human life.
Knobby
I used to really like Thinker Thunker, but in his bid to prove “it could only be a sasquatch” he will leave details to the contrary out and I think he fudges things at times to support his (it could only be a sasquatch). The pants could be baggy and extend down below the crotch. He’ll skip over things like the obvious lighter colored jacket and darker pants, and it likely has a ski mask covering the face. It’s not a broad shouldered/barrel chested sasquatch like Patty, doesn’t have the neck muscles that fan out giving a no neck appearance. He leaves things like this out in his Patty comparison because he commonly will not address things to the contrary (unless he can refute it).
What likely occurred is they heard an avalanche at night. That would explain them exiting the tents without getting dressed, even running single file in bare feet. The avalanche seems to hit one group that ran the wrong way, the other group that made it to trees (some climbing trees in an apparent bid to avoid an avalanche). The avalanche missed the tents, but in the darkness they could just hear the rumble of the avalanche. The one group was deep under snow and had injuries (apparently from the avalanche); the group that made it to the tree line were not buried under snow.
Charles R
Hi Knobby. I see the same characteristics that you do in the photo, good call. I bet you are correct about the subject having a head covering that totally obscured the head and neck. Now an avalanche would certainly explain the mad rush to leave, and/or the avalanche, especially a slab avalanche carring the occupants and having enough force to cause the cracked ribs and skull fractures that several members experienced. And these slab avalanches can happen on only a 28 degree slope with the right conditions. My theory is based on the bright light they saw.
In any case I agree about TT. I got over him a decade ago, first when he put out a video saying the subject were carrying something, when it fact it was hunters carring turkey decoys. Then a little while later he put out the ridiculous Yellowstone video of cross country skiers going along the road and the Yellowtone Lodge, claiming they were Bigfoots that were trying to sneak up on buffalo that were in the foreground. He just recently put out another video on this Yellowstone incident still sticking to his ridiculous assertation.
Knobby
I notice the cover page of the video shows a completely dark image of the subject in question, unlike the normal image of the likely lighter jacket and dark pants. Why is that? In the video he does show the correct image right at the 9:19 minute mark. And then by the 9:20 minute mark he’s darkened the image, obscuring the marked difference between the two distinctly different articles of clothing.
Knobby
I agree Charles, he’s been wrong on so many of his “it could only be a sasquatch.” The Yellow Stone one was a good example. When zooming in compression makes the objects in the background appear larger than they are in comparison to objects in the foreground. Phil Poling did an analysis of TT’s video and said when he cut and pasted the cross country skier and put it next to the buffalo for comparison, TT enlarged the figure. Poling demonstrated his cutting and pasting from the video to show TT’s figure was larger. I don’t trust TT.
Charles R
Agreed Knobby, it was Phil Poling and also Michael Merchant who showed the scientific nature of wide angle cameras and the compression that blew TTs handy work out the door. For me even before this was that the figures were bacically in front of the Yellowstone lodge in broad daylight all in one line following each other in the same cross country ski tracks, before Phil and Michael even posted. Yellowstone in the winter at this time still averages 900 visitors each day. So the very nature that in front of the Yellowstone Lodge a group of 3 or 4 Bigfoots were trying to sneak up on a group of Bison was beyond absurd.