Salish Sasquatch writes “Channel favorite, Jack Bowers, invites us to a Townhall meeting in Ryderwood, Washington, to hear from the son of Ray Wallace.
Ray was the prankster from the 60’s that made bigfoot footprints around construction equipment. Michael Wallace tells us his father‘s history and also shares his new book, Son of Bigfoot.”
Steven B
With all due respect to Mr. Wallace’s son, if “Patty” was a man in a suit, how are the depth of the footprints she left explained and how is it explained that such a costume, according to make-up expert Bill Munns, was not available at the time nor even the materials to build it.? Also, Mr. Munns has stated that you could not build such a costume to fit a human being’s proportions neither in the body nor the head. There MAY have been someone around with a suit but Mr. Munns firmly states that the PG film does not show that. Furthermore, Mr. Wallace’s fake prints were not the ONLY prints found and other print casts had been examined and determined by Dr. Jeff Meldrum as being from a living foot – not an inflexible model.
Charles R
Spot on Steven B.
Simon B
I have been following Marq Evan’s podcast on YouTube ‘Capturing Bigfoot’ in the run up to the release of his documentary, quite interesting for anyone who has studied the PG film. On Episode 2 He interviewed Daniel Perez and DP talked about this time frame within Bluff Creek, when the logging roads were being constructed and the investigations carried out by John Green & Rene Dahinden on the tracks found. There were 3 different sizes and the prints stretched for over 3 miles. There are a lot of unanswered questions even in situations where hoaxing is alleged to have been at play. In some ways the hoaxing is an enigma all of its own despite the Bigfoot phenomenon.