Home Forums Sasquatch Forum O/T: Climate Change hoax?

This topic contains 195 replies, has 19 voices, and was last updated by  Gumshoguy 3 hours, 26 minutes ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 196 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #159960

    Debbie Chamberlin
    Participant

    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!
    Climate change is no hoax!

    #159963

    Amy H
    Participant

    Lol!!

    #159968

    Knobby
    Moderator

    Okay, on a cautionary note we should keep abreast of the latest Climate Change news. This was just posted today at Yahoo News.

    “Madrid (AFP) – Confronted with a climate crisis threatening civilisation itself, humanity must choose between hope and surrender, UN chief Antonio Guterres told the opening plenary of the UN COP25 climate conference Tuesday.

    “One is the path of surrender, where we have sleepwalked past the point of no return, jeopardising the health and safety of everyone on this planet,” Guterres said.

    “Do we really want to be remembered as the generation that buried its head in the sand, that fiddled while the planet burned?”

    https://news.yahoo.com/choose-hope-climate-surrender-says-un-chief-112544904.html

    That’s the latest news on Climate Change, although it sounds a lot like the same news from last year, and the year before that, and so on, and also the same news next year.

    #159979

    chris422
    Participant

    It’s sad to think that people buy into man-made climate change. The only one controlling the climate is mother-nature. It’s pure vanity to think otherwise.

    #159984

    Michael H
    Participant

    It’s not a hoax for ___ sake. Go tell the Scandinavian people in Norway or Sweden that’s it’s a hoax.. it’s effecting them now. Water has risen to a point up north where some bridges are no longer used as water has risen to unsafe levels.. here in Australia we are having unseen extreme heat waves and drought worse than ever here in Queensland. I don’t know if you guys are sheltered, uneducated or just used to drinking koolaid from Fox News their in America but it’s light and day real

    .
    .
    .
    MOD NOTE
    See the pinned rules. You can’t use that language here. Moreover, climate alarmists blame everything from floods to droughts on man made global warming without a clear connection.

    #159985

    Michael H
    Participant

    Were you educated? Is science not your strong suit?

    Alarmists Propose Rebranding ‘Climate Change’ for Greater Shock Value

    Source: Briebart News

    https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/11/29/alarmists-propose-rebranding-climate-change-for-greater-shock-value/

    ———————————————-

    Plot idea: Contrive a scheme to separate people from their wealth by scarring them to death.
    .
    .
    .
    MODNOTE: Your post is right on script. Hi Michael, save the profanities for the bar or your dinner table don’t bring it here to this forum. 97% of the world’s scientists contrive an environmental crisis, but are exposed by a plucky band of billionaires & oil companies. Maybe we should all learn some science and stop pushing the global warming scam and distribution! Rather than fretting over ”Global climate change,” in Australia, I would be concerned about interfering with sovereign elections of countries outside of Australia and or people chasing people down in the streets with a five foot tusk to poke and stab them because their government disarmed their own citizens than “climate change.” Besides Queensland, Who watches FOX Fake News anymore? ~ Gumshoguy

    ———————

    #159992

    Amy H
    Participant

    Yup, I’m educated. I have a degree in business and a minor in botany. I also live with a highly educated ecologist/biologist.

    Perhaps the heading of this thread is irksome? Climate change isn’t a “hoax” per se, it’s the man-made insinuation that’s the problem. Reading the thread would seem to have made that clear?

    Why is it so difficult to accept that climate change is a natural occurring process? Why can’t the left be honest about it? Can our decreases in green house emissions slow down this change in climate? That’s a question! Not an answer. This issue has become political. There’s an incredible level of dishonesty and hypocrisy in the scientific community as well. Now, we’ll never hear the truth. It’s up to each of us to research the LITERATURE, of which few know even where to find, and come to our own conclusions.

    I for one, have done that. There’s no denying it’s real, but the solutions proposed are politically generated. That’s the problem.

    Remember, Alaska used to be a warm jungle. The Kalahari desert wasn’t desert. Antarctica used to be warm with large animals. The Sahara desert used to be a forest. Most of Africa used to be a desert without jungles. We used to have 19 million years of drought. During the Medieval time there was a warm period… 950-1250. There was the little ice age between 1300 & 1870. There was a Roman warm period running from 250bc to 400AD. All those are short term things that have been occurring, and there are more of them, since the earth came out of its last glaciation period. There’s been a great deal of discussion as to whether the earth, which is currently in an interglacial period, was still coming out of the glacial period or going back into another one. That’s how these thing VARY.

    The climates changes frequently over geological time. Climate changes in a whole bunch of periodicities. Some changes are due to, as an example, eruptions like the Krakatoa eruption in the early 1800’s which caused 3 years of winter. It cooled the climate rather dramatically for a few years. If you get what I’m saying then you’ll understand why Climate Modeling is so DIFFICULT.

    The political left is controlling the narrative at present. But they really don’t know what the narrative is but they know what they want it to be.

    Want a little education? Read “effective conservation science, data not dogma”. Edited by Peter Kareiva, Michelle Marvier, and Brian Sullivan. It’s 185 pages of short articles on critical topics in conservation science ie climate changes. It’s a start.

    #159993

    Knobby
    Moderator

    Rebranding is a common tactic. That’s how pro-abortion became pro-choice, to instill its about a woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body, when in fact its really about killing the body inside of her (its about more than her body, not like removing a tumor).

    Why the switch from global warming to climate change? Not sure, but speculation is due to during the 00’s the temperature quit rising during that decade, and some years even dropped, obliterating even conservative warming models, and they started calling it climate change.

    What’s this deal with putting children on the stage to propel this agenda? Its their future you’re ruining, as Greta says, we’re taking away her dreams. Her grimace deserves the climate change Global Meltdown Oscar.

    #159994

    Gumshoguy
    Moderator

    The great con. You, the taxpayer, are the mark. How many trillions have been spent on Global Warming? To do what exactly? Where (who) does the money go to?

    ——————————————————–

    #159995

    Gumshoguy
    Moderator

    Not sure if that thret is the Australian national anthem they are singing there? Is that Global Climate Change they are chanting? Just wondering.

    ——————————————–

    #159998

    Knobby
    Moderator

    Gumshoguy wrote, “The great con. You, the taxpayer, are the mark. How many trillions have been spent on Global Warming?”

    I think it may have been you (or someone) who quoted how world hunger would be solved by a fraction of the money spent on global warming.

    Joseph Gobles, Hitler’s propaganda minister, had one simple strategy. Control the airwaves/print media and say the same thing over and over whether its factual or not and people will begin to believe it. That strategy worked to sway the population against the Jews.

    #159999

    chris422
    Participant

    Globalist pawns are easy to spot these days; They always froth at the mouth and speak gibberish when the word climate is spoken. It isn’t the climate that’s the threat; It’s globalism.

    #160003

    Amy H
    Participant

    It’s such a common tactic as to almost be laughable.

    “Control the airwaves/print media and say the same thing over and over whether its factual or not and people will begin to believe it.”

    Another misnomer about climate change is that it will affect everything negatively. Simply untrue.

    The blanket statements about the negative consequences on all of humanity shouldn’t be difficult to fact check yet those nutters say it regularly and people believe it.

    There’s always someone trying to run a con. The best ones are the mass delusional. Believing genocides are the only way to solve differences is an example. I can think of a few going on. The Israel/Arab conflict. The Arab countries think the solution is death to all Jews. Inculcate people young into believing a group of people are scourges, less worthy, anointed by god, not human keeps that delusion rolling, all over the world. India believing youre born into a class and thus can never leave. Believing rhino horns, tiger bones, conk silica rods improve virility is a mass delusion brought about by Eastern medicine and jungle doctors. Thinking one can actually change the size of their male sexual organ by doing one of the 100’s of procedures sold all over the world. A con from all over the world.

    Those are cons. Training people into believing unbelievable poop. Telling people what they want to hear. In climate change it’s we humans have a tremendous impact so much so that we can ruin the earth. Ridiculous.

    Cons are all the same; it’s about power and money.

    #160011

    Steven B
    Participant

    I’m re-posting a video Knobby posted due to the fact that one of the scientists in it speaks of “rising water levels.”

    People that believe the climate “alarmists” NEED to hear what other scientists are saying. IT is NOT settled.

    Jon Stossel is an investigative journalist and not a scientist, however, he did attempt to bring scientists together for a debate on Man-made climate change. Guess who showed? Only the scientists prepared to debate that there IS NOT man-made climate change. Listen to what they have to say. The video is short:

    John Stossel
    561,967 views •Nov 19, 2019
    Climate alarmists spread myths and declare impending doom.

    #160014

    chris422
    Participant

    bb

    Come on Michael H; We’ll sing “kumbaya” for the earth!

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 196 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.